Much of the criticism of Citizens United stems from the claim that the Constitution does not protect corporations because they are not “real” people. … This essay will demonstrate why the common argument that corporations lack rights because they aren’t people demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of both the nature of corporations and the First Amendment.

Meanwhile, Virginia blogger/attorney Doug Mataconis [via the much missed Larry Ribstein] analyzes a constitutional amendment advanced by a number of Democratic representatives and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) which would, among other provisions, propose to abolish the constitutional rights of incorporated businesses, with the possible exception of rights held by “the press.” The measure would also impose a constitutional prohibition on (not just authorize official regulation of) such businesses’ engagement in “expenditures,” such as buying newspaper ads expressing their views, during initiative and referendum campaigns as well as elections for office.

Along with abolishing incorporated businesses’ rights, the Sanders proposal contains a further provision of high importance (flagged by Eugene Volokh) that would abolish the constitutional rights of any and all non-profits and similar private entities that are “established … to promote business interests,” and would impose on them the same constitutionally mandated silence during initiatives, referenda and the like. Note the results of this language, which we must presume are intentional: in, say, a fight over a ballot measure that would increase some business tax, the citizens’ committee organized to agitate against the tax would be forbidden to expend money upon a determination that it had been “established … to promote business interests.” Such a private group would also be deemed to have no constitutional rights of any other sort — rights against, say, having its meetings stormed and broken up by police. Meanwhile, the citizens’ committee organized to agitate for the tax would retain not only its rights to speak and to spend money on behalf of its views but also all its other constitutional rights. Rarely do politicians, in this country at least, make it so clear in advance that their intent is to silence their opponents.

Who are the lawmakers who would propose such a measure? The House version was introduced by Rep. Theodore Deutch [FL] and its co-sponsors are Reps. Steve Cohen [TN], John Conyers, Jr. [MI], Peter DeFazio [OR], Keith Ellison [MN], Sam Farr [CA], Barney Frank [MA], Marcia Fudge [OH], Raul Grijalva [AZ], Alcee Hastings [FL], Sheila Jackson Lee [TX], “Hank” Johnson, Jr. [GA], Rick Larsen [WA], John Larson [CT], Barbara Lee [CA], Carolyn Maloney [NY], Jim McDermott [WA], Frank Pallone, Jr. [NJ], Chellie Pingree [ME], Charles Rangel [NY], Betty Sutton [OH], Chris Van Hollen [MD], and Peter Welch [VT].

Related posts

• Citizens United, two years out (1)
• “Congressman Seeks to Send Critic to Jail” (0)
• Wyeth v. Levine (20)
• Why they aren’t running the cartoons (4)
• Waxman, Stupak demand info from health insurers (8)

More: Gillibrand’s office says the weakness of the proposal was due to an inadvertent drafting error and that it will be given teeth. C-SPAN covers the hearing, the SEC and Sen. Scott Brown make their views known, Todd Henderson and Larry Ribstein take a contrarian position, and Prof. Bainbridge covers the scholarly testimony.

Related posts

• Busting Congress for insider trading (5)
• October 12 roundup (2)
• November 22 roundup (2)
• February 13 roundup (0)
• Waxman, Stupak demand info from health insurers (8)

Related posts

• Snow globe menace averted (2)
• October 12 roundup (2)
• November 26 roundup (2)
• January 31 roundup (2)
• Imams: we want to “hit [US Airways] where it hurts, the pocketbook” (6)

Related posts

• Hearings on Congressional insider trading (1)
• October 12 roundup (2)
• November 22 roundup (2)
• February 13 roundup (0)
• Waxman, Stupak demand info from health insurers (8)

Related posts

• Ousted Congressman sues anti-abortion PAC for “loss of livelihood” (4)
• September 2000 archives, part 1 (0)
• Roundup – April 9 (4)
• Rep. Dennis Kucinich sues House cafeteria over olive pit in sandwich (27)
• October 25 roundup (4)

Related posts

• Wrongs without remedies dept. (1)
• Waxman, Stupak demand info from health insurers (8)
• Voting on bills without reading them (7)
• Vince Offer – a ShamWow-tastic litigator (3)
• Update: Waukeen McCoy fees denied, sanctioned $25K (0)

Related posts

• November 27 roundup (0)
• Update: Kucinich settles olive-pit suit (17)
• U.K.: “Jury decides that threat of global warming justifies breaking the law” (6)
• Rep. Dennis Kucinich sues House cafeteria over olive pit in sandwich (27)
• October 27 roundup (1)

Related posts

• Rep. Dennis Kucinich sues House cafeteria over olive pit in sandwich (27)
• February 13 roundup (0)
• Zoning against fast food (1)
• White Castle onion rings (0)
• Welcome Orlando Sentinel readers (4)

P.S. Gawker finds video taken five days later on the House floor in which the Ohio representative “looks fine and talks normal” notwithstanding the “serious and permanent dental and oral injuries requiring multiple oral and dental surgeries.” And Daniel Fisher at Forbes:

No indication why Kucinich mulled this lawsuit for three years before filing it…..* The lawsuit alleges negligence and breach of implied warranty.

*Commenter “Mattie” says the SOL in DC for this type of suit is indeed three years, though it would be one year for some other torts.

Who besides the People’s Congressman would be willing to name America’s olive pit safety crisis and call out the Big Pit interests responsible?

P.P.S.: As someone was asking, wasn’t generous government-furnished health insurance — like the kind available to Members of Congress — supposed to cut down on the need for personal injury suits? And Matthew Heller at OnPoint News finds some precedent for the suit.

And further: That was fast, Kucinich says he’s settled the suit (Jan. 28).

Related posts

• Update: ousted Congressman sues opponents for “loss of livelihood” (6)
• Update: Kucinich settles olive-pit suit (17)
• Throwing themselves at rotten tomatoes (1)
• There’s a latex finger cot in my food (4)
• Tampered food? (0)

Related posts

• Update: ousted Congressman sues opponents for “loss of livelihood” (6)
• March 3 roundup (1)
• Compelling disclosure of commenters’ identities (0)
• “Bumping” online item not republication for purposes of defamation law (0)
• Youtube lawsuit of the week: A&P vs. rappers (3)