<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; U.S. House of Representatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>February 29 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=february-29-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation and its reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jackpot justice and New Jersey pharmacies (with both a Whitney Houston and a Ted Frank angle) [Fox, PoL, our Jan. 3 post] New Mexico: &#8220;Trial lawyers object to spaceport limits&#8221; [Las Cruces Bulletin] Dodd-Frank: too big not to fail [The Economist] Robert Teitelman (The Deal) on new Stephen Bainbridge book Corporate Governance After the Financial [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/">February 29 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Jackpot justice and New Jersey pharmacies (with both a Whitney Houston and a Ted Frank angle) [<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/16/new-jersey-settlement-houston-death-highlights-business-culpability-versus/">Fox</a>, <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2012/02/deep-pocket-files-scott-simon-and-harding-pharmacy.php">PoL</a>, our <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/01/n-j-overdoses-on-xanax-collects-4-1-million/">Jan. 3 post</a>]  </li>
<li>New Mexico: &#8220;Trial lawyers object to spaceport limits&#8221; [<a href="http://www.lascrucesbulletin.com/index.php?pSetup=lascrucesbulletin&#038;curDate=20120203&#038;pageToLoad=showFreeArticle.php&#038;type=art&#038;index=01&#038;title=Trial+lawyers+object+to+spaceport+limits">Las Cruces Bulletin</a>]  </li>
<li>Dodd-Frank: too big not to fail [<a href="http://www.economist.com/node/21547784?fb_ref=activity">The Economist</a>]  Robert Teitelman (The Deal) on new Stephen Bainbridge book Corporate Governance After the Financial Crisis [<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-teitelman/stephen-bainbridge-book_b_1291548.html">HuffPo</a>] Securities suits: &#8220;trial lawyers probably won’t be able to defend a defective system forever&#8221; [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2012/02/06/dealpolitik-transatlantic-carlyle-score-two-for-the-plaintiffs-bar/">WSJ Dealpolitik</a>] </li>
<li>Uh-oh: U.K. Labour opposition looks at unleashing U.S.-style class actions [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/feb/10/labour-class-action-consumer-policy-review?newsfeed=true">Guardian</a>] &#8220;U.K. Moves &#8216;No Win, No Fee&#8217; Litigation Reforms to 2013&#8243; [<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202541183886&#038;rss=newswire&#038;slreturn=1">Suzi Ring, Legal Week</a>]   </li>
<li>More on controls on cold medicines as anti-meth measure [<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/meth-laws-oregons-prescription-cold-medicine_n_1290918.html">Radley Balko</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/02/do-we-need-even-tighter-controls-on-sudafed/252637/">Megan McArdle</a>, <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/02/27/scientific-paper-of-the-day-h.html">Xeni Jardin</a>, earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/indiana-grandmother-prosecuted-for-buying-cold-medicine/">here</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/suing-cold-medication-manufacturers-because-drug-dealers-make-drugs-out-of-the-medication/">here</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/?s=sudafed">here</a>]  </li>
<li>Recognizable at a distance: &#8220;In Germany, a Limp Domestic Economy Stifled by Regulation&#8221; [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/business/global/in-germany-a-limp-domestic-economy-stifled-by-regulation.html">NY Times</a>]  </li>
<li>Fewer lawyers in Congress these days [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/02/24/the-lawyer-politician-in-congress-is-on-the-decline/">WSJ Law Blog</a>]  </li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="February 29 roundup" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/germany/" title="Germany" rel="tag">Germany</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/illegal-drugs/" title="illegal drugs" rel="tag">illegal drugs</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-jersey/" title="New Jersey" rel="tag">New Jersey</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-york-times/" title="New York Times" rel="tag">New York Times</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/pharmaceuticals/" title="pharmaceuticals" rel="tag">pharmaceuticals</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/regulation-and-its-reform/" title="regulation and its reform" rel="tag">regulation and its reform</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/securities-litigation/" title="securities litigation" rel="tag">securities litigation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/senate/" title="Senate" rel="tag">Senate</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/spac/" title="spac" rel="tag">spac</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/united-kingdom/" title="United Kingdom" rel="tag">United Kingdom</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/">February 29 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-29-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The STOCK Act and Congressional inside trading</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>DealBreaker and Prof. Bainbridge try to clarify what the proposed ban would do, and address fears that it would criminalize stock trading by persons not employed by Congress who learn of impending legislative developments. Related: Jim Copland. Tweet Tags: Securities and Exchange Commission, Senate, U.S. House of Representatives</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/">The STOCK Act and Congressional inside trading</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2012/02/after-the-stock-act-it-will-still-be-legal-to-trade-on-congressional-inside-information/">DealBreaker</a> and <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2012/02/the-stock-act-will-not-make-whistle-blowing-illegal.html">Prof. Bainbridge</a> try to clarify what the proposed ban would do, and address <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/february-8-roundup-4/">fears</a> that it would criminalize stock trading by persons not employed by Congress who learn of impending legislative developments. Related: <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/2012/02/manhattan-moment-politics-behind-stock-act/275956">Jim Copland</a>.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="The STOCK Act and Congressional inside trading" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/securities-and-exchange-commission/" title="Securities and Exchange Commission" rel="tag">Securities and Exchange Commission</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/senate/" title="Senate" rel="tag">Senate</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/">The STOCK Act and Congressional inside trading</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-stock-act-and-congressional-inside-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;So what if corporations aren&#8217;t people?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=so-what-if-corporations-arent-people</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rights-bearing individuals do not forfeit those rights when they associate in groups&#8221; argue my Cato colleagues Ilya Shapiro and Caitlyn McCarthy in the John Marshall Law Review [SSRN via Cato at Liberty]: Much of the criticism of Citizens United stems from the claim that the Constitution does not protect corporations because they are not &#8220;real&#8221; [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/">&#8220;So what if corporations aren&#8217;t people?&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rights-bearing individuals do not forfeit those rights when they associate in groups&#8221; argue my Cato colleagues Ilya Shapiro and Caitlyn McCarthy in the John Marshall Law Review [<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1873158">SSRN</a> via <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/published-so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/">Cato at Liberty</a>]: </p>
<blockquote><p>Much of the criticism of Citizens United stems from the claim that the Constitution does not protect corporations because they are not &#8220;real&#8221; people. &#8230; This essay will demonstrate why the common argument that corporations lack rights because they aren&#8217;t people demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of both the nature of corporations and the First Amendment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, Virginia blogger/attorney <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/citizens-united-and-the-foolish-attack-on-corporate-personhood/">Doug Mataconis</a> [via the much missed <a href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2011/12/13/abolishing-corporate-personhood-still-stupid/">Larry Ribstein</a>] analyzes a <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.J.RES.90:">constitutional amendment</a> advanced by a number of Democratic representatives and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) which would, among other provisions, propose to abolish the constitutional rights of incorporated businesses, with the possible exception of rights held by &#8220;the press.&#8221; The measure would also impose a constitutional prohibition on (not just authorize official regulation of) such businesses&#8217; engagement in &#8220;expenditures,&#8221; such as buying newspaper ads expressing their views, during initiative and referendum campaigns as well as elections for office. </p>
<p>Along with abolishing incorporated businesses&#8217; rights, the Sanders proposal contains a further provision of high importance (flagged by <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/12/12/proposed-constitutional-amendment-would-strip-pro-business-but-not-anti-business-non-profits-of-first-amendment-rights/">Eugene Volokh</a>) that would abolish the constitutional rights of any and all non-profits and similar private entities that are &#8220;established &#8230; to promote business interests,&#8221; and would impose on them the same constitutionally mandated silence during initiatives, referenda and the like. Note the results of this language, which we must presume are intentional: in, say, a fight over a ballot measure that would increase some business tax, the citizens&#8217; committee organized to agitate <em>against</em> the tax would be forbidden to expend money upon a determination that it had been &#8220;established &#8230; to promote business interests.&#8221; Such a private group would also be deemed to have no constitutional rights of any other sort &#8212; rights against, say, having its meetings stormed and broken up by police. Meanwhile, the citizens&#8217; committee organized to agitate <em>for</em> the tax would retain not only its rights to speak and to spend money on behalf of its views but also all its other constitutional rights. Rarely do politicians, in this country at least, make it so clear in advance that their intent is to silence their opponents.</p>
<p>Who are the lawmakers who would propose such a measure? The House version was introduced by Rep. Theodore Deutch [FL] and its <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:HJ00090:@@@P">co-sponsors</a> are Reps. Steve Cohen [TN], John Conyers,  Jr. [MI], Peter DeFazio [OR], Keith Ellison [MN], Sam Farr [CA], Barney Frank [MA], Marcia Fudge [OH], Raul Grijalva [AZ], Alcee Hastings [FL], Sheila Jackson Lee [TX], &#8220;Hank&#8221; Johnson, Jr. [GA], Rick Larsen [WA], John Larson [CT], Barbara Lee [CA], Carolyn Maloney [NY], Jim McDermott [WA], Frank Pallone, Jr. [NJ], Chellie Pingree [ME], Charles Rangel [NY], Betty Sutton [OH], Chris Van Hollen [MD], and Peter Welch [VT].  </p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="&#8220;So what if corporations aren&#8217;t people?&#8221;" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/constitutional-law/" title="constitutional law" rel="tag">constitutional law</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/">&#8220;So what if corporations aren&#8217;t people?&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/12/so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hearings on Congressional insider trading</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re coming up within the next few days, but Prof. Bainbridge warns that the draft legislation circulating from the office of Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) is &#8220;bizarre&#8221; and &#8220;toothless.&#8221; Earlier here, here, etc. More: Gillibrand&#8217;s office says the weakness of the proposal was due to an inadvertent drafting error and that it will be given [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/">Hearings on Congressional insider trading</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re coming up within the next few days, but <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/11/senator-kirsten-gillibrands-bizzare-and-toothless-version-of-the-stock-act.html">Prof. Bainbridge warns</a> that the draft legislation circulating from the office of Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) is &#8220;bizarre&#8221; and &#8220;toothless.&#8221; Earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/">here</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/">here</a>, etc.</p>
<p><strong>More</strong>: Gillibrand&#8217;s office says the weakness of the proposal was due to an <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/12/gillibrand-claims-shes-wants-a-law-with-teeth.html">inadvertent drafting error</a> and that it will be given teeth. C-SPAN <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/12/c-span-coverage-of-stock-act-hearing.html">covers the hearing</a>, the <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/12/sec-statement-on-the-legality-of-congressioal-insider-trading.html">SEC</a> and <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/12/scott-brown-op-ed-in-favor-the-stock-act.html">Sen. Scott Brown</a> make their views known, Todd Henderson and Larry Ribstein <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69601.html">take a contrarian position</a>, and Prof. Bainbridge <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/12/is-congressional-insider-trading-illegal-under-current-law.html">covers the scholarly testimony</a>. </p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Hearings on Congressional insider trading" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/securities-and-exchange-commission/" title="Securities and Exchange Commission" rel="tag">Securities and Exchange Commission</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/senate/" title="Senate" rel="tag">Senate</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/">Hearings on Congressional insider trading</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hearings-on-congressional-insider-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 22 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=november-22-roundup-3</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RightHaven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vioxx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Furor continues over insider trading by Congress [Roger Parloff/Fortune, Bainbridge ("unimpressed" with reform proposal entitled STOCK Act), earlier] Rep. Bachus disputes claims in Peter Schweizer book [AW, Perry] &#8220;Fort Hood victims&#8217; families seek $750M from feds&#8221; [Kenneth Timmerman, Daily Caller] &#8220;Chicago Lawyer Sues Southwest, Says Airline Breached Free-Drink Coupon Contract&#8221; [ABA Journal] &#8220;Lawyer Solicitation: Penn [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/">November 22 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Furor continues over insider trading by Congress [<a href="http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2011/11/18/insider-trading-congress/">Roger Parloff/Fortune</a>, <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/11/i-have-seen-the-stock-act-and-i-am-unimpressed.html">Bainbridge</a> ("unimpressed" with reform proposal entitled STOCK Act), <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/congressional-insider-trading-is-it-legal/">earlier</a>] Rep. Bachus disputes claims in Peter Schweizer book [<a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/11/bachus-denies-profiting-inside-infromation/45080/">AW</a>, <a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2011/11/cnbc-smackdown-bachus-vs-schweizer.html">Perry</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;Fort Hood victims&#8217; families seek $750M from feds&#8221; [<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/16/fort-hood-victims-families-seek-750m-from-feds/">Kenneth Timmerman, Daily Caller</a>]   </li>
<li>&#8220;Chicago Lawyer Sues Southwest, Says Airline Breached Free-Drink Coupon Contract&#8221; [<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/chicago_lawyer_sues_southwest_says_airline_breached_free-drink_coupon_contr/">ABA Journal</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;Lawyer Solicitation: Penn State Sex Abuse Edition&#8221; [<a href="http://www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com/2011/11/lawyer-solicitation-penn-state-sex-abuse-edition.html">Turkewitz</a>] Slate slags Merck CEO [<a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2011/11/what-media-bias-4.php">Ted Frank</a>]  </li>
<li>Akaka Hawaii-racialization bill, smuggled in through the back door? [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sneaking-race-based-government-through-the-tropical-back-door/">Ilya Shapiro</a>, <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=akaka">background</a>] </li>
<li>Suits over Hurricane Irene electrical outages expected to spread [<a href="http://www.ctlawtribune.com/getarticle.aspx?ID=40488">Connecticut Law Tribune</a>, <a href="http://www.journalinquirer.com/articles/2011/11/12/chris_powell/doc4ebd4f60f3091426147737.txt">Chris Powell</a>]  </li>
<li>Fiasco envy? &#8220;RIAA Thinking Of Backing Righthaven&#8221; [<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111118/11374416816/riaa-thinking-backing-righthaven.shtml">Masnick, TechDirt</a>] &#8220;Righthaven ordered to pay nearly $120,000 in attorney fees, court costs&#8221; [<a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/26/righthaven-ordered-pay-nearly-120000/">VegasInc.</a>, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/us-marshals-turned-loose-to-collect-6372080-from-righthaven.ars">Ars Technica</a>, <a href="http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/beating-righthaven.html">American Power Blog</a>]   </li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="November 22 roundup" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/airlines/" title="airlines" rel="tag">airlines</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/contracts/" title="contracts" rel="tag">contracts</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hawaii/" title="Hawaii" rel="tag">Hawaii</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/military/" title="military" rel="tag">military</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/righthaven/" title="RightHaven" rel="tag">RightHaven</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/senate/" title="Senate" rel="tag">Senate</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/terrorism/" title="terrorism" rel="tag">terrorism</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/vioxx/" title="Vioxx" rel="tag">Vioxx</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/">November 22 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/november-22-roundup-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Busting Congress for insider trading</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=busting-congress-for-insider-trading</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the sensational revelations from Hoover&#8217;s Peter Schweizer on 60 Minutes and elsewhere, the public is now aware of the uncanny investment success that members of the U.S. Congress enjoy when they personally bet on the stocks of companies with business in the capital. But is it lawful for them to be trading on [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/">Busting Congress for insider trading</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the sensational revelations from Hoover&#8217;s Peter Schweizer on 60 Minutes and elsewhere, the public is now aware of the uncanny investment success that members of the U.S. Congress enjoy when they personally bet on the stocks of companies with business in the capital. But is it lawful for them to be trading on inside information? I take up that question in my <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/congressional-insider-trading-is-it-legal/">new Cato at Liberty post</a>. <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2011/11/congressional-insider-trading-congress-is-getting-rich-off-wall-street-and-peter-schweizer-wont-stop.html">Bainbridge</a>, <a href="http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/11/congressional-insider-trading">Stoll</a>, <a href="http://api.twitter.com/#!/AndrewBreitbart/status/136574611121913856">@AndrewBreitbart</a>.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Busting Congress for insider trading" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/securities-and-exchange-commission/" title="Securities and Exchange Commission" rel="tag">Securities and Exchange Commission</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/senate/" title="Senate" rel="tag">Senate</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/">Busting Congress for insider trading</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/busting-congress-for-insider-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: ousted Congressman sues opponents for &#8220;loss of livelihood&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Updating our story of last December: A federal judge has given the go-ahead to former Rep. Steve Dreihaus&#8217;s suit against the anti-abortion Susan B. Anthony List for allegedly falsely characterizing his stands on issues during last year&#8217;s race, thus causing him to lose. Earlier, Driehaus had filed a complaint against the Anthony List under Ohio&#8217;s [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/">Update: ousted Congressman sues opponents for &#8220;loss of livelihood&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updating our story of <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/12/ousted-congressman-sues-anti-abortion-pac-for-loss-of-livelihood/">last December</a>: A federal judge has given the go-ahead to former Rep. Steve Dreihaus&#8217;s suit against the anti-abortion Susan B. Anthony List for allegedly falsely characterizing his stands on issues during last year&#8217;s race, thus causing him to lose. Earlier, Driehaus had filed a complaint against the Anthony List under Ohio&#8217;s remarkable False Statements Law, &#8220;which criminalizes lying about public officials&#8221; and has been assailed by the ACLU among other groups as inconsistent with the First Amendment. [<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/26/sore-losers-whining-to-proceed">Seth McKelvey, Reason</a>; <a href="http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/10/24/failed-democrat-pol-sues-critics-over-election-loss">Peter Roff, U.S. News</a>]</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Update: ousted Congressman sues opponents for &#8220;loss of livelihood&#8221;" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/campaign-regulation/" title="campaign regulation" rel="tag">campaign regulation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ohio/" title="Ohio" rel="tag">Ohio</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/">Update: ousted Congressman sues opponents for &#8220;loss of livelihood&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/update-ousted-congressman-sues-opponents-for-loss-of-livelihood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An end to impunity</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-end-to-impunity</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (LARA), versions of which have been discussed in this space for years, would reverse the 1993 gutting of Rule 11, the federal rule providing sanctions for baseless lawsuits, and would thus establish that lawyers, like other professionals, should expect to be responsible for compensating those they injure by negligence or [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/">An end to impunity</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (LARA), versions of which have been discussed in this space for years, would reverse the 1993 gutting of Rule 11, the federal rule providing sanctions for baseless lawsuits, and would thus establish that lawyers, like other professionals, should expect to be responsible for compensating those they injure by negligence or worse. Early this month LARA won the approval of the House Judiciary Committee, but is unlikely to prevail (this term, at least) in the more Litigation-Lobby-friendly Senate. [<a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2011/07/potential-solutions-for-the-frivolous-lawsuit-of-rule-11-proposals-and-loser-pays.html">Stier</a>, <a href="http://shopfloor.org/2011/07/house-committee-approves-lawsuit-abuse-measure/21882">ShopFloor</a>; earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/april-18-roundup-2/">here</a>, etc.]</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="An end to impunity" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/sanctions/" title="sanctions" rel="tag">sanctions</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/">An end to impunity</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/07/an-end-to-impunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 13 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=february-13-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stella Liebeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party liability for crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=21459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rules for Growth: Promoting Innovation and Growth Through Legal Reform is new book from Kauffman Foundation in which &#8220;formidable&#8221; contributors including Henry Butler, George Priest, and Peter Schuck prescribe pro-growth policy changes across a variety of fields [available at Kauffman or on SSRN via contributor Larry Ribstein, Diana Furchtgott-Roth/Real Clear Markets] Nick Farr is awfully [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/">February 13 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Rules for Growth: Promoting Innovation and Growth Through Legal Reform is new book from Kauffman Foundation in which &#8220;formidable&#8221; contributors including Henry Butler, George Priest, and Peter Schuck prescribe pro-growth policy changes across a variety of fields [available <a href="http://www.kauffman.org/research-and-policy/rules-for-growth.aspx">at Kauffman</a> or on <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1757982">SSRN</a> via contributor <a href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2011/02/08/now-online-rules-for-growth/">Larry Ribstein</a>, <a href="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2011/02/10/legal_reform_as_economic_stimulus_98859.html">Diana Furchtgott-Roth/Real Clear Markets</a>] </li>
<li>Nick Farr is awfully apologetic (not really) for saying those mean things about Hot Coffee, the new documentary film presenting Lawsuit Lobby view of the world [<a href="http://www.abnormaluse.com/2011/02/open-letter-to-joe-consumer-of-pop-tort.html">Abnormal Use</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/susan-saladoff-documentary-hot-coffee-at-sundance/">earlier</a>] Related: <a href="http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-arts/2011/01/former-d-c-lawyer-discusses-film-about-mcdonald-s-coffee-case-video--7625.html">TBD</a>, <a href="http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-arts/2011/01/sundance-2011-with-hot-coffee-former-d-c-lawyer-illuminates-mcdonald-s-case-7844.html">more</a>. <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.bobdorigojones.com/2011/03/18/new-movie-called-“hot-coffee”-deserves-a-warning-of-its-own/">Bob Dorigo Jones</a>.</li>
<li>AEP v. Connecticut global warming case invites courts to supplant other branches&#8217; role [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/american-electric-power-co-v-connecticut/">Ilya Shapiro, Cato</a>]  </li>
<li>Washington jury awards $46 million to victim of shooting spree at  Denny&#8217;s who charged negligent security [<a href="http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/south_king/ken/news/115529629.html">Kent Reporter</a>, <a href="http://www.komonews.com/news/local/115542284.html">KOMO</a>, <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014162996_dennys09m.html">Seattle Times</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/january-7-roundup-2/">earlier</a>] </li>
<li>New bipartisan Congressional Civil Justice Caucus forms on Capitol Hill  [<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/02/new-group-in-congress-pushes-to-change-legal-system.html">BLT</a>, <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2011/02/bipartisan-civi.php">PoL</a>] </li>
<li>Oh, Professor Tribe, your rhetorical moves on the Supreme Court and Obamacare are so transparent [<a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/search/label/Larry%20Tribe">Ann Althouse</a>]  (<strong>&#038;</strong> <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-defenders-grasping-at-straw-men/">Ilya Shapiro</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/opinion/l13health.html">letter in NY Times</a>)</li>
<li>DRI says &#8220;if you [defend] Med Mal cases the news isn’t good,&#8221; new filings show a drop; clients may take different view [<a href="http://forthedefense.org/post/Large-Drop-in-Tort-Filings-Reported-Nationwide.aspx">For the Defense</a>]  James Pinkerton on med-mal reform [<a href="http://seriousmedicinestrategy.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-on-malpractice-reform-no-change.html">Serious Medicine Strategy</a>] Jan. 20 <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/hear_01202011.html">medical liability hearing</a> in the House [<a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2011/01/in-the-house-a-.php">PoL</a>] </li>
<li>Jury: “customer of size” not victim of airline bias [<a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/jury-customer-of-size-not-victim-of-airline-bias/">five years ago on Overlawyered</a>] </li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="February 13 roundup" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/climate-change/" title="climate change" rel="tag">climate change</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/global-warming/" title="global warming" rel="tag">global warming</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/medical-malpractice/" title="medical malpractice" rel="tag">medical malpractice</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/restaurants/" title="restaurants" rel="tag">restaurants</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/senate/" title="Senate" rel="tag">Senate</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/stella-liebeck/" title="Stella Liebeck" rel="tag">Stella Liebeck</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/third-party-liability-for-crime/" title="third party liability for crime" rel="tag">third party liability for crime</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/">February 13 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/02/february-13-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Kucinich settles olive-pit suit</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=21228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Ohio lawmaker gives his side of the story. Earlier here. Tweet Tags: restaurants, U.S. House of Representatives</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/">Update: Kucinich settles olive-pit suit</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ohio lawmaker gives <a href="http://kucinich.us/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=28892&#038;Itemid=2">his side of the story</a>. Earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/rep-dennis-kucinich-sues-house-cafeteria-over-olive-pit-in-sandwich/">here</a>.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Update: Kucinich settles olive-pit suit" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/restaurants/" title="restaurants" rel="tag">restaurants</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/us-house-of-representatives/" title="U.S. House of Representatives" rel="tag">U.S. House of Representatives</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/">Update: Kucinich settles olive-pit suit</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/update-kucinich-settles-olive-pit-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.381 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 20:26:14 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
