Related posts

• Wyeth v. Levine (20)
• The danger of talking to plaintiffs’ attorneys? The Nano class action (9)
• Steve Berman sues Apple over iPods (6)
• Richard Epstein on Wyeth v. Levine (5)
• Report: Apple to auto-limit iPod volume (2)

Related posts

• The danger of talking to plaintiffs’ attorneys? The Nano class action (9)
• Steve Berman sues Apple over iPods (6)
• Report: Apple to auto-limit iPod volume (2)
• October 6 roundup (1)
• July 21 roundup (2)

• Judges overheard chatting in coffee shop about sweetheart class settlement [WageLaw via Paul Karlsgodt's weekly class action blog roundup]
• More attempts to sue/uncover anonymous blog commenters: “I was subpoenaed for a discovery deposition about one of my posts on this blog.” [Medblogger Dr. Wes]
• Thoughts prompted by the latest (NYC) round of litigation over “ladies’ nights” at drinking establishments [David Giacalone, f/k/a]
• Head of state (Bolivia’s Morales) to his lawyer: “If it’s illegal, go ahead and make it legal. That’s what you went to school for.’” [Cato at Liberty]
• Everybody run! Perennial Overlawyered mentionee Steve Berman has a blog [Class Action Law Today via his P.R. guy in Kevin O'Keefe comments]
• When infamous NYC lawyer Burt Pugach calls, hang up [Greenfield]
• Colleague described as “a soap opera doctor” elects to spend more time in the courtroom than in the operating room [Throckmorton]
• Dear Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee: “Please resist the efforts of vaccine-injury plaintiffs’ advocates to define themselves as representatives of ‘the autism community.’” [Kathleen Seidel, Neurodiversity]

Related posts

• Seidel subpoena aftermath (1)
• Watch what you say about lawyers: Marina Tylo, Paul Revere III, Jones Day (5)
• Wakefield, of autism/vaccine scare, struck off UK medical rolls (1)
• Vaccine lawyer subpoenas Kathleen Seidel (22)
• Update: judge quashes Seidel subpoena (5)

Related posts

• The danger of talking to plaintiffs’ attorneys? The Nano class action (9)
• June 2 roundup (3)
• Great moments in lawyer Twitter marketing (6)
• Annals of legal marketing (3)
• “I’ve always thought people would be very concerned if they knew what we were doing” (0)

The Inupiat Eskimos are perfect, jury-worthy plaintiffs. They have occupied their tiny barrier reef, just a few feet above sea level, “since time immemorial,” according to the lawsuit. They are poor. They live in harmony with nature, according to the documentary. (Pay no attention to those all-terrain vehicles zipping around town, and the kid flashing the gang sign.) …

Some judges may be liberal, but they’re not idiots. They know that utilities sold electricity to Americans because their customers wanted to jack up the AC. In fact, there isn’t a utility in America that hasn’t spent the past 20 years begging its customers to use less oil and gas. There is an inconvenient truth if I ever saw one.

Not to be missed (”Eskimos, whales, and luaus…Oh my!”, Boston Globe, May 24).

Related posts

• Inside the Eskimo global-warming suit (3)
• March 4 roundup (9)
• Legal consequences for denying climate-change consensus? (2)
• Why we’re so short of refineries (0)
• Using Twitter to scare up class action plaintiffs (1)

Related posts

• Update: Maine jury hammers Hagens Berman (0)
• Trauma reality-TV show (0)
• The danger of talking to plaintiffs’ attorneys? The Nano class action (9)
• Steve Berman sues Apple over iPods (6)
• Sears website privacy class action (3)

Over time, the two trial lawyers [Stephen Susman of Texas and Steve Berman of Seattle, both familiar to longterm readers of this site] have become convinced that they have the playbook necessary to win big cases against the country’s largest emitters. It’s the same game plan that brought down Big Tobacco. And in Kivalina — where the link between global warming and material damage is strong—they believe they’ve found the perfect challenger.

In February, Berman and Susman—along with two attorneys who have previously worked on behalf of the village and an environmental lawyer specializing in global warming—filed suit in federal court against 24 oil, coal, and electric companies, claiming that their emissions are partially responsible for the coastal destruction in Kivalina. More important, the suit also accuses eight of the firms (American Electric Power, BP America, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Duke Energy, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, and Southern Company) of conspiring to cover up the threat of man-made climate change, in much the same way the tobacco industry tried to conceal the risks of smoking—by using a series of think tanks and other organizations to falsely sow public doubt in an emerging scientific consensus.

(Stephan Faris, “Conspiracy Theory”, The Atlantic, June). For the theory of legally wrongful participation in public debate (as one might call it), as it surfaced in the tobacco litigation, see, for example, this 2006 post.

More background on the suit at the Native American Rights Fund’s blog, here and here, and at attorney Matthew Pawa’s site. Carter Wood at NAM “Shop Floor” links to a report by the American Justice Partnership and Southeastern Legal Foundation (PDF) entitled, “The Most Dangerous Litigation in America: Kivalina“.

Yet more: Northwestern lawprof David Dana has a working paper at SSRN entitled “The Mismatch between Public Nuisance Law and Global Warming” (via Sheila Scheuerman/TortsProf). Abstract:

The federal courts using the common law method of case-by-case adjudication may have institutional advantages over the more political branches, such as perhaps more freedom from interest group capture and more flexibility to tailor decisions to local conditions. Any such advantages, however, are more than offset by the disadvantages of relying on the courts in common resource management in general and in the management of the global atmospheric commons in particular. The courts are best able to serve a useful function resolving climate-related disputes once the political branches have acted by establishing a policy framework and working through the daunting task of allocating property or quasi-property rights in greenhouse gas emissions. In the meantime, states do have a state legislative alternative that is preferable to common law suits, and that federal courts can facilitate without any dramatic innovations in federal preemption or dormant commerce clause doctrine.

Tags: Alaska, Chevron, climate change, environment, Exxon, global warming, Kivalina, Seattle, stephen susman, Steve Berman, tobacco

Related posts

• August 2001 archives, part 1 (0)
• A Climate of Greed Never Changes (14)
• Update: another alcohol suit (1)
• November 2001 archives, part 2 (0)
• November 2000 archives, part 3 (0)

Related posts

• Apple sued over iPod nano scratches (5)
• Use our product or we’ll sue (2)
• The Graphing Calculator Story (0)
• The danger of talking to plaintiffs’ attorneys? The Nano class action (9)
• Steve Berman sues Apple over iPods (6)

Related posts

• Update: another alcohol suit (1)
• Campus taverns: sued if they do… (0)
• What have they done with the old Rose and Crown? (2)
• Updates – June 20 (2)
• Update: Oregon home brewers and vintners (0)

• Two weeks ago we noted that a new online attorney rating site, Avvo.com, was being threatened with a lawsuit by John Henry Browne, a disgruntled Seattle criminal defense attorney. (Jun. 10). Well, whatever the merits or weaknesses of Browne as an attorney, one thing you can say about him is that he doesn’t make idle threats; last week, he filed suit against Avvo. The suit, designated a class action, contends that Avvo’s ratings are flawed. From all accounts, that’s almost certainly true, but as I mentioned in my previous post, it’s not clear that this presents a valid cause of action; Avvo is entitled to rank lawyers differently than John Henry Browne wants them to. In an attempt to get around this problem, the complaint trots out various “consumer protection” arguments using notoriously vague and broad statutes that don’t require that the plaintiffs identify any consumers who have been harmed. (Illustrating perfectly the phenomenon Ted discussed on Jun. 18).

  Oh yes, and Browne also claims in the complaint that “at least two clients” of his fired him (in less than a week!) because of his “average” rating on Avvo. Let’s just say I’m rather skeptical of Mr. Browne’s ability to prove such a claim.

  The law firm handling this class action case? Overlawyered multiple repeat offender Hagens Berman. (Many links.)

• Remember that lawsuit where Illinois Chief Justice Robert Thomas sued the Kane County Chronicle for defamation? (Apr. 2, Nov. 2006) Well, when last we heard, the libel award — originally an absurd $7 million — had been reduced to $4 million by the trial judge. Not surprisingly, the Chronicle still is unsatisfied, and does not feel it can get a fair shake from the very Illinois court system headed by Thomas; it has now filed a federal lawsuit claiming its constitutional rights have been violated. Named in the suit are Thomas, the trial judge who heard the case, and the rest of Thomas’s colleagues on the state Supreme Court.
• Kellogg’s bows to threats of frivolous litigation coming from the Center for “Science” in the “Public Interest”; agrees to limit advertising of its cereals to children.

  Of course, this is portrayed as an issue of advertising, but as Michael Jacobson of CSPI admits, this litigation strategy is simply an attempt to drive products he disapproves of from the market. And now that Kellogg’s has capitulated, certain politicians are trying to force other companies to do the same.

  Originally: Jan. 2006.

• We had previously reported (May 17) that the unfair competition lawsuit between Equal and Splenda had settled. Turns out that the two sides are still fighting, with each side accusing the other of reneging on the deal. (LI)

Related posts

• May 8 roundup (3)
• When a judge sues for defamation, cont’d (0)
• Watch what you say about lawyers, cont’d (7)
• Watch what you say about lawyers dept.: Amiel Cueto (0)
• Updates – September 7 (0)