<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; trademarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Komen breast cancer charity</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/komen-breast-cancer-charity/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/komen-breast-cancer-charity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the trademark-assertiveness front, as readers of this site know, they&#8217;ve been no strangers to controversy. Perhaps as a gesture of goodwill toward critics they&#8217;d consider calling off the lawsuit threats against other legitimate charities that attempt to use the color pink? 

	Tags: trademarks

	Related posts
	
	“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (2)
	Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (2)
	When you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the trademark-assertiveness front, as readers of this site know, they&#8217;ve been no <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/is-trademark-bullying-okay-if-youre-on-the-side-of-the-angels/">strangers</a> to <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/lawsuits-for-the-cure/">controversy</a>. Perhaps as a gesture of goodwill toward <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/susan-g-komen-breast-cancer-charity-yanks-grants-planned-parenthood-mammograms-article-1.1015269">critics</a> they&#8217;d consider calling off the lawsuit threats against other legitimate charities that attempt to use <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/23213212175/breast-cancer-charity-bullying-other-charities-over-trademark.shtml">the color pink</a>? </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/%e2%80%9ccollaboration-not-litigation-ale%e2%80%9d/" title="“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (April 27, 2010)">“Collaboration not Litigation Ale”</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/when-you-hear-monster-they-want-you-to-think-of-them/" title="When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them (December 4, 2008)">When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/08/web-disputes-of-the-future-two-weeks/" title="Web disputes of the future two weeks (August 24, 2007)">Web disputes of the future two weeks</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/10/washington-redskins-nickname-deemed-offensive/" title="Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive (October 30, 2006)">Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/komen-breast-cancer-charity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Village Voice To Stop Suing Over ‘Best Of’ Lists&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/village-voice-to-stop-suing-over-%e2%80%98best-of%e2%80%99-lists/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/village-voice-to-stop-suing-over-%e2%80%98best-of%e2%80%99-lists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Village Voice is giving up on a scheme to force rivals to pay for permission to use the phrase &#8216;best of.&#8217;&#8221; [Paid Content]

	Tags: publishers, trademarks

	Related posts
	
	Update: Fox gets skinned (0)
	MTA vs. freelance publishers (2)
	&#8220;One-Question Interview: Tom Perrotta&#8221; (0)
	&#8220;As so often, aggressive IP lawyers trumped smart business strategy&#8221; (2)
	“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (2)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Village Voice is giving up on a scheme to force rivals to pay for permission to use the phrase &#8216;best of.&#8217;&#8221; [<a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-village-voice-to-stop-suing-over-best-of-lists/">Paid Content</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/publishers/" title="publishers" rel="tag">publishers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/08/update-fox-gets-skinned/" title="Update: Fox gets skinned (August 23, 2003)">Update: Fox gets skinned</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/10/mta-vs-freelance-publishers/" title="MTA vs. freelance publishers (October 5, 2009)">MTA vs. freelance publishers</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/one-question-interview-tom-perrotta/" title="&#8220;One-Question Interview: Tom Perrotta&#8221; (December 24, 2004)">&#8220;One-Question Interview: Tom Perrotta&#8221;</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/09/as-so-often-aggressive-ip-lawyers-trumped-smart-business-strategy/" title="&#8220;As so often, aggressive IP lawyers trumped smart business strategy&#8221; (September 8, 2006)">&#8220;As so often, aggressive IP lawyers trumped smart business strategy&#8221;</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/%e2%80%9ccollaboration-not-litigation-ale%e2%80%9d/" title="“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (April 27, 2010)">“Collaboration not Litigation Ale”</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/village-voice-to-stop-suing-over-%e2%80%98best-of%e2%80%99-lists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The saddest trademark case of 2011&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/the-saddest-trademark-case-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/the-saddest-trademark-case-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 05:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Goldman is not a fan of the parties&#8217; handling of Fancaster v. Comcast, Inc., in which two companies are battling over noncompeting uses of a business name that neither has been able to turn into much of a success. That hasn&#8217;t kept them from shoveling a lot of money at lawyers over three and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Goldman is <a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/im_not_a_fan_of.htm">not a fan</a> of the parties&#8217; handling of Fancaster v. Comcast, Inc., in which two companies are battling over noncompeting uses of a business name that neither has been able to turn into much of a success. That hasn&#8217;t kept them from shoveling a lot of money at lawyers over three and a half years.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/%e2%80%9ccollaboration-not-litigation-ale%e2%80%9d/" title="“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (April 27, 2010)">“Collaboration not Litigation Ale”</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/when-you-hear-monster-they-want-you-to-think-of-them/" title="When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them (December 4, 2008)">When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/08/web-disputes-of-the-future-two-weeks/" title="Web disputes of the future two weeks (August 24, 2007)">Web disputes of the future two weeks</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/10/washington-redskins-nickname-deemed-offensive/" title="Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive (October 30, 2006)">Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/the-saddest-trademark-case-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;SOPA: An Architecture for Censorship&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proposed law is being promoted as a way of blocking piratical &#8220;rogue&#8221; sites, but once it&#8217;s up and working, and internet providers have begun automatically blocking sites from a list continually updated by the government, it won&#8217;t stop with copyright and trademark infringers. Extending the interdiction to other sorts of sites will be a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposed law is being promoted as a way of blocking piratical &#8220;rogue&#8221; sites, but once it&#8217;s up and working, and internet providers have begun automatically blocking sites from a list continually updated by the government, it won&#8217;t stop with copyright and trademark infringers. Extending the interdiction to other sorts of sites will be a relatively simple and straightforward matter:</p>
<blockquote><p>With the legal framework in place, expanding it to cover other conduct &#8212; obscenity, defamation, “unfair competition,” patent infringement, publication of classified information, advocacy in support of terror groups &#8212; would be a matter of adding a few words to those paragraphs.</p></blockquote>
<p>How long before a sentimental Congress yields to demands to block suicide- or anorexia-promotion sites, or perhaps those accused of glorifying the taking of illegal drugs or profiting from depictions of <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/update-animal-rights-vs-free-speech/">animal cruelty</a>? [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/">Julian Sanchez, Cato</a>, <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-would-sopa-be-used/">more</a>; <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/the-case-against-sopaprotect-ip/">earlier</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_74/stephen_demaura_david_segal_candidates_concerned_stop_online_piracy_act-211023-1.html">Stephen DeMaura and David Segal, Roll Call</a> (potential use against political candidates), <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/198687-internet-piracy-bill-a-free-speech-kill-switch">Bill Wilson (ALG), The Hill</a>, Stanford Law Review, <a href="http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/dont-break-internet">&#8220;Don&#8217;t Break the Internet&#8221;</a>. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/online-speech/" title="online speech" rel="tag">online speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/06/archived-media-law-free-speech-items-pre-july-2003/" title="Archived media law &#038; free speech items, pre-July 2003 (June 14, 2003)">Archived media law &#038; free speech items, pre-July 2003</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-civil-right-to-be-cruel/" title="The civil right to be cruel (July 9, 2007)">The civil right to be cruel</a> (10)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/latest-customer-complaint-website-suit/" title="Latest customer-complaint-website suit (November 7, 2004)">Latest customer-complaint-website suit</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/08/foxs-thin-pelt/" title="Fox&#8217;s thin pelt (August 12, 2003)">Fox&#8217;s thin pelt</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/05/brand-name-bullies/" title="&#8220;Brand Name Bullies&#8221; (May 28, 2005)">&#8220;Brand Name Bullies&#8221;</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/sopa-an-architecture-for-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chick-Fil-A vs. &#8220;Eat More Kale,&#8221; cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/chick-fil-a-vs-eat-more-kale-contd/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/chick-fil-a-vs-eat-more-kale-contd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Alan Levy finds it hard to sympathize with either side of the much-noted trademark dispute, and notes that before the restaurant chain sicced its lawyers on him, Vermont t-shirt silk-screener Bo Muller-Moore had himself sought to trademark the &#8220;Kale&#8221; version of the slogan: &#8220;why should Muller-Moore be able to prevent other members of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Alan Levy finds it hard to sympathize with either side of the much-noted trademark dispute, and notes that before the restaurant chain sicced its lawyers on him, Vermont t-shirt silk-screener Bo Muller-Moore had himself sought to trademark the &#8220;Kale&#8221; version of the slogan: &#8220;why should Muller-Moore be able to prevent other members of the public from making T-shirts with the same slogan?&#8221; [<a href="http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2011/12/chik-fil-a-and-eat-more-kale-a-pox-on-both-your-houses.html">CL&#038;P</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/chick-fil-a-is-worried-you-cant-tell-kale-from-chikin/">earlier</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/%e2%80%9ccollaboration-not-litigation-ale%e2%80%9d/" title="“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (April 27, 2010)">“Collaboration not Litigation Ale”</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/when-you-hear-monster-they-want-you-to-think-of-them/" title="When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them (December 4, 2008)">When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/08/web-disputes-of-the-future-two-weeks/" title="Web disputes of the future two weeks (August 24, 2007)">Web disputes of the future two weeks</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/10/washington-redskins-nickname-deemed-offensive/" title="Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive (October 30, 2006)">Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/chick-fil-a-vs-eat-more-kale-contd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Chick-fil-A Is Worried You Can&#8217;t Tell Kale From &#8216;Chikin&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/chick-fil-a-is-worried-you-cant-tell-kale-from-chikin/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/chick-fil-a-is-worried-you-cant-tell-kale-from-chikin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The slogan &#8220;Eat More Kale&#8221; gets a Vermont t-shirt silk-screener in trouble with the fast-food chain. [Gothamist]

	Tags: restaurants, trademarks

	Related posts
	
	Subway descends (7)
	Non-KFC &#8220;Family Feast&#8221; still OK (0)
	Godzilla&#8217;s lawyers would like a word with you (2)
	Derby pie (0)
	Confusion among all NYC&#8217;s various &#8220;Ray&#8217;s&#8221; pizzerias (2)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slogan &#8220;Eat More Kale&#8221; gets a Vermont t-shirt silk-screener in trouble with the fast-food chain. [<a href="http://gothamist.com/2011/11/28/chick-fil-a_is_worried_you_cant_tel.php">Gothamist</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/restaurants/" title="restaurants" rel="tag">restaurants</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/05/subway-descends/" title="Subway descends (May 19, 2010)">Subway descends</a> (7)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/05/non-kfc-family-feast-still-ok/" title="Non-KFC &#8220;Family Feast&#8221; still OK (May 22, 2007)">Non-KFC &#8220;Family Feast&#8221; still OK</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/08/godzillas-lawyers-would-like-a-word-with-you/" title="Godzilla&#8217;s lawyers would like a word with you (August 14, 2010)">Godzilla&#8217;s lawyers would like a word with you</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/derby-pie/" title="Derby pie (April 21, 2008)">Derby pie</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/confusion-among-all-nycs-various-rays-pizzerias/" title="Confusion among all NYC&#8217;s various &#8220;Ray&#8217;s&#8221; pizzerias (June 19, 2009)">Confusion among all NYC&#8217;s various &#8220;Ray&#8217;s&#8221; pizzerias</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/chick-fil-a-is-worried-you-cant-tell-kale-from-chikin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: &#8220;Kellogg Settles &#8216;Toucan Sam&#8217; Dispute With Archaeologists&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-kellogg-settles-toucan-sam-dispute-with-archaeologists/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-kellogg-settles-toucan-sam-dispute-with-archaeologists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A happy ending (kinda) to the cease-and-desist battle that began when the giant food company decided the toucan on the Maya Archaeology Initiative&#8217;s logo was too reminiscent of its Froot Loops mascot. [Kevin Underhill/Forbes via Musing Minds, earlier]

	Tags: trademarks

	Related posts
	
	“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (2)
	Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (2)
	When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A happy ending (kinda) to the cease-and-desist battle that began when the giant food company decided the toucan on the Maya Archaeology Initiative&#8217;s logo was too reminiscent of its Froot Loops mascot. [<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinunderhill/2011/11/18/kellogg-settles-toucan-dispute-with-archaeologists/">Kevin Underhill/Forbes</a> via <a href="http://musing-minds.com/2011/11/18/toucans/">Musing Minds</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/cereal-maker-claims-non-profits-bird-looks-too-much-like-toucan-sam/">earlier</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/%e2%80%9ccollaboration-not-litigation-ale%e2%80%9d/" title="“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (April 27, 2010)">“Collaboration not Litigation Ale”</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/when-you-hear-monster-they-want-you-to-think-of-them/" title="When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them (December 4, 2008)">When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/08/web-disputes-of-the-future-two-weeks/" title="Web disputes of the future two weeks (August 24, 2007)">Web disputes of the future two weeks</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/10/washington-redskins-nickname-deemed-offensive/" title="Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive (October 30, 2006)">Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-kellogg-settles-toucan-sam-dispute-with-archaeologists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notre Dame to Kansas high school: drop that fighting leprechaun logo</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/notre-dame-to-kansas-high-school-drop-that-fighting-leprechaun/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/notre-dame-to-kansas-high-school-drop-that-fighting-leprechaun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Chapman High School, whose athletics teams have been known as the Fighting Irish since 1967, has been formally asked by the University of Notre Dame to change its leprechaun logo due to the college’s trademark on the image.&#8221; [Yardbarker] 

	Tags: football, trademarks

	Related posts
	
	NFL trademark lawyers vs. New Orleans t-shirt sellers (10)
	“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (2)
	Zwebner [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chapman High School, whose athletics teams have been known as the Fighting Irish since 1967, has been formally asked by the University of Notre Dame to change its leprechaun logo due to the college’s trademark on the image.&#8221; [<a href="http://network.yardbarker.com/college_football/article_external/notre_dame_demands_that_kansas_high_school_destroyed_by_tornado_change_logo/7522570">Yardbarker</a>] </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/football/" title="football" rel="tag">football</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/nfl-trademark-lawyers-vs-new-orleans-t-shirt-sellers/" title="NFL trademark lawyers vs. New Orleans t-shirt sellers (January 29, 2010)">NFL trademark lawyers vs. New Orleans t-shirt sellers</a> (10)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/%e2%80%9ccollaboration-not-litigation-ale%e2%80%9d/" title="“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (April 27, 2010)">“Collaboration not Litigation Ale”</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/09/why-would-a-union-favor-its-own-decertification/" title="Why would a union favor its own decertification? (September 14, 2010)">Why would a union favor its own decertification?</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/when-you-hear-monster-they-want-you-to-think-of-them/" title="When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them (December 4, 2008)">When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them</a> (6)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/notre-dame-to-kansas-high-school-drop-that-fighting-leprechaun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 11 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-11-roundup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-11-roundup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
UK panel declines to ban &#8220;I like gin&#8221; tea ad [Campaign] 
Do pics of tree-shaped air fresheners violate trademark rights of product marketer? [PoL] 
Man&#8217;s EU trademark for &#8220;Keep Calm and Carry On&#8221; raises hackles [Maria Bustillos, The Awl] 
When was the last time Congress chose to repeal a law restricting employers? Surely more recently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>UK panel declines to ban &#8220;I like gin&#8221; tea ad [<a href="http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/go/news/article/1089587/aldi-fends-off-alcoholism-complaints/">Campaign</a>] </li>
<li>Do pics of tree-shaped air fresheners violate trademark rights of product marketer? [<a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2011/10/trademark-claim.php">PoL</a>] </li>
<li>Man&#8217;s EU trademark for &#8220;Keep Calm and Carry On&#8221; raises hackles [<a href="http://www.theawl.com/2011/10/keep-calm-and-carry-on-trademark-fight">Maria Bustillos, The Awl</a>] </li>
<li>When was the last time Congress chose to repeal a law restricting employers? Surely more recently than with the Portal to Portal Act of 1947 [<a href="http://employerslawyer.blogspot.com/2011/09/fact-checking-me-congressional.html">Fox, Jottings</a>] </li>
<li>NYC: &#8220;City’s Top Lawyer Details Payouts of $561 Million in Lawsuits&#8221; [<a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/citys-top-lawyer-details-payouts-of-561-million-in-lawsuits/">NYT</a>]  </li>
<li>Calif. Gov. Brown vetoes attorney-backed bill widening fee entitlement where claimed damages not recovered [<a href="http://www.cjac.org/blog/2011/09/another-survey-ranks-ca-as-wor/">CJAC</a>] </li>
<li>Ira Stoll has been assembling a list of cost-free measures to help the economy, #17 is the proposed EPA-curbing Cement Regulatory Relief Act, #13 is &#8220;Eliminate requirements for legal ads in print newspapers in connection with business formation.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/10/cost-free-job-creating-idea-no-17">Future of Capitalism</a>] </li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/alcohol/" title="alcohol" rel="tag">alcohol</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/jerry-brown/" title="Jerry Brown" rel="tag">Jerry Brown</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/nyc/" title="NYC" rel="tag">NYC</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/united-kingdom/" title="United Kingdom" rel="tag">United Kingdom</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/workplace/" title="workplace" rel="tag">workplace</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/july-31-roundup-2/" title="July 31 roundup (July 31, 2008)">July 31 roundup</a> (10)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/april-18-roundup/" title="April 18 roundup (April 18, 2009)">April 18 roundup</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/05/20453-dispute-350000-cost-of-defense/" title="£204.53 dispute, £350,000 cost of defense (May 5, 2005)">£204.53 dispute, £350,000 cost of defense</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/03/what-have-they-done-with-the-old-rose-and-crown/" title="What have they done with the old Rose and Crown? (March 9, 2009)">What have they done with the old Rose and Crown?</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/03/uk-thousands-face-pay-slashes-under-comparable-worth/" title="UK: Thousands face pay slashes under comparable worth (March 20, 2007)">UK: Thousands face pay slashes under comparable worth</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/october-11-roundup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Cereal Maker Claims Non-Profit&#8217;s Bird Looks Too Much Like Toucan Sam&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/cereal-maker-claims-non-profits-bird-looks-too-much-like-toucan-sam/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/cereal-maker-claims-non-profits-bird-looks-too-much-like-toucan-sam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Maya Archaeology Initiative is fighting back against claims by Kellogg North America that a bird depicted in MAI&#8217;s logo is too similar to &#8216;Toucan Sam,&#8217; the fictional spokesbird for Froot Loops cereal.&#8221; In a response to the cease-and-desist letter from Kellogg lawyers, the Central American cultural philanthropy &#8220;noted the differences between the two toucans, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Maya Archaeology Initiative is fighting back against claims by Kellogg North America that a bird depicted in MAI&#8217;s logo is too similar to &#8216;Toucan Sam,&#8217; the fictional spokesbird for Froot Loops cereal.&#8221; In a response to the cease-and-desist letter from Kellogg lawyers, the Central American cultural philanthropy &#8220;noted the differences between the two toucans, including coloration, beak shape, and the fact that MAI&#8217;s bird is based on birds that actually exist in nature.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.loweringthebar.net/2011/08/cereal-maker-claims-non-profits-bird-looks-too-much-like-toucan-sam.html">Lowering the Bar</a>](<strong>&#038; welcome</strong> <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110907/15550615845/kelloggs-stakes-claim-to-toucans-mayan-imagery-issues-cease-and-desist-to-guatemalan-non-profit.shtml">TechDirt</a> readers)</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/04/%e2%80%9ccollaboration-not-litigation-ale%e2%80%9d/" title="“Collaboration not Litigation Ale” (April 27, 2010)">“Collaboration not Litigation Ale”</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/02/zwebner-lawsuits-on-internet-posts/" title="Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (February 17, 2005)">Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/when-you-hear-monster-they-want-you-to-think-of-them/" title="When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them (December 4, 2008)">When you hear &#8220;monster&#8221;, they want you to think of them</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/08/web-disputes-of-the-future-two-weeks/" title="Web disputes of the future two weeks (August 24, 2007)">Web disputes of the future two weeks</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/10/washington-redskins-nickname-deemed-offensive/" title="Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive (October 30, 2006)">Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/09/cereal-maker-claims-non-profits-bird-looks-too-much-like-toucan-sam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

