<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; medical monitoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/medical-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>BP spill cleanup workers&#8217; suit</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Transocean oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s already a class action demanding medical monitoring. [Dionne Searcey, WSJ Law Blog] Tweet Tags: BP Transocean oil spill, medical monitoring</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/">BP spill cleanup workers&#8217; suit</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s already a class action demanding medical monitoring. [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/07/20/round-two-of-bp-litigation-the-clean-up-suits-begin/?mod=djemlawblog_t">Dionne Searcey, WSJ Law Blog</a>]</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="BP spill cleanup workers&#8217; suit" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/bp-transocean-oil-spill/" title="BP Transocean oil spill" rel="tag">BP Transocean oil spill</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/medical-monitoring/" title="medical monitoring" rel="tag">medical monitoring</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/">BP spill cleanup workers&#8217; suit</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/bp-spill-cleanup-workers-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest issue of Class Action Watch</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=latest-issue-of-class-action-watch</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalist Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Theft Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead paint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The latest issue of the Federalist Society&#8217;s Class Action Watch has many articles of interest to Overlawyered readers: William E. Thomson &#38; Kahn A. Scolnick on the Exxon Shipping case; Jimmy Cline on Arkansas&#8217;s disregard for class action certification standards; Jim Copland on the &#8220;Colossus&#8221; class action; Laurel Harbour on the New Jersey Supreme Court [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/">Latest issue of Class Action Watch</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1187/pub_detail.asp">latest issue of the Federalist Society&#8217;s Class Action Watch</a> has many articles of interest to Overlawyered readers:</p>
<ul>
<li>William E. Thomson &amp; Kahn A. Scolnick on the <em>Exxon Shipping </em>case;</li>
<li>Jimmy Cline on Arkansas&#8217;s disregard for class action certification standards;</li>
<li>Jim Copland on the &#8220;Colossus&#8221; class action;</li>
<li>Laurel Harbour on the New Jersey Supreme Court decision on medical monitoring class actions;</li>
<li>Lyle Roberts on lead-counsel selection in securities class actions;</li>
<li>Mark A. Behrens &amp; Frank Cruz-Alvarez on the lead paint public nuisance decision by the Rhode Island Supreme Court; and</li>
<li>Andrew Grossman, extensively citing to Overlawyered and my brief in discussing the <em>Grand Theft Auto </em>class action settlement rejection.</li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Latest issue of Class Action Watch" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/arkansas/" title="Arkansas" rel="tag">Arkansas</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-action-settlements/" title="class action settlements" rel="tag">class action settlements</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/exxon-shipping-v-baker/" title="Exxon Shipping v. Baker" rel="tag">Exxon Shipping v. Baker</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/federalist-society/" title="Federalist Society" rel="tag">Federalist Society</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/forum-shopping/" title="forum shopping" rel="tag">forum shopping</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/grand-theft-auto/" title="Grand Theft Auto" rel="tag">Grand Theft Auto</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/lead-paint/" title="lead paint" rel="tag">lead paint</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/medical-monitoring/" title="medical monitoring" rel="tag">medical monitoring</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-jersey/" title="New Jersey" rel="tag">New Jersey</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/punitive-damages/" title="punitive damages" rel="tag">punitive damages</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/rhode-island/" title="Rhode Island" rel="tag">Rhode Island</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ted-frank/" title="Ted Frank" rel="tag">Ted Frank</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/">Latest issue of Class Action Watch</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/latest-issue-of-class-action-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: New Jersey Supreme Court rejects Vioxx medical monitoring class action</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vioxx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mark Herrmann has details of Sinclair v. Merck.  The decision also suggests that the New Jersey Supreme Court is going to affirm the intermediate McDarby decision rejecting the use of consumer-fraud law for product-liability claims in New Jersey. Tweet Tags: class actions, medical monitoring, New Jersey, pharmaceuticals, Vioxx</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/">Breaking: New Jersey Supreme Court rejects Vioxx medical monitoring class action</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/2008/06/first-thoughts-on-sinclair-v-merck.html">Mark Herrmann has details</a> of <a href="http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1254845/Sinclair%20Vioxx%20NJ%20Supreme%20Court.pdf"><em>Sinclair v. Merck</em></a>.  The decision also suggests that the New Jersey Supreme Court is going to affirm the intermediate <em>McDarby </em>decision rejecting the use of consumer-fraud law for product-liability claims in New Jersey.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Breaking: New Jersey Supreme Court rejects Vioxx medical monitoring class action" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/medical-monitoring/" title="medical monitoring" rel="tag">medical monitoring</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-jersey/" title="New Jersey" rel="tag">New Jersey</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/pharmaceuticals/" title="pharmaceuticals" rel="tag">pharmaceuticals</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/vioxx/" title="Vioxx" rel="tag">Vioxx</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/">Breaking: New Jersey Supreme Court rejects Vioxx medical monitoring class action</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/breaking-new-jersey-supreme-court-rejects-vioxx-medical-monitoring-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.187 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 20:51:31 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
