<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; junk science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:58:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>About that &#8220;GMO food causes rat tumors&#8221; report</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t miss multiple posts by BoingBoing&#8217;s Maggie Koerth-Baker on the shoddy science behind a recent alarmist report. It&#8217;s all the more noteworthy because one of her BB colleagues was at first taken in by the report, requiring an awkward rowback that developed into a crusade of its own against bad activist science. Earlier on Prop [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/">About that &#8220;GMO food causes rat tumors&#8221; report</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t miss <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/21/authors-of-study-linking-gm-co.html">multiple</a> <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/21/of-gm-corn-and-rat-tumors-why.html">posts</a> by BoingBoing&#8217;s Maggie Koerth-Baker on the shoddy science behind a recent alarmist report. It&#8217;s all the more noteworthy because one of her BB colleagues was <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/the-dumb-no-on-37-campaign.html">at first taken in</a> by the report, requiring an awkward rowback that developed into a crusade of its own against bad activist science. Earlier on Prop 37 and the California political angle <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/prop-37-gmos/">here</a>, etc.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="About that &#8220;GMO food causes rat tumors&#8221; report" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/">About that &#8220;GMO food causes rat tumors&#8221; report</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About that &#8220;gay parenting&#8221; study</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=about-gay-parenting-study</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrong right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=31453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost entirely off-topic for this site, but some readers may be interested in my new piece for Huffington Post (my first in that venue) poking some additional holes in an already much-criticized study by Mark Regnerus finding bad life outcomes among young adults who report that a parent had a same-sex relationship. Sample: The [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/">About that &#8220;gay parenting&#8221; study</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost entirely off-topic for this site, but some readers may be interested in my <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/walter-olson/regnerus-gay-parenting-study_b_1681253.html">new piece for Huffington Post</a> (my first in that venue) poking some additional holes in an already much-criticized study by Mark Regnerus finding bad life outcomes among young adults who report that a parent had a same-sex relationship. Sample: </p>
<blockquote><p>The Witherspoon Institute, discussing the study&#8217;s findings, adds another clue: &#8220;48% of the respondents with a GF [gay father], and 43% of the respondents with an LM [lesbian mother] indicated that they were either black or Hispanic.&#8221; Those numbers sound awfully high, and they are. They far exceed the roughly 30-percent black-plus-Hispanic share of the U.S. population. Why would young adults with minority backgrounds and a high rate of economic distress report having far more than their share of gay parents? Are they somehow more likely to grow up in homes with actual gay parents? Or are their parents somehow being overclassified as gay?</p></blockquote>
<p>Putting together that with other anomalies in the study data, I conclude that the study does not come even close to measuring what it claims to be measuring. See also: <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2012/06/a-faulty-gay-parenting-study.html">Amy Davidson, New Yorker</a>, among a whole mini-literature of responses.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="About that &#8220;gay parenting&#8221; study" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/same-sex-marriage/" title="same-sex marriage" rel="tag">same-sex marriage</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/wrong-right/" title="wrong right" rel="tag">wrong right</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/">About that &#8220;gay parenting&#8221; study</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/07/about-gay-parenting-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 1 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=september-1-roundup-2</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 05:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Massage Parlor Mistrial Declared After Masseuse Recognizes Defense Lawyer as Client&#8221; [ABA Journal] Paying opposing expert to leave country? &#8220;Drug company lawyer taped trying to foil lawsuit&#8221; [AP] What anti-business crusades have in common with the War on Drugs [David Henderson] Some of those &#8220;oil and gas subsidies&#8221; aren&#8217;t [Coyote] Nocera on NLRB v. Boeing [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/">September 1 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>&#8220;Massage Parlor Mistrial Declared After Masseuse Recognizes Defense Lawyer as Client&#8221; [<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/massage_parlor_mistrial_declared_after_masseuse_recognizes_defense_lawyer_a">ABA Journal</a>] </li>
<li>Paying opposing expert to leave country? &#8220;Drug company lawyer taped trying to foil lawsuit&#8221; [<a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/drug-company-lawyer-taped-trying-to-foil-lawsuit-1.3103544">AP</a>]  </li>
<li>What anti-business crusades have in common with the War on Drugs [<a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2011/08/are_taxes_on_co.html">David Henderson</a>]  Some of those &#8220;oil and gas subsidies&#8221; aren&#8217;t [<a href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2011/08/wtf-this-is-what-they-mean-by-oil-and-gas-subsidies.html">Coyote</a>]  </li>
<li>Nocera on NLRB v. Boeing [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/opinion/nocera-how-democrats-hurt-job-creation.html?_r=2&#038;hp">NYT</a>] A contrary view [<a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2011/08/response-to-nocera-on-boeing-complaint.html">Hirsch</a>] </li>
<li>Science finds no link between WTC dust, cancer? Then science will just have to give [<a href="http://reason.com/archives/2011/08/09/the-great-911-dust-debate">Jeff Stier, Reason</a>; <strong>but see</strong> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904583204576544713561820254.html">later study</a> on firefighters at the scene]  </li>
<li>Per Maureen Orth at Vanity Fair, the widow of designer Oleg Cassini has been in at least 15 lawsuits. Guess who&#8217;s named in number 16? [<a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2011/08/10-million-vanity-fair-lawsuit-sarah-palin-grandmother-again/41006/">AW</a>]  </li>
<li>Stop competing with us! Lawyers claim online-legal-form provider LegalZoom is engaged in unauthorized practice of law  [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/07/27/class-action-claims-online-legal-forms-pose-threat-to-consumers/">WSJ</a>, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2011/07/25/non-lawyers-find-it-hard-avoid-breaking-bars-vague-rules/">Dan Fisher</a>, <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/alabama_lawyer_group_files_suit_to_ban_legalzoom/">ABA Journal</a>] </li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="September 1 roundup" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/labor-unions/" title="labor unions" rel="tag">labor unions</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/oil-industry/" title="oil industry" rel="tag">oil industry</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/">September 1 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/september-1-roundup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wakefield%25e2%2580%2599s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A British Medical Journal editorial confirms that scientific misconduct by then-Dr. Andrew Wakefield was even worse than previously assumed. The resulting media-fueled panic led parents to refuse vaccination in large numbers, and childhood scourges such as measles soared as a result, with disability and even death resulting. Wakefield was being financed by lawyers hoping to [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/">&#8220;Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452">British Medical Journal editorial</a> confirms that scientific misconduct by then-Dr. Andrew Wakefield was even worse than previously assumed. The resulting media-fueled panic led parents to refuse vaccination in large numbers, and childhood scourges such as measles soared as a result, with disability and even death resulting.  Wakefield was being financed by lawyers hoping to sue the vaccine industry. [<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2011/01/piltdown_medicine_andrew_wakefields_scie.php">Respectful Insolence</a>, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/index.html?hpt=T1&#038;iref=BN1">CNN</a>, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/01/05/journal-study-linking-vaccine-autism-fraud/">AP</a>, <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/01/06/vaccine-autism-study-an-elaborate-fraud/">Adler</a>] </p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="&#8220;Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent&#8221;" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/autism/" title="autism" rel="tag">autism</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/vaccines/" title="vaccines" rel="tag">vaccines</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/">&#8220;Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/wakefield%e2%80%99s-article-linking-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-was-fraudulent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claim: touching smokers&#8217; clothing can cause &#8220;massive&#8221; nerve damage</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Accurate science, or Science For Your Own Good? [Michael Siegel] Tweet Tags: junk science, tobacco</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/">Claim: touching smokers&#8217; clothing can cause &#8220;massive&#8221; nerve damage</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accurate science, or Science For Your Own Good? [<a href="http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/10/stop-and-think-about-this-anti-smoking.html">Michael Siegel</a>]</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Claim: touching smokers&#8217; clothing can cause &#8220;massive&#8221; nerve damage" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/tobacco/" title="tobacco" rel="tag">tobacco</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/">Claim: touching smokers&#8217; clothing can cause &#8220;massive&#8221; nerve damage</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/claim-touching-smokers-clothing-can-cause-massive-nerve-damage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad-mouthing Toyota and its defenders</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudden acceleration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago I promised myself that I&#8217;d stop wading into comments sections, but my breach of that promise today in a trial-lawyer blog attacking me for pointing out the truth about the bogus Toyota sudden acceleration claims might amuse some readers, and I might as well get a post out of it. &#8220;Are not companies [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/">Bad-mouthing Toyota and its defenders</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago I promised myself that I&#8217;d stop wading into comments sections, but <a href="http://kansascity.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/dear-ted-frank.aspx?googleid=283082&amp;utm_source=commentemails&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=comment%2Bnotifications#comments">my breach of that promise today</a> in a trial-lawyer blog attacking me for pointing out <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/toyota/">the truth about the bogus Toyota sudden acceleration claims</a> might amuse some readers, and I might as well get a post out of it.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Are not companies obligated to make the safest vehicle possible?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The  safest vehicle possible is a Sherman tank with a restrictor plate  preventing it from exceeding 1 mph, so the answer to your question is  &#8220;no&#8221;—though certainly trial lawyers have an interest in asking you to  think manufacturers are doing something wrong when they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Until Toyota can identify the exact cause of these accidents (besides  the too-convenient driver error) anything and everything is in question  and must be investigated.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I look forward to you writing NHTSA  and demanding they investigate if invisible vampires are causing elderly  drivers to hit the wrong pedal.  After all, anything and everything is  in question, and you reject Occam&#8217;s Razor when it comes to an alleged  electronic defect that simultaneously causes three separate systems to  malfunction six times more often for elderly drivers than non-elderly  drivers, so why not demand an investigation of the equally unlikely  invisible-vampire problem as long as you&#8217;re rejecting science?</p></blockquote>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Bad-mouthing Toyota and its defenders" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/product-liability/" title="product liability" rel="tag">product liability</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/sudden-acceleration/" title="sudden acceleration" rel="tag">sudden acceleration</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/toyota/" title="Toyota" rel="tag">Toyota</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/">Bad-mouthing Toyota and its defenders</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bad-mouthing-toyota-and-its-defenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: South Carolina $18M sudden acceleration verdict reversed</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudden acceleration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=16499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And in timely news, a specious $18M sudden acceleration verdict (see our August 2006 coverage) was unanimously reversed by the South Carolina Supreme Court after they threw out junk-science testimony theorizing that electromagnetic interference with the cruise control caused the sudden acceleration. Passengers in the crash that wore their seatbelts were uninjured, but the unbelted [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/">Update: South Carolina $18M sudden acceleration verdict reversed</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in timely news, a specious $18M sudden acceleration verdict (see our <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/08/18-million-sudden-acceleration-verdict-in-south-carolina/">August 2006 coverage</a>) was unanimously reversed by the South Carolina Supreme Court after they threw out junk-science testimony theorizing that electromagnetic interference with the cruise control caused the sudden acceleration.  Passengers in the crash that wore their seatbelts were uninjured, but the unbelted driver was paralyzed.  The plaintiff has the option of a new trial.  (<I><A href="http://www.sccourts.org/opinions/displayOpinion.cfm?caseNo=26786">Sonya Watson v. Ford Motor Company</a></i>, h/t <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/exorcising-toyota%E2%80%99s-demons/comment-page-1/#comment-85560">L Nettles comment</a>).</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Update: South Carolina $18M sudden acceleration verdict reversed" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/autos/" title="autos" rel="tag">autos</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ford-explorer/" title="Ford Explorer" rel="tag">Ford Explorer</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ford-motor/" title="Ford Motor" rel="tag">Ford Motor</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/south-carolina/" title="South Carolina" rel="tag">South Carolina</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/sudden-acceleration/" title="sudden acceleration" rel="tag">sudden acceleration</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/">Update: South Carolina $18M sudden acceleration verdict reversed</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/03/update-south-carolina-18m-sudden-acceleration-verdict-reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancet repudiates MMR vaccine study</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It only took twelve years, but Lancet, which oft publishes politically motivated papers masquerading as medicine, has conceded that the 1998 paper criticizing MMR vaccines was simply &#8220;false.&#8221; [Lancet; BBC] No telling how many children died in the meantime, all so trial lawyers could line their pockets attacking vaccine manufacturers. Tweet Tags: junk science, vaccines</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/">Lancet repudiates MMR vaccine study</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It only took twelve years, but Lancet, which oft publishes politically motivated papers masquerading as medicine, has conceded that the 1998 paper criticizing MMR vaccines was simply &#8220;false.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext">Lancet</a>; <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8493753.stm">BBC</a>] </p>
<p>No telling how many children died in the meantime, all so trial lawyers could line their pockets attacking vaccine manufacturers.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Lancet repudiates MMR vaccine study" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/vaccines/" title="vaccines" rel="tag">vaccines</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/">Lancet repudiates MMR vaccine study</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/lancet-repudiates-mmr-vaccine-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December 23 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=december-23-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour suits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AT&#038;T sued for $1 billion for allegedly misclassifying managers [Hyman, American Lawyer] Shaken-baby-syndrome angle deserved more attention in Baucus-girlfriend-for-U.S.-Attorney flap [Kos, Freeland, earlier] Awful: &#8220;Holocaust Denier Sues Survivor&#8221; [South Florida Sun-Sentinel via Faces of Lawsuit Abuse "worst lawsuits of 2009" poll which you can take here] Bizarre new twist in rogue Philly cop unit story [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/">December 23 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>AT&#038;T sued for $1 billion for allegedly misclassifying managers [<a href="http://ohioemploymentlaw.blogspot.com/2009/12/at-sued-for-billion-dollars-in-wage-and.html">Hyman</a>, <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202436692233&#038;rss=newswire">American Lawyer</a>] </li>
<li>Shaken-baby-syndrome angle deserved more attention in Baucus-girlfriend-for-U.S.-Attorney flap [<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/12/5/811048/-Max-Baucus-Mistress-Interesting-Past">Kos</a>, <a href="http://nmisscommentor.com/2009/12/06/max-baucus-puts-up-his-girlfriend-for-us-attorney/">Freeland</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/september-23-roundup-2/">earlier</a>] </li>
<li>Awful: &#8220;Holocaust Denier Sues Survivor&#8221; [<a href="http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-10-20/news/0910190465_1_elie-wiesel-eric-hunt-holocaust">South Florida Sun-Sentinel</a> via <a href="http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/">Faces of Lawsuit Abuse</a> "worst lawsuits of 2009" poll which you can <a href="http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/poll/">take here</a>] </li>
<li>Bizarre new twist in rogue Philly cop unit story [<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2009/12/17/strange-new-twist-in-scandal-i">Balko</a>, earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/the-thugs-wore-badges-contd/">here</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/05/may-6-roundup-2/">here</a>, etc.] </li>
<li>More on the first &#8220;Bruno&#8221; lawsuit against Sacha Baron Cohen [<a href="http://www.loweringthebar.net/2009/12/first-bruno-lawsuit-filed.html">Lowering the Bar</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-11-roundup-2/">earlier</a>] </li>
<li>False accusation as academic career booster: &#8220;The Rot at Duke&#8221;  [<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/print_friendly.php?ID=or_20091219_1261">Stuart Taylor, Jr.</a>, National Journal] </li>
<li>Claim: Netflix recommendation algorithm contest exposed a subscriber&#8217;s privacy to her detriment [<a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/netflix-privacy-lawsuit/">Singel, Wired</a>] </li>
<li>No “Continuing Duty to Investigate Accuracy” of Newspaper Article Posted on Web Site [<a href="http://volokh.com/2009/12/15/no-continuing-duty-to-investigate-the-accuracy-of-a-newspaper-article-posted-on-a-web-site/">Volokh</a> on Jenzabar case, earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/10/trademark-claims-to-silence-critics/">here</a> and <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/11/claim-opponents-lawyers-broke-ethics-rules-when-they-blogged-about-our-case-being-weak/">here</a>]
</li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="December 23 roundup" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/borat/" title="Borat" rel="tag">Borat</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/wage-and-hour-suits/" title="wage and hour suits" rel="tag">wage and hour suits</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/">December 23 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2009/12/december-23-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Popular Mechanics on bad forensics</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a cover story entitled &#8220;CSI Myths: The Shaky Science Behind Forensics&#8220;: Forensic science was not developed by scientists. It was mostly created by cops, who were guided by little more than common sense. And as hundreds of criminal cases begin to unravel, many established forensic practices are coming under fire. PM takes an in-depth [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/">Popular Mechanics on bad forensics</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a cover story entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/4325774.html">CSI Myths: The Shaky Science Behind Forensics</a>&#8220;:<br />
<blockquote>Forensic science was not developed by scientists. It was mostly created by cops, who were guided by little more than common sense. And as hundreds of criminal cases begin to unravel, many established forensic practices are coming under fire. PM takes an in-depth look at the shaky science that has put innocent people behind bars.</p></blockquote>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/135178.html">Radley Balko</a> and <a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/08/03/popular-mechanics-a-handbook-for-judges.aspx?ref=rss">Scott Greenfield</a>.  </p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Popular Mechanics on bad forensics" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/junk-science/" title="junk science" rel="tag">junk science</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/prosecution/" title="prosecution" rel="tag">prosecution</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/">Popular Mechanics on bad forensics</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/popular-mechanics-on-bad-forensics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.328 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-18 21:23:23 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->