Election watch: Shame on the Texas GOP

Possibly the Texas Republican Party has some legitimate arguments to offer against electing personal injury lawyer E. Ben Franks, a Democrat, to a state appeals judgeship in Texarkana. But if so, this sure isn’t one of them. (Mary Alice Robbins, “GOP Raises Religion in Court Race, Calling Democrat an Atheist”, Texas Lawyer, Oct. 9; Eugene […]

Possibly the Texas Republican Party has some legitimate arguments to offer against electing personal injury lawyer E. Ben Franks, a Democrat, to a state appeals judgeship in Texarkana. But if so, this sure isn’t one of them. (Mary Alice Robbins, “GOP Raises Religion in Court Race, Calling Democrat an Atheist”, Texas Lawyer, Oct. 9; Eugene Volokh, Oct. 10).

5 Comments

  • Nastygram from yours truly, a Republican atheist, headed their way.

  • Oh, I’m sure Mr. Franks has a religion.

  • Wise man say: A man with no god thinks he IS one.

  • Marty–is that any worse than a man with a god believing that what he wants is what god wants? It amounts to the same thing in the end.

  • Um, what exactly, is the problem, here?

    People have many preferences when it comes to whom they elect, and religion is, for many people, a factor. Simply calling it bad form to inform people doesn’t make it so.

    And I would say the same thing on the flip side, a complaint from a religious person running in a primarily atheist community.

    It’s relevant information; the voters deem it relevant.