Related posts

• Wall Street protests roundup (0)
• Texas Senate considers asbestos reform rollback (2)
• On C-SPAN tonight: “Protecting Main Street From Lawsuit Abuse” (3)
• More broadcast appearances (0)
• Microblog 2008-10-31 (0)

Related posts

• January 2002 archives, part 2 (0)
• April 29 roundup (4)
• Vioxx coverage (and more) at Point of Law (0)
• Update: judge tosses anti-vaccinationist’s libel suit (0)
• Update: French court tosses “book review defamation” case (1)

Related posts

• September 21 roundup (0)
• On C-SPAN tonight: “Protecting Main Street From Lawsuit Abuse” (3)
• November 27 roundup (0)
• November 10 roundup (1)
• New at Point of Law (0)

Related posts

• With a little help from their friends (1)
• Watch what you say about lawyers, cont’d (7)
• There’ll always be a Cook County (2)
• The battle for Edwards’s funders (0)
• Texas Senate considers asbestos reform rollback (2)

A friend points out a little nugget of absurdity and political mendacity in the Pelosi health-care bill. Remember Obama’s effort to try a “test” for tort reform? (We don’t actually need a test, since it has worked to lower medical malpractice coverage and help increase access to doctors in states that have tried it.) Well, Pelosi’s bill has an anti-tort-reform measure. On pages 1431-1433 of the 1990-page spellbinder, there is a financial incentive for states to try “alternative medical liability laws.” But look — you don’t get the incentive if you have a law that would “limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.”

In other words, Congress is providing a financial incentive to uncap damages. Marvelous.

Related posts

• Does tort reform affect insurance rates? (2)
• “Why Doctors Are Heading for Texas” (17)
• “Pelosi betrays her own House for a slew of trial lawyers” (0)
• “November Election A Lawyer’s Delight” (1)
• When Clinton and Obama agreed (0)

Related posts

• The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (0)
• Texas Senate considers asbestos reform rollback (2)
• Sen. Cornyn introduces lessons-of-Lerach bill (1)
• On Good Morning America (1)
• On C-SPAN tonight: “Protecting Main Street From Lawsuit Abuse” (3)

As I discussed in recent testimony on Capitol Hill, if one takes conservative estimates from these economic studies and adds it all up, the total cost to the economy from excessive litigation can be estimated to be between $600 billion and $900 billion a year, the vast majority of which is simply wealth destruction. That is between 4 and 6 percent of GNP, a tort tax of between $8,000 and $12,000 a year for an average family of four.

The entire hearing is on YouTube, or you can watch a highlight reel.

Related posts

• On C-SPAN tonight: “Protecting Main Street From Lawsuit Abuse” (3)
• The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (0)
• On Good Morning America (1)
• Notable debate moment (1)
• March 1 roundup (1)

But there are now bills in the Texas House and Senate, SB 1123 (recently reported out of Senate committee) and HB 1811, that seek to undo this by defining “substantial factor” to merely mean that a product “contributed to the [plaintiff’s] cumulative exposure”—whether or not other defendants’ products were far more responsible for a plaintiff’s injury. The effect of this rollback would be to return Texas to the role of asbestos magnet, since it could conceivably create indiscriminate liability for hundreds of innocent businesses in any given case. The effect will be very similar to the infamous Lipke rule in Madison County, Illinois that extracted billions of dollars from the innocent this decade.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has a fact-sheet, as does the Texas Civil Justice League.

Related posts

• “Why Doctors Are Heading for Texas” (17)
• Biden and the trial lawyers (0)
• Update: “Victims and Families United” (0)
• The war over “W” (2)
• Texas Watch: San Antonio State Hospital v. Cowan (0)

If you just prefer reading what I have to say, my written testimony is on-line also:

The total loss to the economy from excessive tort litigation above and beyond a baseline of an employment at will regime and an average industrialized tort system can be estimated at between over $600 billion and over $900 billion a year, 4.3% to 6.5% of GNP, or a tort tax of between $8,000 and $12,000/year for an average family of four. And this is very much a conservative estimate, as other economists find much stronger effects than I have estimated here, as I have not tried to estimate a number of identifiable secondary and tertiary effects of excessive tort litigation on allocation of economic resources, and as I have not tried to estimate the likely effect of recent Congressional expansions of tort liability in the last twelve months.

I was pleased to hear from multiple Congressional staffers who are regular Overlawyered readers: one even surreptitiously added the website into my official biography. Carter Wood talks about the hearing and Senator Cornyn’s remarks over at Point of Law.

Update: video on-line at C-SPAN; my segment begins at 43:15 or so. And C-SPAN2 is rebroadcasting at 4:16 pm Eastern on Tuesday, March 17, which suggests that my appearance will be at about 5 pm Eastern.

Related posts

• June 12 roundup (16)
• On Good Morning America (1)
• For New York-area readers: on WOR radio, 7:10 AM Wednesday (0)
• “Why Doctors Are Heading for Texas” (17)
• “A Stimulus You Can Believe In” (1)

Related posts

• The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (0)
• Texas Senate considers asbestos reform rollback (2)
• Sen. Cornyn introduces lessons-of-Lerach bill (1)
• Rahm Emanuel and compulsory universal service (5)
• On Good Morning America (1)