<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Will California regulate social networking?</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-california-regulate-social-networking</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>State Senator Ellen Corbett (D-San Leandro) has vowed to press the idea, the apparent idea being that the government is a better guardian of privacy interests than Facebook and similar services [Jacqueline Otto, CEI "Open Market"] Meanwhile, Geoffrey Manne reports that the feds are itching to start an antitrust or unfair competition case against Google [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/">Will California regulate social networking?</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Senator Ellen Corbett (D-San Leandro) has vowed to press the idea, the apparent idea being that the government is a better guardian of privacy interests than Facebook and similar services [<a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2011/06/03/social-networkings-close-call/">Jacqueline Otto, CEI "Open Market"</a>] Meanwhile, Geoffrey Manne reports that the feds are itching to start an antitrust or unfair competition case against Google [<a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2011/06/13/what’s-really-motivating-the-pursuit-of-google/">Main Justice</a> via <a href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2011/06/14/whats-really-motivating-the-pursuit-of-google/">Truth on the Market</a>]</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Will California regulate social networking?" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/antitrust/" title="antitrust" rel="tag">antitrust</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/facebook/" title="Facebook" rel="tag">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/federal-trade-commission/" title="Federal Trade Commission" rel="tag">Federal Trade Commission</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/google/" title="Google" rel="tag">Google</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/privacy/" title="privacy" rel="tag">privacy</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/">Will California regulate social networking?</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/will-california-regulate-social-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unpleasant buzz</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unpleasant-buzz</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Patrick at Popehat is not happy with a class action settlement over consumer non-injury from the Google Buzz service: Mason and Ram will apply for, and probably get, $2,125,000 of that [$8.5 million] common fund, for all of their hard work representing thousands of people just like me, who weren’t damaged by Google because they [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/">Unpleasant buzz</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.popehat.com/2010/11/05/i-want-to-file-an-emotional-distress-claim-against-gary-mason-and-michael-ram/">Patrick at Popehat is not happy</a> with a class action settlement over consumer non-injury from the Google Buzz service: </p>
<blockquote><p>Mason and Ram will apply for, and probably get, $2,125,000 of that [$8.5 million] common fund, for all of their hard work representing thousands of people just like me, who weren’t damaged by Google because they ignored Google’s offer to try Google Buzz, a demonstrated failure that’s used by about seven people (not all of whom are class representatives) nationwide. &#8230;</p>
<p>If there’s any justice, and there isn’t, the Northern District of California will award Mason and Ram a dollar for every consumer who was injured by Google Buzz. That and five hundred more dollars will cover their airfare home.</p></blockquote>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Unpleasant buzz" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-action-settlements/" title="class action settlements" rel="tag">class action settlements</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/google/" title="Google" rel="tag">Google</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/">Unpleasant buzz</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/unpleasant-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 31 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=march-31-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture and farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Lerach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostile environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s. 17200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Litigation over high-tech products is rife, but major benefits for consumers can be hard to discern [Low End Mac] &#8220;United settles with female ex-pilot who found p0rn in cockpits&#8221; [Obscure Store] California suit charges negligent &#8220;laying on of hands&#8221; at church service [Lowering the Bar] UN resolution against &#8220;defamation of religion&#8221; imperils free speech [Paula [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/">March 31 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Litigation over high-tech products is rife, but major benefits for consumers can be hard to discern [<a href="http://lowendmac.com/musings/09mm/class-action-settlement.html">Low End Mac</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;United settles with female ex-pilot who found p0rn in cockpits&#8221; [<a href="http://obscurestore.typepad.com/obscure_store_and_reading/2009/03/united-settles-with-female-expilot-who-found-porn-in-cockpits.html">Obscure Store</a>] </li>
<li>California suit charges negligent &#8220;laying on of hands&#8221; at church service [<a href="http://www.loweringthebar.net/2009/03/another-suit-alleges-negligent-layingonofhands.html">Lowering the Bar</a>] </li>
<li>UN resolution against &#8220;defamation of religion&#8221; imperils free speech [<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0330/p09s02-coop.html">Paula Schriefer, Freedom House/CSM</a>, <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTlhZDMyNDBkOWNiZDNhM2NiYjlkMTExOTRmMDQ4NGY=">Steyn/NR "Corner"</a>, <a href="http://www.secularism.org.uk/108265.html">National Secular Society</a> (U.K.), <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1238385859.shtml">Ilya Somin @ Volokh</a>
</li>
<li>DivorceNetwork.com, social networking for those caught up in family law battles? [<a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2009/03/divorce-as-a-networking-opportunity.html">Ambrogi, Legal BlogWatch</a>]
</li>
<li>Prosecutors behaving badly in Wayne County (Mich.), Miami, Santa Clara County [<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/132425.html">Radley Balko, Reason "Hit and Run"</a>]
</li>
<li>After nine years, the notorious Bill Lerach California-unfair-competition-law suit against Kwikset (over several screws from Taiwan in a lock marked &#8220;Made in America&#8221;) finally winds down [<a href="http://www.cjac.org/blog/2009/03/nothing-kwik-about-kwikset.php">California Civil Justice</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/">earlier</a>] </li>
<li>Oklahoma AG Drew Edmondson to poultry companies: my pals will bankrupt you with massive verdicts unless you settle [<a href="http://legalnewsline.com/news/219717-edmondsons-poultry-lawsuit-may-be-based-on-bad-science">Rizo/Legal NewsLine</a>; <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2007/03/poultry-compani.php">more</a>] </li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="March 31 roundup" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/agriculture-and-farming/" title="agriculture and farming" rel="tag">agriculture and farming</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/attorneys-general/" title="attorneys general" rel="tag">attorneys general</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/aviation/" title="aviation" rel="tag">aviation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/bill-lerach/" title="Bill Lerach" rel="tag">Bill Lerach</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/churches/" title="churches" rel="tag">churches</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/divorce/" title="divorce" rel="tag">divorce</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/family-law/" title="family law" rel="tag">family law</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hostile-environment/" title="hostile environment" rel="tag">hostile environment</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/oklahoma/" title="Oklahoma" rel="tag">Oklahoma</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/s-17200/" title="s. 17200" rel="tag">s. 17200</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/technology/" title="technology" rel="tag">technology</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/">March 31 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/march-31-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nowhere to hide</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nowhere-to-hide</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyering vs. privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When your litigation opponent subpoenas your Facebook, Amazon, MySpace, Flickr, LinkedIn and (locked) Twitter pages (&#038; Likelihood of Confusion). Tweet Tags: discovery, Facebook, lawyering vs. privacy, MySpace, social networking, Twitter</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/">Nowhere to hide</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When your litigation opponent <a href="http://www.ctemploymentlawblog.com/2008/11/articles/hr-issues/conducting-discovery-in-discrimination-claims-are-social-networking-sites-like-facebook-offlimits-or-untapped-treasure-trove/">subpoenas your Facebook, Amazon, MySpace, Flickr, LinkedIn and (locked) Twitter pages</a> (<strong>&#038;</strong> <a href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709">Likelihood of Confusion</a>). </p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Nowhere to hide" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/discovery/" title="discovery" rel="tag">discovery</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/facebook/" title="Facebook" rel="tag">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/lawyering-vs-privacy/" title="lawyering vs. privacy" rel="tag">lawyering vs. privacy</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/myspace/" title="MySpace" rel="tag">MySpace</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/social-networking/" title="social networking" rel="tag">social networking</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/twitter/" title="Twitter" rel="tag">Twitter</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/">Nowhere to hide</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/nowhere-to-hide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.248 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 20:07:31 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
