Archived entries before July 2003 can also be found here.

2002: “‘Resounding victory’ for Microsoft“, Nov. 4-5; “Microsoft case and AG contributions“, Apr. 3-4 (& Apr. 15);  “‘Judge orders God to break up into smaller Deities’“, Feb. 8-10.

2001: “Columnist-fest” (proposed settlement), Nov. 27; “Two views of Microsoft ruling“, July 2; “Microsoft v. Goliath” (Robert Samuelson essay), May 30; “Debate on Microsoft case” (Hazlett vs. Auletta), Mar. 2-4. 

2000: “Microsoft wins one” (no direct Supreme Court review), Sept. 27-28; “‘A perverse use of antitrust law’“, Sept. 8-10; “Lenzner: ‘I think what we do is practice law’” (Oracle scandal), July 28-30; “Oracle did it“, June 28; “Cash for trash, and worse?“, June 26; “Jeff MacNelly, RIP” (three good cartoons), June 9-11; “Judge cracks wish bone“, June 8; “Microsoft opinion: the big picture“, May 12; “Microsoft case: commentators” (Samuelson, Tom Watson, Kinsley), April 19; “Bill Gates and the Nasdaq: why didn’t the Munchkins sing?“, April 13; “Krugman on MS: his ‘blood runs cold’“, April 11; “Silicon siege“, April 7-9; “Columnist-fest” (Larry Kudlow on $80B drop in MS stock evaluation), April 6; “Microsoft violated antitrust law, judge rules“, April 4; “Microsoft Windows downgrade” (parody site), March 27; “Hiring talent from the opposing camp” (co. hires prominent plaintiff’s lawyer Steven Berman), Feb. 28; “Microsoft temps can sue for stock options“, Jan. 11 (& see Feb. 17; letters, Dec. 20).

1999: “In race to sue Microsoft, some trip“, Dec. 23-26; “Roundup“, Dec. 3-5; “‘Actions without class’“, Dec. 2; “Class actions vs. high-tech“, Nov. 23; “Vice President gets an earful“, Nov. 22; “Roundup“, Nov. 17; “Fins circle in water“, Nov. 13-14; “Roundup“, Nov. 11; “Guest editorials“, Nov. 8; “Why doesn’t Windows cost more?“, Oct. 27; “Are you sure you want to delete ‘Microsoft’?“, Oct. 11; “The ‘we sue Microsoft’ business plan“, Aug. 31, 1999 (& update, Nov. 30, 2000).

Filed under: antitrust, technology