<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; RIAA and file sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>O lawmakers, heed not the mob&#8217;s wrath</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/o-lawmakers-heed-not-the-mobs-wrath/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/o-lawmakers-heed-not-the-mobs-wrath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They understand not the wisdom of SOPA [Julian Sanchez, Cato at Liberty]

	Tags: RIAA and file sharing

	Related posts
	
	YouTube users at legal risk? (0)
	Yanking RIAA&#8217;s chain (10)
	Websites go dark to protest SOPA/PIPA (9)
	U.K.: &#8220;Lawyers quit litigation against alleged file-sharers&#8221; (0)
	Toward final victory against hooligan listeners! (0)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They understand not the wisdom of SOPA [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sopas-last-gasp-was-the-internet-misinformed/">Julian Sanchez, Cato at Liberty</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/01/yanking-riaas-chain/" title="Yanking RIAA&#8217;s chain (January 11, 2007)">Yanking RIAA&#8217;s chain</a> (10)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/websites-go-dark-to-protest-sopapipa/" title="Websites go dark to protest SOPA/PIPA (January 18, 2012)">Websites go dark to protest SOPA/PIPA</a> (9)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/u-k-lawyers-quit-litigation-against-alleged-file-sharers/" title="U.K.: &#8220;Lawyers quit litigation against alleged file-sharers&#8221; (April 15, 2010)">U.K.: &#8220;Lawyers quit litigation against alleged file-sharers&#8221;</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/toward-final-victory-against-hooligan-listeners/" title="Toward final victory against hooligan listeners! (March 4, 2009)">Toward final victory against hooligan listeners!</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/o-lawmakers-heed-not-the-mobs-wrath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After SOPA protest day</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/after-sopa-protest-day/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/after-sopa-protest-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rogue site legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
What did the protests accomplish? [Image of one-day change in Hill opposition courtesy TechCrunch, PC World, Timothy Lee/Ars Technica] 
Some of the best protests [Ad Age, earlier on Flickr's clever entry and others]  
Going-dark site &#8220;strike&#8221; was a bit like Atlas Shrugged without the monologues [Greve] &#8220;So, nothing like #AS&#8221; [@nickgillespie] &#8220;&#8230;and fewer pirates&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>What did the protests accomplish? [Image of one-day change in Hill opposition <a href="http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/now-outdated-one-day-change.png">courtesy TechCrunch</a>, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/248401/were_sopapipa_protests_a_success_the_results_are_in.html">PC World</a>, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/01/pipa-support-collapses-with-13-new-opponents-in-senate.ars">Timothy Lee/Ars Technica</a>] </li>
<li>Some of the best protests [<a href="http://adage.com/article/digital/web-s-protests-sopa-anti-piracy-legislation/232160/">Ad Age</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/websites-go-dark-to-protest-sopapipa/">earlier</a> on Flickr's clever entry and others]  </li>
<li>Going-dark site &#8220;strike&#8221; was a bit like Atlas Shrugged without the monologues [<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/walterolson/statuses/160182264507011075">Greve</a>] &#8220;So, nothing like #AS&#8221; [<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/walterolson/statuses/160373285396299776">@nickgillespie</a>] &#8220;&#8230;and fewer pirates&#8221; [<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/JohnPMcGuinness/status/160390532214947841">@JohnPMcGuinness</a>] &#8220;That&#8217;s a shame. I want to see Francisco&#8217;s money speech in binary code.&#8221; [<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/BenK84/status/160371719176065024">@BenK84</a>] </li>
<li>Speaking of Citizens United&#8230; [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-google-destroyed-american-democracy/">John Samples/Cato</a>, <a href="http://www.popehat.com/2012/01/19/a-question-for-critics-of-citizens-united-did-corporations-have-a-right-to-join-the-sopapipa-blackout/">Popehat</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/joshgreenman/status/159064220154081280">@joshgreenman</a>]  </li>
<li>Chris Dodd: we could turn off flow of Hollywood politibux if we don&#8217;t get this law [<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71687.html">Politico</a>] &#8220;Win/win!&#8221; [<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/jamespoulos/status/160367252502351872">James Poulos</a>] </li>
<li>Where next? [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/whats-next-for-sopa-and-pipa/">Julian Sanchez, Cato</a>, <a href="http://kotaku.com/5877550/more-senators-abandon-pipa-but-lead-author-says-blackout-sites-wouldnt-have-been-affected">Kotaku</a> ("PIPA not as bad as SOPA" claims), <a href="http://projects.propublica.org/sopa/">roll call</a> via Pro Publica] </li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/campaign-regulation/" title="campaign regulation" rel="tag">campaign regulation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/rogue-site-legislation/" title="rogue site legislation" rel="tag">rogue site legislation</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/" title="The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221; (December 14, 2011)">The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221;</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/studios-we-shouldnt-have-to-prove-anyone-used-shared-movie-files/" title="Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (June 21, 2008)">Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/" title="SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting (January 5, 2012)">SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/after-sopa-protest-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Websites go dark to protest SOPA/PIPA</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/websites-go-dark-to-protest-sopapipa/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/websites-go-dark-to-protest-sopapipa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among those closed today are Wikipedia, Reddit and Twitpic [Mashable, Kravets/Wired; Mike Masnick; Dan Fisher on yesterday's player-piano threat; our SOPA/PIPA coverage; Cato event tomorrow on Capitol Hill via David Boaz]. Matt Sherman: &#8220;Please note that what Google, Reddit and others are doing today is corporate political speech.&#8221; Flickr&#8217;s protest idea is brilliant: it&#8217;s letting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among those closed today are Wikipedia, Reddit and Twitpic [<a href="http://mashable.com/2012/01/17/sopa-companies-dark-list/">Mashable</a>, <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/websites-dark-in-revolt/">Kravets/Wired</a>; <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120117/23002717445/updated-analysis-why-sopa-pipa-are-bad-idea-dangerous-unnecessary.shtml">Mike Masnick</a>; Dan Fisher on <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2012/01/18/sopa-meet-the-player-piano-copyright-threat/">yesterday's player-piano threat</a>; our <a href="http://overlawyered.com/?s=sopa">SOPA/PIPA coverage</a>; <a href="http://www.cato.org/event.php?eventid=8841">Cato event tomorrow</a> on Capitol Hill via <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/today-at-least-britannica-rules-the-web/">David Boaz</a>]. <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/clipperhouse/status/159677018273882112">Matt Sherman</a>: &#8220;Please note that what Google, Reddit and others are doing today is corporate political speech.&#8221; Flickr&#8217;s protest idea is brilliant: it&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.flickr.net/en/2012/01/18/pipa-sopa/">letting users censor each other</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: lawmakers have been <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/18/congressmen-abandon-sopa/">jumping ship</a> on the bills over the course of the day, including Senate co-sponsor <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5877185/pipa-co+sponsor-retreats-from-awful-bill">Mario Rubio (R-Fla.)</a>. (<strong>Bumped</strong> to keep on top of page).</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/01/yanking-riaas-chain/" title="Yanking RIAA&#8217;s chain (January 11, 2007)">Yanking RIAA&#8217;s chain</a> (10)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/u-k-lawyers-quit-litigation-against-alleged-file-sharers/" title="U.K.: &#8220;Lawyers quit litigation against alleged file-sharers&#8221; (April 15, 2010)">U.K.: &#8220;Lawyers quit litigation against alleged file-sharers&#8221;</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/toward-final-victory-against-hooligan-listeners/" title="Toward final victory against hooligan listeners! (March 4, 2009)">Toward final victory against hooligan listeners!</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/websites-go-dark-to-protest-sopapipa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA on the ropes?</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopa-on-the-ropes/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopa-on-the-ropes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome news, if true: key members of Congress are said to be backing away from the rogue-sites legislation as currently written and in particular are willing to drop the hotly contested provisions on domain name blocking. [Timothy Lee, Sandoval/McCullagh, CNET, Mike Masnick/TechDirt] And suddenly the Obama administration is sounding skeptical notes too [Lee] As recently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome news, if true: key members of Congress are said to be backing away from the rogue-sites legislation as currently written and in particular are willing to drop the hotly contested provisions on domain name blocking. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/01/under-voter-pressure-members-of-congress-backpedal-on-sopa.ars">Timothy Lee</a>, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57358947-261/dns-provision-pulled-from-sopa-victory-for-opponents/?tag=mncol;topStories">Sandoval/McCullagh, CNET</a>, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120113/23560217407/sopa-delayed-cantor-promises-it-wont-be-brought-to-floor-until-issues-are-addressed.shtml">Mike Masnick/TechDirt</a>] And suddenly the Obama administration is sounding skeptical notes too [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/01/obama-administration-joins-the-ranks-of-sopa-skeptics.ars">Lee</a>] As recently as last week the copyright enforcement bills were reported to be on a toboggan to quick passage [<a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/lawmakers-seem-intent-approving-sopa-pipa-183328">Industry Standard</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/?s=sopa">earlier</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120116/14480017423/sopapipa-how-far-weve-come-how-far-we-need-to-go.shtml">Masnick</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/" title="The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221; (December 14, 2011)">The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221;</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/studios-we-shouldnt-have-to-prove-anyone-used-shared-movie-files/" title="Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (June 21, 2008)">Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/" title="SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting (January 5, 2012)">SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopa-on-the-ropes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some advocates of the legislation cook the books when they count (and double-count and triple-count) the costs of piracy. [Julian Sanchez, Cato; Mike Masnick, TechDirt]

	Tags: copyright, RIAA and file sharing

	Related posts
	
	YouTube users at legal risk? (0)
	The New Napster? (0)
	The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221; (4)
	Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (5)
	SOPA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some advocates of the legislation cook the books when they count (and double-count and triple-count) the costs of piracy. [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-copyright-industries-con-congress/">Julian Sanchez, Cato</a>; <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120104/04545217274/cato-institute-digs-into-mpaas-own-research-to-show-that-sopa-wouldnt-save-single-net-job.shtml">Mike Masnick, TechDirt</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/" title="The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221; (December 14, 2011)">The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221;</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/studios-we-shouldnt-have-to-prove-anyone-used-shared-movie-files/" title="Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (June 21, 2008)">Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopa-on-the-ropes/" title="SOPA on the ropes? (January 14, 2012)">SOPA on the ropes?</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA fight heats up</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 05:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad Plumer in the Washington Post summarizes the provisions of the bill as well as the state of play on it in Congress as of mid-month. Although much commentary has assumed that persons determined to visit blocked sites could readily find ways around the SOPA restrictions, David Post notes that the draft bill authorizes the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad Plumer in the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-congresss-online-piracy-bills-in-one-post/2011/12/16/gIQAz4ggyO_blog.html">summarizes</a> the provisions of the bill as well as the state of play on it in Congress as of mid-month. Although much commentary has assumed that persons determined to visit blocked sites could readily find ways around the SOPA restrictions, <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/12/21/code-is-law/">David Post notes</a> that the draft bill authorizes the Attorney General to seek injunctions against persons who assist in circumventing the law, which might include websites that publish &#8220;here&#8217;s how to evade SOPA blocking&#8221; information. Timothy Lee at ArsTechnica notes growing opposition to the bill <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/sopa-faces-growing-opposition-among-conservatives.ars">among conservatives</a>, while Joshua Kopstein at Motherboard reviews a <a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/2011/12/16/dear-congress-it-s-no-longer-ok-to-not-know-how-the-internet-works">comic markup session</a>.  Meanwhile, &#8220;Gibson Guitar &#038; Others On SOPA Supporters List Say They Never Supported The Bill&#8221; [<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111222/16384317175/gibson-guitar-others-sopa-supporters-list-say-they-never-supported-bill.shtml">Mike Masnick, TechDirt</a>] Earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/">here</a> and <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/">here</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/" title="The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221; (December 14, 2011)">The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221;</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/studios-we-shouldnt-have-to-prove-anyone-used-shared-movie-files/" title="Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (June 21, 2008)">Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/" title="SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting (January 5, 2012)">SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case against SOPA/&#8221;Protect IP&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
My Cato colleague Julian Sanchez argues that a bill rapidly moving through Congress would give far too much power to authorities to close down websites without due process, yet would be readily circumvented by actual IP pirates. More: Sanchez/Cato, BoingBoing, Declan McCullagh (software execs blast proposal), Derek Bambauer/Prawfs (&#8221;Six Things Wrong With SOPA&#8221;), Stewart Baker/Volokh.

	Tags: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="448" height="252" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1ngRPuXpCIw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
My Cato colleague Julian Sanchez <a href="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1ngRPuXpCIw">argues</a> that a bill rapidly moving through Congress would give far too much power to authorities to close down websites without due process, yet would be readily circumvented by actual IP pirates. More: <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-new-sopa-now-with-slightly-less-awfulness/">Sanchez/Cato</a>, <a href="http://boingboing.net/tag/sopa">BoingBoing</a>, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57342914-281/silicon-valley-execs-blast-sopa-in-open-letter/">Declan McCullagh</a> (software execs blast proposal), <a href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2011/12/six-things-wrong-with-sopa.html">Derek Bambauer/Prawfs</a> (&#8221;Six Things Wrong With SOPA&#8221;), <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/12/14/sopa-rope-a-dope/">Stewart Baker/Volokh</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-fight-heats-up/" title="SOPA fight heats up (December 29, 2011)">SOPA fight heats up</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/youtube-users-at-legal-risk/" title="YouTube users at legal risk? (March 20, 2007)">YouTube users at legal risk?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/the-new-napster/" title="The New Napster? (December 15, 2004)">The New Napster?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/studios-we-shouldnt-have-to-prove-anyone-used-shared-movie-files/" title="Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files (June 21, 2008)">Studios: we shouldn&#8217;t have to prove anyone used shared movie files</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/sopas-hollywood-accounting/" title="SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting (January 5, 2012)">SOPA&#8217;s Hollywood accounting</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 26 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/april-26-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/april-26-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Study of how class action lawyers interact with their named clients [Stephen Meili via Trask] 
California releases numbers on how bounty-hunting lawyers did in 2010 under Prop 65 environmental-warning law [Cal Biz Lit]  
According to the tale, lender errors in foreclosure gave Florida borrower home free and clear. Actual story may be more complicated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Study of how class action lawyers interact with their named clients [<a href="http://www.uakron.edu/dotAsset/1820611.pdf">Stephen Meili</a> via <a href="http://www.classactioncountermeasures.com/2011/03/articles/lawyers/why-are-ignorant-plaintiffs-inadequate/">Trask</a>] </li>
<li>California releases numbers on how bounty-hunting lawyers did in 2010 under <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/prop-65/">Prop 65</a> environmental-warning law [<a href="http://www.calbizlit.com/cal_biz_lit/2011/04/attorney-general-posts-2010-proposition-65-settlements.html">Cal Biz Lit</a>]  </li>
<li>According to the tale, lender errors in foreclosure gave Florida borrower home free and clear. Actual story may be more complicated than that [<a href="http://www.banklawyersblog.com/3_bank_lawyers/2011/04/a-dumb-mistake-or-a-smart-business-decision.html">Funnell</a>] </li>
<li>The very long discovery arm of the Philadelphia, and Pennsylvania, courts [<a href="http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/2011/04/that-giant-sucking-sound-you-hear.html">Drug &#038; Device Law</a>, <a href="http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/2011/03/putting-our-economy-at-risk.html">more</a>]  </li>
<li>UK law firm &#8220;could face big bill&#8221; after sending thousands of file-sharing demand letters [<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/law_firm_could_face_big_bill_for_sending_1000s_of_letters/">ABA Journal</a>]  </li>
<li>Goodbye to men&#8217;s track at U. of Delaware, and the women&#8217;s team is suffering too, as often happens with Title IX [<a href="http://savingsports.blogspot.com/2011/04/how-title-ix-enforcement-harms-both-men.html">Saving Sports</a>]  </li>
<li>OSHA&#8217;s proposed “illness and injury prevention program” (I2P2) termed a &#8220;Super Rule&#8221; with potentially widespread economic impact [<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/265005/proposed-osha-super-rule-peter-kirsanow">Kirsanow, NRO</a>] </li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/discovery/" title="discovery" rel="tag">discovery</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/forum-shopping/" title="forum shopping" rel="tag">forum shopping</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/mortgages/" title="mortgages" rel="tag">mortgages</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/osha/" title="OSHA" rel="tag">OSHA</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/pennsylvania/" title="Pennsylvania" rel="tag">Pennsylvania</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/philadelphia/" title="Philadelphia" rel="tag">Philadelphia</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/prop-65/" title="Prop 65" rel="tag">Prop 65</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/title-ix/" title="Title IX" rel="tag">Title IX</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/philadelphia-courts-attract-forum-shoppers/" title="Philadelphia courts attract forum-shoppers (October 29, 2011)">Philadelphia courts attract forum-shoppers</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/october-2002-archives-part-2/" title="October 2002 archives, part 2 (October 20, 2002)">October 2002 archives, part 2</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/july-13-roundup-2/" title="July 13 roundup (July 13, 2010)">July 13 roundup</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/december-2001-archives-part-1/" title="December 2001 archives, part 1 (December 10, 2001)">December 2001 archives, part 1</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/06/archived-class-action-materials-pre-july-2003/" title="Archived class action materials, pre-July 2003 (June 14, 2003)">Archived class action materials, pre-July 2003</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/april-26-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 25 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/april-25-roundup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/april-25-roundup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages for animal companionship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eat drink and be merry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
10th Circuit: deposition not a &#8220;take-home examination&#8221; [Ronald Miller]  
Class-action suit over salt in Campbell&#8217;s soup [NJ.com]  Boom predicted in suits over claims of healthy food [Ken Odza] 
Roommate indicted in Tyler Clementi suicide  [Scott Greenfield, Beldar]  
&#8220;Ban fraternities&#8221; screed in WSJ: were editors trying to make Caitlin Flanagan look ridiculous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>10th Circuit: deposition not a &#8220;take-home examination&#8221; [<a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/04/sham_affidavits_new_10th_circu_1.html">Ronald Miller</a>]  </li>
<li>Class-action suit over salt in Campbell&#8217;s soup [<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/03/lawsuit_says_camden-based_camp.html">NJ.com</a>]  Boom predicted in suits over claims of healthy food [<a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2011/04/articles/general-information/health-claims-class-actions-set-to-explode/">Ken Odza</a>] </li>
<li>Roommate indicted in Tyler Clementi suicide  [<a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2011/04/21/hate-and-twitter.aspx?ref=rss">Scott Greenfield</a>, <a href="http://beldar.blogs.com/beldarblog/2011/04/beldar-on-hate-crimes.html">Beldar</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;Ban fraternities&#8221; screed in WSJ: were editors trying to make Caitlin Flanagan look ridiculous on purpose? [<a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/04/why-did-caitlin-flanagan-write-such.html">Ann Althouse</a>, <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/119116/">Instapundit</a>] </li>
<li>Emotional value of family dog: &#8220;Seattle should not set bad precedent in pet case&#8221; [<a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2014684459_guest05schedler.html">John W. Schedler, Seattle Times</a>, <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014472670_dogclaim12m.html">background</a>]   </li>
<li>Investigating gas-price speculation and &#8220;price gouging&#8221;: &#8220;Obama tries to cap oil leak with lawyers&#8221; [<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/22/obama-tries-to-cap-oil-leak-with-lawyers/">Neil Munro, Daily Caller</a>]  </li>
<li>Federal law protects peanuts on planes [<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/04/20/peanuts.on.planes/index.html?hpt=T2">CNN Travel</a>]  </li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/allergies/" title="allergies" rel="tag">allergies</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/damages-for-animal-companionship/" title="damages for animal companionship" rel="tag">damages for animal companionship</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/discovery/" title="discovery" rel="tag">discovery</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/eat-drink-and-be-merry/" title="eat drink and be merry" rel="tag">eat drink and be merry</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/oil-industry/" title="oil industry" rel="tag">oil industry</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/salt/" title="salt" rel="tag">salt</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/the-pie-chart-that-doesnt-want-you-to-eat-pie/" title="The &#8220;pie chart that doesn&#8217;t want you to eat pie.&#8221; (June 3, 2011)">The &#8220;pie chart that doesn&#8217;t want you to eat pie.&#8221;</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/food-law-roundup/" title="Food law roundup (July 11, 2011)">Food law roundup</a> (14)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/food-law-roundup-4/" title="Food law roundup (January 27, 2012)">Food law roundup</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/food-and-agriculture-law-roundup/" title="Food and agriculture law roundup (November 18, 2011)">Food and agriculture law roundup</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/february-25-roundup/" title="February 25 roundup (February 25, 2010)">February 25 roundup</a> (5)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/april-25-roundup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$75 trillion damage demand deemed &#8220;absurd&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/03/75-trillion-damage-demand-deemed-absurd/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/03/75-trillion-damage-demand-deemed-absurd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA and file sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal judge Kimba Wood in Manhattan applies some skepticism to the quantum of damages demanded by record companies in copyright actions against file-sharing service LimeWire. [American Lawyer]

	Tags: damages, RIAA and file sharing

	Related posts
	
	RIAA&#8217;s conception of infringement damages (0)
	January 30 roundup (4)
	December 5 roundup (5)
	August 10 roundup (1)
	&#8220;Court orders Jammie Thomas to pay RIAA $1.92 million&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal judge Kimba Wood in Manhattan applies some skepticism to the quantum of damages demanded by record companies in copyright actions against file-sharing service LimeWire. [<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202486102650&#038;Manhattan_Federal_Judge_Kimba_Wood_Calls_Record_Companies_Request_for__Trillion_in_Damages_Absurd_in_Lime_Wire_Copyright_Case">American Lawyer</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/damages/" title="damages" rel="tag">damages</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/riaa-and-file-sharing/" title="RIAA and file sharing" rel="tag">RIAA and file sharing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/05/riaas-conception-of-infringement-damages/" title="RIAA&#8217;s conception of infringement damages (May 23, 2010)">RIAA&#8217;s conception of infringement damages</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/january-30-roundup-4/" title="January 30 roundup (January 30, 2010)">January 30 roundup</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/december-5-roundup-2/" title="December 5 roundup (December 5, 2008)">December 5 roundup</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/august-10-roundup-2/" title="August 10 roundup (August 10, 2009)">August 10 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/court-orders-jammie-thomas-to-pay-riaa-192-million/" title="&#8220;Court orders Jammie Thomas to pay RIAA $1.92 million&#8221; (June 19, 2009)">&#8220;Court orders Jammie Thomas to pay RIAA $1.92 million&#8221;</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/03/75-trillion-damage-demand-deemed-absurd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

