<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; privilege</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/privilege/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Chevron can depose opposing lawyer in Ecuador case</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/10/chevron-can-depose-opposing-lawyer-in-ecuador-case/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/10/chevron-can-depose-opposing-lawyer-in-ecuador-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 05:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=19817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As evidence mounts of attorney misconduct in a high-profile environmental case, a judge grants the oil company an extraordinary request to put plaintiff&#8217;s counsel Steven Donziger under oath. [Roger Alford, Opinio Juris; earlier]

	Tags: Chevron, environment, privilege

	Related posts
	
	Sunburst Works Refinery $41M verdict (0)
	November 16 roundup (1)
	July 22 roundup (5)
	Inside the Eskimo global-warming suit (3)
	Environmental law roundup [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As evidence mounts of attorney misconduct in a high-profile environmental case, a judge grants the oil company an extraordinary request to put plaintiff&#8217;s counsel Steven Donziger under oath. [<a href="http://opiniojuris.org/2010/10/22/court-orders-donziger-communications-in-chevron-ecuador-battle/">Roger Alford, Opinio Juris</a>; <a href="http://overlawyered.com/?s=chevron+ecuador">earlier</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/chevron/" title="Chevron" rel="tag">Chevron</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/environment/" title="environment" rel="tag">environment</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/privilege/" title="privilege" rel="tag">privilege</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/08/sunburst-works-refinery-41m-verdict/" title="Sunburst Works Refinery $41M verdict (August 23, 2004)">Sunburst Works Refinery $41M verdict</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-16-roundup-3/" title="November 16 roundup (November 16, 2011)">November 16 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/july-22-roundup-2/" title="July 22 roundup (July 22, 2011)">July 22 roundup</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/inside-the-eskimo-global-warming-suit/" title="Inside the Eskimo global-warming suit (May 20, 2008)">Inside the Eskimo global-warming suit</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/environmental-law-roundup/" title="Environmental law roundup (December 16, 2011)">Environmental law roundup</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/10/chevron-can-depose-opposing-lawyer-in-ecuador-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re all lawyers. We don&#8217;t have to answer questions.</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/10/were-all-lawyers-we-dont-have-to-answer-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/10/were-all-lawyers-we-dont-have-to-answer-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not like you manufacturing defendants who are going to have to hand over your hard disks&#8217; contents to us because you&#8217;re mere non-lawyers. &#8220;If a company&#8217;s sole business is licensing and litigating patents, plus it&#8217;s run by lawyers, what isn&#8217;t protected by privilege?&#8221; A subsidiary of patent holding firm Acacia is appealing a judge&#8217;s ruling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not like you manufacturing defendants who are going to have to hand over your hard disks&#8217; contents to us because you&#8217;re mere non-lawyers. &#8220;If a company&#8217;s sole business is licensing and litigating patents, plus it&#8217;s run by lawyers, what isn&#8217;t protected by privilege?&#8221; A subsidiary of patent holding firm Acacia is appealing a judge&#8217;s ruling denying some of its broad privilege claims. (Zusha Elinson, &#8220;IP Case Tests Boundaries of Privilege&#8221;, The Recorder, <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202425375029">Oct. 20</a>).</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/discovery/" title="discovery" rel="tag">discovery</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/patent-trolls/" title="patent trolls" rel="tag">patent trolls</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/privilege/" title="privilege" rel="tag">privilege</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/why-they-call-it-discovery/" title="Why they call it discovery (September 1, 2007)">Why they call it discovery</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/whos-suing-whom-in-the-mobile-business/" title="Who&#8217;s suing whom in the mobile business (August 3, 2011)">Who&#8217;s suing whom in the mobile business</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/white-coats-lawsuit-story-contd/" title="White Coat&#8217;s lawsuit story, cont&#8217;d (June 12, 2009)">White Coat&#8217;s lawsuit story, cont&#8217;d</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/03/what-is-a-photocopier/" title="What is a photocopier? (March 21, 2011)">What is a photocopier?</a> (32)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/09/wall-street-journal-on-patent-trolls/" title="Wall Street Journal on patent trolls (September 16, 2005)">Wall Street Journal on patent trolls</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/10/were-all-lawyers-we-dont-have-to-answer-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

