Keen to sic the feds on your boss? There’s an app for that, courtesy of the Department of Labor. [Michael Fox]
{ 2 comments }
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
Posts tagged as:
Keen to sic the feds on your boss? There’s an app for that, courtesy of the Department of Labor. [Michael Fox]
{ 2 comments }
{ 4 comments }
“Bookworm,” the Bay Area-based blogger, tells the story of what happened in a case on which she worked, which arose after an employer encountered the interaction of two California laws, one requiring that final wages be paid within three days, another tilting attorneys’ fee awards toward employees in disputes with employers. A highlight: when the California Supreme Court attempted to correct some of the most extreme unfairness arising from the fee rules, it got overridden by the state legislature. [Bookworm Room]
It’s not getting one-ten-thousandth the coverage of Mr. Tasini’s suit against the Huffington Post, perhaps because it’s not based on quite such an exotic set of legal theories. FindLaw pays staffers to write legal blogs and the suit charges that they were encouraged/allowed to work unpaid overtime. [ABA Journal] Eric B. Meyer has more (“Working through lunch may create overtime issues for employers”).
Amid the general hail of dead cats that commentators have aimed at the class action suit claiming to speak for unpaid Huffington Post bloggers, Jack Shafer’s contribution stands out (action “proves that we’re becoming a nation of Winklevosses who file legal motion after legal motion every time a pot of money is spotted….the proper time to negotiate payment for an article is before publication”).
{ 15 comments }
The site generally promised to pay nothing to its bloggers, and has lived up to that promise. [Romenesko/Washington Post, Radley Balko, Atlantic Wire, Coyote (FLSA is a more unreasonable law than you may assume), Max Kennerly ("unjust enrichment" theories not going anywhere), Volokh (next: suits on behalf of unpaid commenters), Lawrence Cunningham ("close to zero" chance of suit prevailing); & followup (with Jack Shafer's views)]
{ 5 comments }
{ 3 comments }
Such is the theme of a legal audio conference. The wave-after-next of employment litigation, presumably, consists of suits by workers infuriated because their employers have curtailed permission for telecommuting on advice of HR lawyers trying to avoid the wage-and-hour suits.
“The calendar [on a U.S. Department of Labor "We Can Help" website] encourages employees to track their arrival and leave times, start and stop times, meal breaks, and other breaks on a daily basis. The distinctions drawn between arrival versus start times and stop versus leave times suggests that the DOL is trolling for potential off-the-clock claims against employers.” [Jon Hyman, Ohio Employer's Law]
An update on lawsuits claiming employees should be on the books for pay and overtime purposes if the employer asks them to carry a BlackBerry [Workplace Prof, NPR, earlier]
New obligations and liabilities for employers, as catalogued by the law firm of Ogletree Deakins.
{ 1 comment }
The test case in the city of Muenster has German municipal officials worried about busted budgets. [Guardian, Telegraph] So-called “don/doff” lawsuits have been a pretty big deal in our own employment law in recent years, although, as our 2008 report from Arkansas indicates, they don’t always have the support of the putative victims.
{ 6 comments }
Lenders have taken over control at a newspaper that for decades served as a libertarian voice whose influence extended far beyond Southern California; lawsuits between members of the founding family played a key role in the paper’s downfall, and an employee classification suit filed on behalf of carriers didn’t help either.
{ 1 comment }
Coyote on the internship crackdown. More: Hyman.
{ 9 comments }