<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will California regulate social networking?</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State Senator Ellen Corbett (D-San Leandro) has vowed to press the idea, the apparent idea being that the government is a better guardian of privacy interests than Facebook and similar services [Jacqueline Otto, CEI "Open Market"] Meanwhile, Geoffrey Manne reports that the feds are itching to start an antitrust or unfair competition case against Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Senator Ellen Corbett (D-San Leandro) has vowed to press the idea, the apparent idea being that the government is a better guardian of privacy interests than Facebook and similar services [<a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2011/06/03/social-networkings-close-call/">Jacqueline Otto, CEI "Open Market"</a>] Meanwhile, Geoffrey Manne reports that the feds are itching to start an antitrust or unfair competition case against Google [<a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2011/06/13/what’s-really-motivating-the-pursuit-of-google/">Main Justice</a> via <a href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2011/06/14/whats-really-motivating-the-pursuit-of-google/">Truth on the Market</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/antitrust/" title="antitrust" rel="tag">antitrust</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/facebook/" title="Facebook" rel="tag">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/federal-trade-commission/" title="Federal Trade Commission" rel="tag">Federal Trade Commission</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/google/" title="Google" rel="tag">Google</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/privacy/" title="privacy" rel="tag">privacy</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/punishing-googles-success/" title="Punishing Google&#8217;s success (December 21, 2011)">Punishing Google&#8217;s success</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/june-23-roundup-2/" title="June 23 roundup (June 23, 2010)">June 23 roundup</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/" title="Unpleasant buzz (November 11, 2010)">Unpleasant buzz</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-13-roundup-2/" title="October 13 roundup (October 13, 2011)">October 13 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/" title="Nowhere to hide (November 15, 2008)">Nowhere to hide</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unpleasant buzz</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick at Popehat is not happy with a class action settlement over consumer non-injury from the Google Buzz service: 
Mason and Ram will apply for, and probably get, $2,125,000 of that [$8.5 million] common fund, for all of their hard work representing thousands of people just like me, who weren’t damaged by Google because they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.popehat.com/2010/11/05/i-want-to-file-an-emotional-distress-claim-against-gary-mason-and-michael-ram/">Patrick at Popehat is not happy</a> with a class action settlement over consumer non-injury from the Google Buzz service: </p>
<blockquote><p>Mason and Ram will apply for, and probably get, $2,125,000 of that [$8.5 million] common fund, for all of their hard work representing thousands of people just like me, who weren’t damaged by Google because they ignored Google’s offer to try Google Buzz, a demonstrated failure that’s used by about seven people (not all of whom are class representatives) nationwide. &#8230;</p>
<p>If there’s any justice, and there isn’t, the Northern District of California will award Mason and Ram a dollar for every consumer who was injured by Google Buzz. That and five hundred more dollars will cover their airfare home.</p></blockquote>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-action-settlements/" title="class action settlements" rel="tag">class action settlements</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/google/" title="Google" rel="tag">Google</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/" title="Will California regulate social networking? (June 16, 2011)">Will California regulate social networking?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/september-23-roundup-2/" title="September 23 roundup (September 23, 2009)">September 23 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/youtube-user-google-wouldnt-let-me-into-its-partner-program/" title="YouTube user: Google wouldn&#8217;t let me into its partner program (August 17, 2008)">YouTube user: Google wouldn&#8217;t let me into its partner program</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/yogurt-marketing-class-action-settles/" title="Yogurt marketing class action settles (September 29, 2009)">Yogurt marketing class action settles</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/why-defamation-law-protects-opinion/" title="Why defamation law protects opinion (January 8, 2009)">Why defamation law protects opinion</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 31 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture and farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Lerach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostile environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s. 17200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Litigation over high-tech products is rife, but major benefits for consumers can be hard to discern [Low End Mac] 
&#8220;United settles with female ex-pilot who found p0rn in cockpits&#8221; [Obscure Store] 
California suit charges negligent &#8220;laying on of hands&#8221; at church service [Lowering the Bar] 
UN resolution against &#8220;defamation of religion&#8221; imperils free speech [Paula [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Litigation over high-tech products is rife, but major benefits for consumers can be hard to discern [<a href="http://lowendmac.com/musings/09mm/class-action-settlement.html">Low End Mac</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;United settles with female ex-pilot who found p0rn in cockpits&#8221; [<a href="http://obscurestore.typepad.com/obscure_store_and_reading/2009/03/united-settles-with-female-expilot-who-found-porn-in-cockpits.html">Obscure Store</a>] </li>
<li>California suit charges negligent &#8220;laying on of hands&#8221; at church service [<a href="http://www.loweringthebar.net/2009/03/another-suit-alleges-negligent-layingonofhands.html">Lowering the Bar</a>] </li>
<li>UN resolution against &#8220;defamation of religion&#8221; imperils free speech [<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0330/p09s02-coop.html">Paula Schriefer, Freedom House/CSM</a>, <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTlhZDMyNDBkOWNiZDNhM2NiYjlkMTExOTRmMDQ4NGY=">Steyn/NR "Corner"</a>, <a href="http://www.secularism.org.uk/108265.html">National Secular Society</a> (U.K.), <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1238385859.shtml">Ilya Somin @ Volokh</a>
</li>
<li>DivorceNetwork.com, social networking for those caught up in family law battles? [<a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2009/03/divorce-as-a-networking-opportunity.html">Ambrogi, Legal BlogWatch</a>]
</li>
<li>Prosecutors behaving badly in Wayne County (Mich.), Miami, Santa Clara County [<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/132425.html">Radley Balko, Reason "Hit and Run"</a>]
</li>
<li>After nine years, the notorious Bill Lerach California-unfair-competition-law suit against Kwikset (over several screws from Taiwan in a lock marked &#8220;Made in America&#8221;) finally winds down [<a href="http://www.cjac.org/blog/2009/03/nothing-kwik-about-kwikset.php">California Civil Justice</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/">earlier</a>] </li>
<li>Oklahoma AG Drew Edmondson to poultry companies: my pals will bankrupt you with massive verdicts unless you settle [<a href="http://legalnewsline.com/news/219717-edmondsons-poultry-lawsuit-may-be-based-on-bad-science">Rizo/Legal NewsLine</a>; <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2007/03/poultry-compani.php">more</a>] </li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/agriculture-and-farming/" title="agriculture and farming" rel="tag">agriculture and farming</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/attorneys-general/" title="attorneys general" rel="tag">attorneys general</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/aviation/" title="aviation" rel="tag">aviation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/bill-lerach/" title="Bill Lerach" rel="tag">Bill Lerach</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/churches/" title="churches" rel="tag">churches</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/divorce/" title="divorce" rel="tag">divorce</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/family-law/" title="family law" rel="tag">family law</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hostile-environment/" title="hostile environment" rel="tag">hostile environment</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/oklahoma/" title="Oklahoma" rel="tag">Oklahoma</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/s-17200/" title="s. 17200" rel="tag">s. 17200</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/technology/" title="technology" rel="tag">technology</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/march-2000-archives-part-2/" title="March 2000 archives, part 2 (March 31, 2000)">March 2000 archives, part 2</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/october-1999-archives-part-1/" title="October 1999 archives, part 1 (October 16, 1999)">October 1999 archives, part 1</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/january-2000-archives-part-2/" title="January 2000 archives, part 2 (January 31, 2000)">January 2000 archives, part 2</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/01/update-happy-cows-ads/" title="Update: &#8220;Happy Cows&#8221; ads (January 16, 2005)">Update: &#8220;Happy Cows&#8221; ads</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/september-2001-archives-part-3/" title="September 2001 archives, part 3 (September 30, 2001)">September 2001 archives, part 3</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nowhere to hide</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyering vs. privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When your litigation opponent subpoenas your Facebook, Amazon, MySpace, Flickr, LinkedIn and (locked) Twitter pages (&#038; Likelihood of Confusion). 

	Tags: discovery, Facebook, lawyering vs. privacy, MySpace, social networking, Twitter

	Related posts
	
	Will California regulate social networking? (0)
	Social media reminders (0)
	September 29 roundup (9)
	November 4 roundup (8)
	November 26 roundup (6)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When your litigation opponent <a href="http://www.ctemploymentlawblog.com/2008/11/articles/hr-issues/conducting-discovery-in-discrimination-claims-are-social-networking-sites-like-facebook-offlimits-or-untapped-treasure-trove/">subpoenas your Facebook, Amazon, MySpace, Flickr, LinkedIn and (locked) Twitter pages</a> (<strong>&#038;</strong> <a href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709">Likelihood of Confusion</a>). </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/discovery/" title="discovery" rel="tag">discovery</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/facebook/" title="Facebook" rel="tag">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/lawyering-vs-privacy/" title="lawyering vs. privacy" rel="tag">lawyering vs. privacy</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/myspace/" title="MySpace" rel="tag">MySpace</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/twitter/" title="Twitter" rel="tag">Twitter</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/" title="Will California regulate social networking? (June 16, 2011)">Will California regulate social networking?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/social-media-reminders/" title="Social media reminders (June 18, 2009)">Social media reminders</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/september-29-roundup/" title="September 29 roundup (September 29, 2008)">September 29 roundup</a> (9)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/november-4-roundup/" title="November 4 roundup (November 4, 2008)">November 4 roundup</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/november-26-roundup-2/" title="November 26 roundup (November 26, 2008)">November 26 roundup</a> (6)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

