The feds apparently expect their newest incursion into local school autonomy to go as easily as taking candy from a baby, which always was a puzzling figure of speech [New York Times]
{ 2 comments }
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
Posts tagged as:
The feds apparently expect their newest incursion into local school autonomy to go as easily as taking candy from a baby, which always was a puzzling figure of speech [New York Times]
{ 2 comments }
Defying the prospect of lawsuits, more airlines are imposing new rules on “customers of size.” [David Landsel, AirfareWatchdog.com] Earlier here, etc.
{ 3 comments }
Last night’s show.
{ 3 comments }
Regulatory goodies, if there are such a thing, including a mandate that mid-size and bigger employers set aside space for employee breastfeeding, and those nutritional labels on vending machines. [USA Today] See also Point of Law, Nov. 20 (goodies for labor unions).
{ 2 comments }
It’s in a provision “buried deep in the House health care bill”. [Glenn Thrush, Politico, via Katherine Mangu-Ward, Crispy on the Outside]
{ 7 comments }
A remarkable story of government power from Dundee, Scotland [Daily Mail via Steyn/NRO]
{ 21 comments }
Paternalism under the palms [Future of Capitalism]:
The Los Angeles City Council, having already established “a moratorium on new openings of fast-food restaurants” within a 32-square-mile area of South Los Angeles, is now preparing a crackdown on convenience stores that “would prohibit such small neighborhood markets from being closer than one-half mile from one another unless they sold fresh fruit and vegetables,” reports the Los Angeles Times. Link via the American Council on Science and Health.
{ 4 comments }
The new regulations have
drawn considerable negative comment from New York Times readers, and cartoonist/commentator Roz Chast doesn’t seem to hold them in very high regard either.
Only indirectly related — but also pointing up the unlikelihood of getting anything particularly tasty to eat in a Gotham public school environment
– it seems that raw meat is not allowed in NYC school cafeteria kitchens, because it “poses too much of a food-handling challenge” [NYT again]
{ 4 comments }
Get ready for the “next big controversy in the wine business”. [Jeff Siegel, Palate Press]
{ 3 comments }
dietary paternalism in Bloomberg’s NYC and Washington, D.C. doesn’t go over well with writers at Slate [William Saletan, Jacob Weisberg, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Glenn Reynolds] { 2 comments }
{ 3 comments }
“An Indiana court has ruled that a pizza shop must pay for a 340-pound employee’s weight-loss surgery to ensure the success of another operation for a back injury he suffered at work — raising concern among businesses bracing for more such claims.” The case was decided under workers’ compensation law, which is generally more coverage-friendly than workplace liability law. [AP] More: NLJ.
{ 2 comments }
{ 4 comments }
{ 1 comment }
Way to destroy one-of-a-kind eateries [Conor Friedersdorf at Daily Dish] Related: ABA Journal, Nick Gillespie/Reason “Hit and Run”.
{ 14 comments }
The former FDA chief and inveterate nanny-state advocate, David Kessler, has a new book arguing that chain restaurant food is excessively palatable, to the point where it effectively addicts the chains’ customers. Jacob Sullum at Reason accords Kessler’s theories all the respect they deserve.
{ 1 comment }
Dismissing a police officer for being out of shape is one thing, making it stick in court is another.
{ 1 comment }
{ 4 comments }