Mirapex jackpot justice – literally

Ted Frank — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:41:35 +0000

Gary Charbonneau had a gambling history, including substantial wins, which devolved into compulsive gambling in 2002. He blames this on his Parkinson’s disease medication, Mirapex, which he started taking in 1997. Mirapex changed its warning label to include reports of a correlation while Charbonneau was taking the drug; Charbonneau’s doctor kept prescribing the drug. Nevertheless, Charbonneau was able to persuade a jury that the failure to warn was what was responsible for his $200,000 gambling losses (much of which came from gambling illegally) and resulting marital troubles. The jury verdict even awarded $8 million in punitive damages, giving a whole new meaning to jackpot justice (though one would expect the trial court to reduce this substantially). The only press coverage of this lawsuit, aside from a handful of blogs (Pharmalot; TortsProf; InjuryBoard), is in an op-ed I wrote for today’s Examiner about the case and about how a Supreme Court case and Congressional legislation could affect it. (Theodore H. Frank, “Jackpot justice gets new meaning,” DC Examiner, Aug. 19).

Tags: compulsive gambling, failure to warn, jackpot justice, Mirapex, overwarning, pharmaceuticals, preemption, product liability, punitive damages, Supreme Court, Ted Frank

Mirapex jackpot justice – literally is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Overlawyered » Mirapex

Mirapex jackpot justice – literally