May 22 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

“Auto-litigation” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

P.S. From The Week, “8 craziest lawsuits of 2011.” This in turn prompted a NYC personal injury attorney named David Waterbury, taking up valuable real estate at Eric Turkewitz’s, to write a counter-article saying the cases weren’t so bad, which involved me in the comments section after I observed Waterbury spreading the trial lawyer-favored line that the “Kara Walton” series of bogus lawsuit stories was a purposeful political fabrication.

Best-of-2011 lists and awards is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

• University of Illinois law professor Larry Ribstein (who commented at my speech there last week): “There was a good turnout and a lot of deserved buzz for this very interesting book. … The book deserves a lot of attention, particularly from law professors and their students as a source of critical perspective on trends in legal education. There is little doubt that the ideas Olson criticizes are hatched mainly in law schools rather than by practicing lawyers and judges, and have led to costly and questionable litigation.” And a response from Scott Greenfield, who says the book’s premise that law professors have great influence over the state of the law “warms the cockles of lawprofs’ hearts given that most of the legal profession considers their influence marginal at best.”
• Ted Frank: “should be required reading for law students, and deserves a place on any Federalist Society member’s bookshelf.”
• Alan Crede writes a lengthy and thoughtful review at Boston Personal Injury Lawyer Blog. He notes that on, e.g., the work of legal clinics, “the traditional taxonomy of liberal and conservative breaks down when you start to deal with many fine-grain legal issues.” And: “There are at least two law professors – Tim Wu and Elizabeth Warren (who is now in the Obama administration) – who possess rock star cachet in progressive circles” and can hardly be charged with any sort of airy unwillingness to engage with the demands of practical law reform. Crede generously concludes “whether you agree with Olson’s conclusions or not, there is a lot that you can learn from ‘Schools For Misrule.’”
• Perhaps my favorite review so far (aside from the great one in Publisher’s Weekly) is from Ira Stoll at Future of Capitalism. It begins: “Of all the possible explanations for Barack Obama, one of the most intriguing is that, like Bill Clinton before him, he was both a law school graduate and a law school professor.” Stoll summarizes many of the book’s themes, particularly as regards “public interest”, human-rights and institutional-reform litigation, and includes this takeaway: “Any donor or foundation wanting to reshape legal education would find Mr. Olson’s book a fine place to begin.”

Schools for Misrule: some early blog reactions is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

More: “Did Wisconsin Police Violate the First Amendment through Selective Enforcement of Limits on Protests?” [Hans Bader]

BoingBoing applauds cops’ lawlessness is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

BoingBoing talks back to a nastygram (again) is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Denis Dutton, 1944-2010 is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

In which we are cited is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

“Your blog hasn’t covered my pet issue. What are you guys scared of?” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

August 28 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system