“[Attorney Allen] Lowy said that he was not fazed by the suggestion that [New Jersey Gov. James] McGreevey might resign. He said he and Mr. [Golan] Cipel were not seeking a financial settlement, ‘We weren’t concerned with the money,’ Mr. Lowy said.” (David Kocieniewski, “A Governor’s Downfall, in 20 Wrenching Days”, New York Times, Aug. 15). “Sources in McGreevey’s administration said Saturday that Cipel originally demanded $50 million [to not press a harassment complaint] but the figure dropped to $5 million as negotiations progressed.” (“Man in N.J. Gov. Case Says He Is Straight”, AP/ABCNews.com, Aug. 15). More: New Jersey Law Journal, Sept. 8.
Archive for August, 2004
Batch of reader letters
Four more entries from our correspondence stack on our letters page. Topics include: why autopsies don’t figure more prominently in malpractice cases, whether the legal climate deserves all the blame for the shrinkage in Philadelphia obstetrics, what happens when you tell your homeowners’ insurance company that you run a controversial website, and another lawsuit challenging the 1998 tobacco settlement.
When the judge is a curmudge, cont’d
Is there something about the name Sam that does it? U.S. District Judge Sam Kent in Texas has long been famed for his colorful excoriations of lawyers in his court whose practice does not come up to his standards (see May 14, Sept. 6, 2001 and links from there). Now, per Curmudgeonly Clerk (Aug. 11) who got it from Begging to Differ, Judge Sam Sparks, another federal district court judge in Texas, has just penned an opinion complaining that his duties in supervising the lawyers in a commercial dispute now resemble those of “a person who supervised kindergarten. … The Court simply wants to scream to these lawyers, ‘Get a life'”. (Klein-Becker v. Stanley, PDF)
Update: Virginia primitive, take 6
More developments regarding Virginia’s antigay law, much criticized in this space (see May 31 and links from there): the state’s Attorney General, Jerry Kilgore, has put forth an opinion (which of course does not bind the courts) construing the statute narrowly so as not to restrict persons of the same sex from entering private contractual arrangements that convey any “rights or privileges not exclusive to the institution of marriage”. (“The law”, Style Weekly (Richmond magazine), Jun. 30; Lisa Provence, “Not gay: Marriage affirmation sparks protests”, The Hook (Charlottesville), Jul. 17; Adrian Brune, “ACLU to challenge Va. union ban”, Washington Blade, Jul. 16). The law is already being cited by some attorneys as reasons why persons in Virginia should be considered free to disregard not merely civil unions, but even court orders arising out of such unions, originating in other states. Attorneys for Lisa Miller-Jenkins, who recently moved to Virginia from Vermont after the breakup of a civil union in the latter state, are citing the Virginia law to justify their client’s reported refusal to comply with a two-month-old Vermont court order awarding her former partner, Janet Miller-Jenkins, rights to visit the daughter born to Lisa during their time together. “State law forbids Virginia courts from handling legal custody and parental rights disputes if proceedings are already under way in another state.” (Calvin R. Trice, “It’s Virginia vs. Vermont in custody case”, Richmond Times-Dispatch, Aug. 14; Justin Bergman, “Judge delays ruling on jurisdiction in lesbian custody battle”, Newport News Daily Press, Aug. 13; Jonathan Finer, “Custody Case Puts Lesbian Civil Union On Trial”, Washington Post/National Constitution Center, Aug. 7)(via Tim Hulsey). And some gay residents of the Dominion have reacted to the law by deciding to move away. Update Aug. 25: Va. judge takes jurisdiction of custody case notwithstanding court order (Washington Post). More background on case: Washington Blade, Aug. 20. Further updates Dec. 16 (I challenge conservative commentator David Frum’s description of the case); Aug. 26, 2006 (Vermont Supreme Court rules against Miller); Nov. 29, 2006 (Virginia appeals panel, reversing lower court, rules against Miller).
Update: Compaq beats glitch suit again
Following the spectacular $2 billion class action settlement in Beaumont, Texas against Toshiba for a reported data glitch in its laptop computers (see Nov. 3, 1999 and later coverage) class action lawyers descended with copycat suits against Compaq and other rival laptop makers. A federal class action was however rejected (see May 11-13, 2001) and now the Texas Supreme Court has rejected a national class action filed in Texas state courts. However, “attorneys for the class aren’t throwing in the towel and say a statewide class action still is possible”. Besides proffering other defenses, a lawyer for the company “contends that a buffer in Compaq’s computers prevents problems with the FDC [floppy disk controller].” (Mary Alice Robbins, “Court Boots Nationwide Class Action Against Compaq”, Texas Lawyer, May 18).
Opportunistic dad sent packing
According to what the court described as “overwhelming and credible evidence,” Derrick Williams refused to acknowledge that he was the father of Lisa Farmer’s unborn child, or have any contact with Farmer. Then he learned that she’d been awarded $150,000 after being in a car accident that claimed the life of the fetus. Then he decided that he really was a deeply devoted sort of dad after all and claimed half the money. Eventually the Mississippi Supreme Court told him to get lost. (“Mississippi gets it right” (editorial), Chicago Tribune, Aug. 10).
Client neglect: Fagan ordered to pay $3.4 million
Attorney Edward Fagan, much publicized for his role in Holocaust and other reparations controversies, “is facing a $3.2 million legal malpractice judgment for suing the wrong party in a personal injury case and failing to oppose its dismissal.” Former client Allen C. Tavel sued Fagan, saying he had neglected a product liability case against Honda Motor Corp. and the manufacturer of a seat belt that allegedly failed over an accident in which Tavel was seriously injured. “Fagan did not contest Tavel’s malpractice suit, which resulted in a default judgment. In May, Justice Shirley Kornreich of Manhattan Supreme Court awarded Tavel $1.2 million for his economic losses and $2 million for pain and suffering.” (Anthony Lin, “Personal Injury Client Wins Malpractice Award Against Holocaust Victims’ Lawyer”, New York Law Journal, Aug. 12). Fagan has been the subject of extensive coverage on this site, including Jun. 24-25, 2002; Apr. 2 of this year and links from there. More: Feb. 5, 2005.
DUI laws in the dark
The Washington Post profiles various local residents who saw their lives turned upside down, sometimes losing their marriage or livelihood, after being arrested under driving-under-the-influence laws which mandate automatic license suspension for first-time offenders. One woman had attended a birthday party after which she drove with a slightly elevated blood-alcohol level (0.09) which would not have constituted a legal offense at all until lawmakers ratcheted down permissible blood levels. (Lena H. Sun and Carol Morello, “For DUI, Personal Costs Are High”, Washington Post, Jul. 25). Soon the Post was fielding vehement letters to the editor accusing the paper’s reporters of excessive sympathy for these criminals. The TrueBeliever.org site, run by a California defense lawyer, has more, including a pointer to an organization called Responsibility in DUI Laws, Inc.. Radley Balko also offers a few opinions, with a big comments section, while KipEsquire dissents.
Judge: noise complaint merits no Creedence
According to Tim Sandefur (Aug. 6), musician John Fogerty, best known for his work with Creedence Clearwater Revival, in April of last year “prevailed in a lawsuit brought by an audience member who alleged that Fogerty?s music was so loud as to harm his hearing at the concert. …The opinion [by Judge Martin Schoenfeld], studded with quotations from Fogerty?s songs, held that
there is no standard of care by which a jury could determine on the evidence presented that defendants had breached a duty owed to plaintiff. Without knowing what is ?too loud,? and without knowing how loud the concert actually was, a jury would have to engage in double speculation to conclude that defendants? music was ?unreasonably loud.? Second, the doctrine of primary assumption of risk bars the instant action.
Finding no relevant cases in which concertgoers had been allowed to sue over excessive volume, the court also noted:
Surely this dramatic absence of litigation, in what is perceived to be such a litigious nation, speaks volumes to the fact that the principle applicable to the social compact governing the volume at Rock & Roll concerts is caveat emptor…. Litigation by an ?eggshell ear? plaintiff is not an appropriate means to impose an unlegislated noise code upon performers…and their legions of screaming fans….
The case cite (per Sandefur) is Powell v. Metropolitan Entertainment Co., Inc., 195 Misc.2d 847, 849 n. 1 (N.Y.Sup. 2003).
Radiology group expels member over testimony
“For the first time in its history, the American College of Radiology has expelled a member for giving inaccurate expert testimony. Dr. E. James Tourje, a neuroradiologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, was expelled [last month] for violating the ACR code of ethics, which states that expert testimony should be nonpartisan, scientifically correct, and clinically accurate.” Dr. Tourje had testified on behalf of the plaintiff in two malpractice cases, both of which resulted in defense verdicts. (“‘Expert’ witness gets booted from ACR”, Diagnostic Imaging Online, Jul. 8; Arati Murti, “Stat Read: Election-Year Politics Push Medical Liability Skirmishes to Trenches”, Imaging Economics, Aug.).
In a case several years ago, Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh Circuit gave impetus to the then-nascent trend toward professional self-regulation of expert testimony, writing in an opinion that “this kind of professional self-regulation furthers rather than impedes the cause of justice. More policing of expert testimony is required, not less.” (Russell M. Pelton, “Professing Professional Conduct: AANS Raises the Bar for Expert Testimony”, AANS Bulletin, Spring 2002. In the latest ABA Journal, Terry Carter discusses the controversy and in particular the formation of the Coalition and Center for Ethical Medical Testimony to promote efforts by associations to act against what Peter Huber has called malpractice by mouth. (“M.D. With a Mission”, ABA Journal, Aug., reprinted at CCEMT site)(PDF). The organized plaintiff’s bar is completely apoplectic about the trend: for its views, see Stephanie Mencimer, “The White Wall”, Legal Affairs, Mar-Apr.; Steve Ellman, “Code of Silence”, Miami Daily Business Review, Jun. 25, 2003.