<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; Stephen Gillers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/stephen-gillers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>American Apparel arbitration, cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/american-apparel-arbitration-contd/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/american-apparel-arbitration-contd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gillers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago I did a brief post, and guestblogger Victoria Pynchon did a longer one, on the unusual sequence of events by which American Apparel and its founder Dov Charney settled a sexual harassment lawsuit for an agreement to pay $1.3 million tied to an (abortive) agreement to send the case to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago I did a <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/10/dov-charney-the-sequel/">brief post</a>, and guestblogger Victoria Pynchon did a <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/10/attempt-to-conjure-fake-victory-out-of-settlement-defendants-attempt-to-subvert-justice-foiled/">longer one</a>, on the unusual sequence of events by which American Apparel and its founder Dov Charney settled a sexual harassment lawsuit for an agreement to pay $1.3 million tied to an (abortive) agreement to send the case to what a judge characterized as a sham arbitration designed to end favorably to the company. The company hadn&#8217;t at that point (so far as I know) responded publicly to the controversy, but shortly thereafter got its side of the dispute more or less on the record as part of a lengthy post at the blog Jezebel (<a href="http://jezebel.com/5071232/dov-charneys-court-case-is-totally-complicated">Oct. 31</a>).  There&#8217;s also a <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/10/30/American-Apparel-Arbitration">related Oct. 30 item on the case at Portfolio</a>. It quotes ubiquitous NYU legal ethicist Stephen Gillers, with whose views this blog is frequently out of step, who &#8220;said he found no real ethical problems with the ginning up of a sham arbitration to issue a press release. &#8216;The lawyers had no duty to insure that the public got the facts or that the issues were resolved based on a real trial before a real tribunal with real evidence.&#8217;&#8221; </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/arbitration/" title="arbitration" rel="tag">arbitration</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/stephen-gillers/" title="Stephen Gillers" rel="tag">Stephen Gillers</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/what-liberal-media-bias-part-dccxv/" title="What liberal media bias? Part DCCXV (May 30, 2008)">What liberal media bias? Part DCCXV</a> (15)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/welcome-national-journal-readers/" title="Welcome National Journal readers (December 19, 2008)">Welcome National Journal readers</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/war-is-peace-freedom-is-slavery-and-trial-lawyer-earmarks-are-consumer-friendly/" title="War is peace, freedom is slavery, and trial lawyer earmarks are &#8220;consumer-friendly&#8221; (January 1, 2008)">War is peace, freedom is slavery, and trial lawyer earmarks are &#8220;consumer-friendly&#8221;</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/08/update-smog-fee-lawyers-snag-237-million/" title="Update: smog fee lawyers snag $23.7 million (August 21, 2004)">Update: smog fee lawyers snag $23.7 million</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/02/unclear-on-the-concept-2/" title="Unclear on the concept (February 27, 2008)">Unclear on the concept</a> (29)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/american-apparel-arbitration-contd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

