Over at Point of Law, a new featured discussion has begun on the problem of state judicial selection, and what if anything to do about the problem of judicial campaigns funded (often very richly) by lawyers and litigants with interests before the courts in question. Discussing the topic are Alex Tabarrok of George Mason University, whose work (PDF, with Eric Helland) on the relation between judicial selection and tort awards has been widely talked about (he’s also a founder and principal of the excellent blog Marginal Revolution), and David Rottman, Principal Court Research Consultant the National Center for State Courts (more on panelists). It promises to be a highly illuminating week.
Discussion of judicial selection
Over at Point of Law, a new featured discussion has begun on the problem of state judicial selection, and what if anything to do about the problem of judicial campaigns funded (often very richly) by lawyers and litigants with interests before the courts in question. Discussing the topic are Alex Tabarrok of George Mason University, […]
Comments are closed.