<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; John Coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/john-coffee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Coughlin Stoia, AmLaw Daily and Prof. John Coffee, cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coughlin Stoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Coffee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, updating a Tuesday post, I expressed some annoyance that AmLaw Daily&#8217;s coverage of the $688 million Enron fee award extensively quoted Columbia lawprof Jack Coffee in support of the fee&#8217;s fairness &#8212; even casting him as a &#8220;frequent class action critic&#8221; whose praise for the fee was more credible because &#8220;unlikely&#8221; &#8212; without informing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, updating a Tuesday post, I <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/">expressed some annoyance</a> that AmLaw Daily&#8217;s coverage of the $688 million Enron fee award extensively quoted Columbia lawprof Jack Coffee in support of the fee&#8217;s fairness &#8212; even casting him as a &#8220;frequent class action critic&#8221; whose praise for the fee was more credible because &#8220;unlikely&#8221; &#8212; without informing readers that Prof. Coffee had in fact been hired by the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers to support their fee application, a role he has served in earlier cases as well. Now the publication has <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/09/coughlin-stoia.html">&#8220;updated [the post] with new information&#8221;</a> reflecting that relationship. Journalism professor Mark Obbie of Syracuse&#8217;s Carnegie Legal Reporting Program is kind enough to <a href="http://newhouse-web.syr.edu/legal/blog_comments.cfm?blogpost=738">credit my criticism with making a difference</a>. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/coughlin-stoia/" title="Coughlin Stoia" rel="tag">Coughlin Stoia</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/expert-witnesses/" title="expert witnesses" rel="tag">expert witnesses</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/john-coffee/" title="John Coffee" rel="tag">John Coffee</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/" title="Enron: class action lawyers set to get $688 million (September 9, 2008)">Enron: class action lawyers set to get $688 million</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/yogurt-marketing-class-action/" title="Yogurt marketing class action (January 24, 2008)">Yogurt marketing class action</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/who-was-that-court-appointed-expert-again/" title="Who was that court-appointed expert again? (November 9, 2011)">Who was that court-appointed expert again?</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/03/welcome-forbes-readers/" title="Welcome Forbes readers (March 25, 2005)">Welcome Forbes readers</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/weakness-of-our-partisan-expert-witness-system/" title="Weakness of our partisan expert witness system (March 31, 2009)">Weakness of our partisan expert witness system</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enron: class action lawyers set to get $688 million</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Lerach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coughlin Stoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeing frenzy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Coffee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman &#038; Robbins, formerly of Bill Lerach fame, and other law firms sued to pin the blame on banks, auditors, and other outside deep-pocket third parties, as well as on directors; defendants collectively paid $7.2 billion. Giving the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers $688 million of that is very &#8220;fair and reasonable&#8221; and involves no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman &#038; Robbins, formerly of Bill Lerach fame, and other law firms sued to pin the blame on banks, auditors, and other outside deep-pocket third parties, as well as on directors; defendants collectively paid $7.2 billion. Giving the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers $688 million of that is very &#8220;fair and reasonable&#8221; and involves no &#8220;windfall&#8221;, per U.S. District Judge Melinda Harmon. (Bloomberg, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aakdO2wIq9xU&#038;refer=worldwide">Sept. 8</a>). </p>
<p><strong>More</strong>: OK, so maybe Brian Baxter of AmLaw Daily is just pursuing a reasonable news angle when he <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/09/coughlin-stoia.html">quotes the Coughlin Stoia lawyers doing a little victory lap and waving to the crowd</a>. But if he&#8217;s going to quote Prof. John Coffee at such length as his big authority in support of the fee&#8217;s fairness, shouldn&#8217;t he go beyond identifying Coffee as &#8220;a professor at Columbia Law School and frequent class action critic&#8221; to spell out a little more explicitly that, you know, Coffee was <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/enron-lawyers-want-695-million-texas-objects/">hired by the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers in this case to defend their fee request</a>? Doesn&#8217;t that make it less surprising that Patrick Coughlin &#8220;welcomes the positive feedback&#8221; from these supposedly &#8220;unlikely legal circles&#8221; to support his case? (<a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/1-billion-legal-fee-eyed-in-enron-suit/">more background</a>, <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/11/21/lerach-may-see-50-million-in-enron-fees/">yet more</a>). </p>
<p><strong>Update</strong> <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/">Thurs. a.m.</a>: by yesterday evening American Lawyer had substantially &#8220;updated [the post] with new information&#8221; to reflect the Coffee relationship, and Prof. Obbie is kind enough to <a href="http://newhouse-web.syr.edu/legal/blog_comments.cfm?blogpost=738">give me some credit</a> for that happening. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/bill-lerach/" title="Bill Lerach" rel="tag">Bill Lerach</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/coughlin-stoia/" title="Coughlin Stoia" rel="tag">Coughlin Stoia</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/enron/" title="Enron" rel="tag">Enron</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/feeing-frenzy/" title="feeing frenzy" rel="tag">feeing frenzy</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/john-coffee/" title="John Coffee" rel="tag">John Coffee</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/09/163-million-in-lawyer-fees-ok/" title="&#8220;$16.3 million in lawyer fees OK&#8221; (September 12, 2005)">&#8220;$16.3 million in lawyer fees OK&#8221;</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/yogurt-marketing-class-action/" title="Yogurt marketing class action (January 24, 2008)">Yogurt marketing class action</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/tonights-2020-stossel-on-extortionate-attorneys/" title="Tonight&#8217;s 20/20: Stossel on extortionate attorneys (April 4, 2008)">Tonight&#8217;s 20/20: Stossel on extortionate attorneys</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/the-milberg-weiss-four-after-prison/" title="The Milberg Weiss Four after prison (March 19, 2010)">The Milberg Weiss Four after prison</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/special-master-coughlin-stoia-paid-for-stolen-coke-documents/" title="Special master: Coughlin Stoia paid for &#8220;stolen&#8221; Coke documents (March 4, 2008)">Special master: Coughlin Stoia paid for &#8220;stolen&#8221; Coke documents</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

