<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; online speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Posited &#8220;right to be forgotten online&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/posited-right-to-be-forgotten-online/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/posited-right-to-be-forgotten-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This idea, gaining some currency in Europe, would require government to get deeply into the control of privately published information content [Adam Thierer, Scott Greenfield] 

	Tags: Europe, online speech, privacy

	Related posts
	
	EU court: church website violated privacy law (0)
	Bad new idea dept.: privacy takedowns (5)
	August 3 roundup (6)
	“Whatever is Greek, wherever in the world, we want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This idea, gaining some currency in Europe, would require government to get deeply into the control of privately published information content [<a href="http://techliberation.com/2012/01/23/europes-right-to-be-forgotten-privacy-as-internet-censorship/">Adam Thierer</a>, <a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2012/01/28/making-the-internet-better-one-law-at-a-time.aspx?ref=rss">Scott Greenfield</a>] </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/europe/" title="Europe" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/privacy/" title="privacy" rel="tag">privacy</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/11/eu-court-church-website-violated-privacy-law/" title="EU court: church website violated privacy law (November 25, 2003)">EU court: church website violated privacy law</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/bad-new-idea-dept-privacy-takedowns/" title="Bad new idea dept.: privacy takedowns (April 26, 2010)">Bad new idea dept.: privacy takedowns</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/august-3-roundup/" title="August 3 roundup (August 3, 2009)">August 3 roundup</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/%e2%80%9cwhatever-is-greek-wherever-in-the-world-we-want-back%e2%80%9d/" title="“Whatever is Greek, wherever in the world, we want back.” (May 27, 2008)">“Whatever is Greek, wherever in the world, we want back.”</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/posited-right-to-be-forgotten-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul campaign sues John Does over anti-Huntsman video</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/ron-paul-campaign-sues-john-does-over-anti-huntsman-video/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/ron-paul-campaign-sues-john-does-over-anti-huntsman-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies film and videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Presidential candidate Ron Paul’s campaign committee sued the unidentified makers of a video attacking ex-Republican rival Jon Huntsman claiming it falsely implies it was made or endorsed by the Texas congressman.&#8221; [Bloomberg] Paul Alan Levy contends that Rep. Paul, a longtime civil liberties advocate, should know better than to advance arguments that would if accepted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Presidential candidate Ron Paul’s campaign committee sued the unidentified makers of a video attacking ex-Republican rival Jon Huntsman claiming it falsely implies it was made or endorsed by the Texas congressman.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-18/ron-paul-campaign-sues-makers-of-video-deriding-gop-ex-canidate-huntsman.html">Bloomberg</a>] Paul Alan Levy contends that Rep. Paul, a longtime civil liberties advocate, <a href="http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2012/01/ron-paul-should-know-better-than-to-sue-anonymous-speakers-for-political-speech.html">should know better</a> than to advance arguments that would if accepted narrow the legal protections afforded to anonymous political speech. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/campaign-regulation/" title="campaign regulation" rel="tag">campaign regulation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/movies-film-and-videos/" title="movies film and videos" rel="tag">movies film and videos</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ron-paul/" title="Ron Paul" rel="tag">Ron Paul</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/05/so-you-want-to-be-in-pictures/" title="So you want to be in pictures (May 23, 2007)">So you want to be in pictures</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/04/san-francisco-to-vote-on-regulating-blogging/" title="San Francisco to vote on regulating blogging (April 3, 2005)">San Francisco to vote on regulating blogging</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-22-roundup-3/" title="January 22 roundup (January 22, 2010)">January 22 roundup</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/02/february-23-roundup/" title="February 23 roundup (February 23, 2008)">February 23 roundup</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/ron-paul-campaign-sues-john-does-over-anti-huntsman-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA fight heats up</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 05:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad Plumer in the Washington Post summarizes the provisions of the bill as well as the state of play on it in Congress as of mid-month. Although much commentary has assumed that persons determined to visit blocked sites could readily find ways around the SOPA restrictions, David Post notes that the draft bill authorizes the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad Plumer in the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-congresss-online-piracy-bills-in-one-post/2011/12/16/gIQAz4ggyO_blog.html">summarizes</a> the provisions of the bill as well as the state of play on it in Congress as of mid-month. Although much commentary has assumed that persons determined to visit blocked sites could readily find ways around the SOPA restrictions, <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/12/21/code-is-law/">David Post notes</a> that the draft bill authorizes the Attorney General to seek injunctions against persons who assist in circumventing the law, which might include websites that publish &#8220;here&#8217;s how to evade SOPA blocking&#8221; information. Timothy Lee at ArsTechnica notes growing opposition to the bill <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/sopa-faces-growing-opposition-among-conservatives.ars">among conservatives</a>, while Joshua Kopstein at Motherboard reviews a <a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/2011/12/16/dear-congress-it-s-no-longer-ok-to-not-know-how-the-internet-works">comic markup session</a>.  Meanwhile, &#8220;Gibson Guitar &#038; Others On SOPA Supporters List Say They Never Supported The Bill&#8221; [<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111222/16384317175/gibson-guitar-others-sopa-supporters-list-say-they-never-supported-bill.shtml">Mike Masnick, TechDirt</a>] Earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/">here</a> and <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/">here</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/" title="The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221; (December 14, 2011)">The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221;</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/studios-we-shouldnt-have-to-prove-anyone-used-shared-movie-files/" title="Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (June 21, 2008)">Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/" title="SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting (January 5, 2012)">SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;SOPA: An Architecture for Censorship&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proposed law is being promoted as a way of blocking piratical &#8220;rogue&#8221; sites, but once it&#8217;s up and working, and internet providers have begun automatically blocking sites from a list continually updated by the government, it won&#8217;t stop with copyright and trademark infringers. Extending the interdiction to other sorts of sites will be a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposed law is being promoted as a way of blocking piratical &#8220;rogue&#8221; sites, but once it&#8217;s up and working, and internet providers have begun automatically blocking sites from a list continually updated by the government, it won&#8217;t stop with copyright and trademark infringers. Extending the interdiction to other sorts of sites will be a relatively simple and straightforward matter:</p>
<blockquote><p>With the legal framework in place, expanding it to cover other conduct &#8212; obscenity, defamation, “unfair competition,” patent infringement, publication of classified information, advocacy in support of terror groups &#8212; would be a matter of adding a few words to those paragraphs.</p></blockquote>
<p>How long before a sentimental Congress yields to demands to block suicide- or anorexia-promotion sites, or perhaps those accused of glorifying the taking of illegal drugs or profiting from depictions of <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/update-animal-rights-vs-free-speech/">animal cruelty</a>? [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/">Julian Sanchez, Cato</a>, <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-would-sopa-be-used/">more</a>; <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/">earlier</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_74/stephen_demaura_david_segal_candidates_concerned_stop_online_piracy_act-211023-1.html">Stephen DeMaura and David Segal, Roll Call</a> (potential use against political candidates), <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/198687-internet-piracy-bill-a-free-speech-kill-switch">Bill Wilson (ALG), The Hill</a>, Stanford Law Review, <a href="http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/dont-break-internet">&#8220;Don&#8217;t Break the Internet&#8221;</a>. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/06/archived-media-law-free-speech-items-pre-july-2003/" title="Archived media law &#038; free speech items, pre-July 2003 (June 14, 2003)">Archived media law &#038; free speech items, pre-July 2003</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-civil-right-to-be-cruel/" title="The civil right to be cruel (July 9, 2007)">The civil right to be cruel</a> (10)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/latest-customer-complaint-website-suit/" title="Latest customer-complaint-website suit (November 7, 2004)">Latest customer-complaint-website suit</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/08/foxs-thin-pelt/" title="Fox&#8217;s thin pelt (August 12, 2003)">Fox&#8217;s thin pelt</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/05/brand-name-bullies/" title="&#8220;Brand Name Bullies&#8221; (May 28, 2005)">&#8220;Brand Name Bullies&#8221;</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
My Cato colleague Julian Sanchez argues that a bill rapidly moving through Congress would give far too much power to authorities to close down websites without due process, yet would be readily circumvented by actual IP pirates. More: Sanchez/Cato, BoingBoing, Declan McCullagh (software execs blast proposal), Derek Bambauer/Prawfs (&#8221;Six Things Wrong With SOPA&#8221;), Stewart Baker/Volokh.

	Tags: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="448" height="252" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1ngRPuXpCIw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
My Cato colleague Julian Sanchez <a href="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1ngRPuXpCIw">argues</a> that a bill rapidly moving through Congress would give far too much power to authorities to close down websites without due process, yet would be readily circumvented by actual IP pirates. More: <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-new-sopa-now-with-slightly-less-awfulness/">Sanchez/Cato</a>, <a href="http://boingboing.net/tag/sopa">BoingBoing</a>, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57342914-281/silicon-valley-execs-blast-sopa-in-open-letter/">Declan McCullagh</a> (software execs blast proposal), <a href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2011/12/six-things-wrong-with-sopa.html">Derek Bambauer/Prawfs</a> (&#8221;Six Things Wrong With SOPA&#8221;), <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/12/14/sopa-rope-a-dope/">Stewart Baker/Volokh</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/" title="SOPA fight heats up (December 29, 2011)">SOPA fight heats up</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/studios-we-shouldnt-have-to-prove-anyone-used-shared-movie-files/" title="Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (June 21, 2008)">Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/" title="SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting (January 5, 2012)">SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free speech and chilling effects roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/free-speech-and-chilling-effects-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/free-speech-and-chilling-effects-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech in Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;Stamp Out Online Misogyny?&#8221;  [Wendy Kaminer, Brendan O'Neill] 
Jacob Mchangama of Danish think tank CEPOS on blasphemy laws and Islam-critical speech [Nov. 4 FedSoc., PDF]  
Niall Ferguson to sue LRB scribe? &#8220;If he won&#8217;t apologise for calling me a racist, I will persecute him until he does&#8221; [Guardian; more, Atlantic Wire] New York [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>&#8220;Stamp Out Online Misogyny?&#8221;  [<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/11/stamp-out-online-misogyny/248236/">Wendy Kaminer</a>, <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100115868/the-campaign-to-stamp-out-misogyny-online-echoes-victorian-efforts-to-protect-women-from-coarse-language/">Brendan O'Neill</a>] </li>
<li>Jacob Mchangama of Danish think tank CEPOS on blasphemy laws and Islam-critical speech [<a href="http://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/docLib/20111109_Fed-Soc_-_Silenced.pdf">Nov. 4 FedSoc.</a>, PDF]  </li>
<li>Niall Ferguson to sue LRB scribe? &#8220;If he won&#8217;t apologise for calling me a racist, I will persecute him until he does&#8221; [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/nov/26/niall-ferguson-pankaj-mishra-review">Guardian</a>; <strong>more</strong>, <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2011/11/harvard-professors-fight-over-bad-book-review-goes-legal/45526/">Atlantic Wire</a>] New York judge quashes subpoena seeking to identify anonymous bloggers in rabbi-defamation suit [<a href="http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2011/11/the-randy-rabbi-is-rebuffed-again.html">Paul Alan Levy</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;If bullying has gone down, how can it be a pandemic?&#8221; By broadening its definition to include such behaviors as &#8220;eye-rolling&#8221; and pointed non-invitation [<a href="http://www.examiner.com/scotus-in-washington-dc/obama-administration-promotes-panic-over-bullying-despite-fall-bullying">Hans Bader/Examiner</a>, <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/indignant-over-free-speech-trumping-bullying-protection-support-choice/">Neal McCluskey/Cato</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;I strongly recommend an umbrella policy for all bloggers. Defending myself cost nearly $100,000, thankfully paid by insurance.&#8221; [<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/overlawyered/statuses/135101449746128897">@DianaHsieh</a>] </li>
<li>Federal crime under CFAA to lie on the internet? [<a href="http://volokh.com/2011/11/14/my-congressional-testimony-on-the-need-to-narrow-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/">Kerr</a>, <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/11/16/cautiously-optimistic-after-the-judiciary-committee-hearing-on-the-cfaa/">more</a>, <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/11/22/my-assessment-of-senator-leahys-proposed-amendment-to-the-cfaa/">yet more</a>, <a href="http://www.theagitator.com/2011/11/16/congress-obama-administration-want-to-make-it-a-federal-crime-to-lie-on-the-internet/">Balko</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;Will Canada Repeal its Hate Speech Law?&#8221; [<a href="http://www.frumforum.com/will-canada-repeal-its-hate-speech-law">Peter Worthington, Frum Forum</a>]
</li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/bullying/" title="bullying" rel="tag">bullying</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech-in-canada/" title="free speech in Canada" rel="tag">free speech in Canada</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hate-speech/" title="hate speech" rel="tag">hate speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-4-roundup-2/" title="October 4 roundup (October 4, 2011)">October 4 roundup</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/defamation-suit-roundup/" title="Defamation-suit roundup (November 27, 2007)">Defamation-suit roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/supreme-court-of-canada-stands-up-for-the-internet-no-liability-for-linking/" title="&#8220;Supreme Court of Canada Stands Up for the Internet: No Liability for Linking&#8221; (October 20, 2011)">&#8220;Supreme Court of Canada Stands Up for the Internet: No Liability for Linking&#8221;</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/why-they-arent-running-the-cartoons/" title="Why they aren&#8217;t running the cartoons (February 10, 2006)">Why they aren&#8217;t running the cartoons</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/texas-considers-strong-measures-against-lawsuits-intimidating-speech/" title="Texas considers strong measures against lawsuits intimidating speech (April 23, 2011)">Texas considers strong measures against lawsuits intimidating speech</a> (5)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/free-speech-and-chilling-effects-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Supreme Court of Canada Stands Up for the Internet: No Liability for Linking&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/supreme-court-of-canada-stands-up-for-the-internet-no-liability-for-linking/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/supreme-court-of-canada-stands-up-for-the-internet-no-liability-for-linking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech in Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sighs of relief after a decision in a defamation case (Crooks v. Newton) reported on earlier. [Michael Geist] Justice Abella: 
I would conclude that a hyperlink, by itself, should never be seen as “publication” of the content to which it refers.
Adventurous litigants in U.S. defamation cases have occasionally argued otherwise. On Canada, see also proposals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sighs of relief after a decision in a defamation case (Crooks v. Newton) reported on <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/january-7-roundup-2/">earlier</a>. [<a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6069/125/">Michael Geist</a>] Justice Abella: </p>
<blockquote><p>I would conclude that a hyperlink, by itself, should never be seen as “publication” of the content to which it refers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Adventurous litigants in U.S. defamation cases have occasionally argued otherwise. On Canada, see also <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-4-roundup-2/">proposals</a> to criminalize links to so-called hate speech.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/canada/" title="Canada" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech-in-canada/" title="free speech in Canada" rel="tag">free speech in Canada</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hate-speech/" title="hate speech" rel="tag">hate speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/free-speech-and-chilling-effects-roundup/" title="Free speech and chilling effects roundup (November 28, 2011)">Free speech and chilling effects roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/04/update-cair-using-litigation-to-silence-critics/" title="Update: CAIR using litigation to silence critics? (April 25, 2006)">Update: CAIR using litigation to silence critics?</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/sued-by-politico-canadian-blogger-backs-down/" title="Sued by politico, Canadian blogger backs down (February 24, 2006)">Sued by politico, Canadian blogger backs down</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-4-roundup-2/" title="October 4 roundup (October 4, 2011)">October 4 roundup</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/march-19-roundup-2/" title="March 19 roundup (March 19, 2008)">March 19 roundup</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/supreme-court-of-canada-stands-up-for-the-internet-no-liability-for-linking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 4 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-4-roundup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-4-roundup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech in Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Mass torts specialists vs. vendor: &#8220;Prominent Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Ordered to Pay Up After Losing Breach of Contract Trial&#8221; [Above the Law]  
&#8220;You&#8217;ll have to get it on the street&#8221; &#8212; NYC&#8217;s thriving black market in pesticides [NYT, more]   
Benjamin Barton on his new book, &#8220;The Lawyer-Judge Bias&#8221; [Truth on the Market, earlier [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Mass torts specialists vs. vendor: &#8220;Prominent Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Ordered to Pay Up After Losing Breach of Contract Trial&#8221; [<a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2011/09/prominent-plaintiffs-attorneys-ordered-to-pay-up-after-losing-breach-of-contract-trial/">Above the Law</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;You&#8217;ll have to get it on the street&#8221; &#8212; NYC&#8217;s thriving black market in pesticides [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/24/nyregion/chinatown-case-puts-focus-on-illegal-pesticides-in-ny.html">NYT</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/nyregion/12-arrested-in-sales-of-illegal-pesticides-in-chinatown.html?_r=1">more</a>]   </li>
<li>Benjamin Barton on his new book, &#8220;The Lawyer-Judge Bias&#8221; [<a href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2011/09/20/benjamin-barton-on-the-lawyer-judge-bias/">Truth on the Market</a>, earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/new-benjamin-barton-book-the-lawyer-judge-bias-in-the-american-legal-system/">here</a>, etc.]  </li>
<li>Medicare will not press &#8220;secondary payer&#8221; liability clawback claims below $300 [<a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/09/new_medicare_rules_1.html">Miller and Zois</a>, <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2011/08/poorly-drafted-.php">PoL</a>, <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202511027559&#038;slreturn=1">NLJ</a>] </li>
<li>Class action roundup: &#8220;Sleeper&#8221; Supreme Court case raises question of whether class action certification requires consumer harm [<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2011/09/26/sleeper-case-asks-whether-plaintiffs-can-sue-without-an-injury/">Fisher/Forbes</a>]  Important Easterbrook opinion in Aqua Dots case puts curbs on class certification  [<a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2011/08/aqua-dots-produ.php">PoL</a>, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2011/09/02/class-action-worse-than-recall-for-consumers-judge-rules/">Fisher/Forbes</a>, <a href="http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/2011/09/imported-chinese-litigation-returned-to.html">Beck</a>]  Frey, Mortenson et al.: &#8220;The non-fiction class action&#8221; [<a href="http://blog.oup.com/2011/08/non-fiction-class-action/">Trask, OUP blog</a>; earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/welcome-boston-globe-new-yorker-readers/">here</a>, etc.]  </li>
<li>Free speech roundup: Canada proposal could criminalize linking to alleged hate speech [<a href="http://www.hostingindustrywatch.com/2011/08/01/canada-internet-bills-raise-serious-privacy-liberty-concerns/">Hosting Industry Watch</a>] More on Canadian denouncers of speechcrime [<a href="http://www.popehat.com/2011/09/16/he-said-jehova-he-said-jehova/">Ken at Popehat</a>]  You don&#8217;t say: &#8220;$60,000 Ruling Against Truthful Blogger Tests Limits of the First Amendment&#8221; [<a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2011/60000-ruling-against-truthful-blogger-tests-limits-first-amendment">Citizen Media Law</a>]  What happens when a defamation plaintiff asks a court for a takedown order? [<a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2011/online-defamation-injunctive-relief-and-future-prior-restraint">same</a>]  Argentina: subpoenas step up pressure on reporters, editors who report on economy [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/24/world/americas/argentina-judge-subpoenas-newspapers-over-inflation-reports.html">NYT</a> via <a href="http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2011/09/24/argentina-to-press-dont-ask-dont-tell/">Walter Russell Mead</a>]  </li>
<li>Should the law punish energy companies whose operations kill birds? Depends on whose osprey is being gored [<a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2011/09/enforcement-double-standard-oil.html">Perry</a>]  </li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech-in-canada/" title="free speech in Canada" rel="tag">free speech in Canada</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hate-speech/" title="hate speech" rel="tag">hate speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/medicare/" title="Medicare" rel="tag">Medicare</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/nyc/" title="NYC" rel="tag">NYC</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/oil-industry/" title="oil industry" rel="tag">oil industry</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/pesticides/" title="pesticides" rel="tag">pesticides</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/free-speech-and-chilling-effects-roundup/" title="Free speech and chilling effects roundup (November 28, 2011)">Free speech and chilling effects roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/why-they-arent-running-the-cartoons/" title="Why they aren&#8217;t running the cartoons (February 10, 2006)">Why they aren&#8217;t running the cartoons</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/june-10-roundup/" title="June 10 roundup (June 10, 2008)">June 10 roundup</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/defamation-suit-roundup/" title="Defamation-suit roundup (November 27, 2007)">Defamation-suit roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/blog-comment-speechcrimes-in-canada/" title="Blog-comment speechcrimes in Canada (September 17, 2008)">Blog-comment speechcrimes in Canada</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-4-roundup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;It&#8217;s sad that we can&#8217;t&#8230;report on experiences freely&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/its-sad-that-we-cant-report-on-experiences-freely/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/its-sad-that-we-cant-report-on-experiences-freely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reader Helene G. writes: &#8220;I recently joined our local mother&#8217;s club, and I received this message.  It&#8217;s sad that we can&#8217;t use the mother&#8217;s club forum to report on experiences freely, without risk of being sued&#8221;
&#8220;Our forums are a great help to many in our moms community. However, we have a very specific guideline [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reader Helene G. writes: &#8220;I recently joined our local mother&#8217;s club, and I received this message.  It&#8217;s sad that we can&#8217;t use the mother&#8217;s club forum to report on experiences freely, without risk of being sued&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our forums are a great help to many in our moms community. However, we have a very specific guideline relating to negative comments about an individual, company or indeed health clubs.</p>
<p>Specifically, if you&#8217;ve had a negative experience with a vendor or individual, you need to use this format below. NO MATTER HOW BAD THE EXPERIENCE.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Message Title: Negative Experience at <blank></p>
<p>Message: I had a negative experience with <blank>. If you are thinking of hiring/using this vendor, please contact me.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry that in some instances we cannot have more relaxed guidelines, but we have to protect our group. Thanks for understanding.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>(<strong>&#038; welcome</strong> <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2011/09/non-sequiturs-09-29-11">Elie Mystal/Above the Law</a> readers)</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/why-defamation-law-protects-opinion/" title="Why defamation law protects opinion (January 8, 2009)">Why defamation law protects opinion</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/03/update-schenectady-bbs-defamation/" title="Update: Schenectady BBS defamation (March 20, 2005)">Update: Schenectady BBS defamation</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/update-dow-jones-settles-online-defamation-suit/" title="Update: Dow Jones settles online defamation suit (November 20, 2004)">Update: Dow Jones settles online defamation suit</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/04/update-cair-using-litigation-to-silence-critics/" title="Update: CAIR using litigation to silence critics? (April 25, 2006)">Update: CAIR using litigation to silence critics?</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/10/unmasking-anonybloggers-contd/" title="Unmasking anonybloggers, cont&#8217;d (October 18, 2005)">Unmasking anonybloggers, cont&#8217;d</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/its-sad-that-we-cant-report-on-experiences-freely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How To Make A Mockery Of Your Own Law School: Sue Your Critics&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/how-to-make-a-mockery-of-your-own-law-school-sue-your-critics/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/how-to-make-a-mockery-of-your-own-law-school-sue-your-critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is good advice for many other touchy sorts of plaintiffs too, not just for the Thomas M. Cooley Law School of Lansing, Michigan [Mike Masnick, TechDirt, earlier]

	Tags: law schools, libel slander and defamation, Michigan, online speech

	Related posts
	
	A question about the AutoAdmit litigation (5)
	Why defamation law protects opinion (2)
	What Elizabeth Wurtzel tells us about the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is good advice for many other touchy sorts of plaintiffs too, not just for the Thomas M. Cooley Law School of Lansing, Michigan [<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110808/02404115428/how-to-make-mockery-your-own-law-school-sue-your-critics.shtml">Mike Masnick, TechDirt</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/law-school-sues-law-firm-and-bloggers-for-criticizing-its-placement-data/">earlier</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/law-schools/" title="law schools" rel="tag">law schools</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/michigan/" title="Michigan" rel="tag">Michigan</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/a-question-about-the-autoadmit-litigation/" title="A question about the AutoAdmit litigation (August 7, 2008)">A question about the AutoAdmit litigation</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/why-defamation-law-protects-opinion/" title="Why defamation law protects opinion (January 8, 2009)">Why defamation law protects opinion</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/10/what-elizabeth-wurtzel-tells-us-about-the-xoxohth-lawsuit/" title="What Elizabeth Wurtzel tells us about the XOXOHTH lawsuit (October 29, 2007)">What Elizabeth Wurtzel tells us about the XOXOHTH lawsuit</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/updates-3/" title="Updates (July 15, 2007)">Updates</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/03/update-schenectady-bbs-defamation/" title="Update: Schenectady BBS defamation (March 20, 2005)">Update: Schenectady BBS defamation</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/how-to-make-a-mockery-of-your-own-law-school-sue-your-critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

