It’s a bit of humor (via Stuttaford).
P.S. And a bit of medical humor too. Enjoy the July 4 holiday and see you on Thursday.
It’s a bit of humor (via Stuttaford).
P.S. And a bit of medical humor too. Enjoy the July 4 holiday and see you on Thursday.
Revising terminology with the goal of revising attitudes?
The word ‘accident’ is to be banned from the new edition of Britain’s Highway Code, which is published by the UK Department of Transport. Instead the words ‘collision’, ‘crash’ or ‘incident’ will be used to describe events that once were known as accidents.
This adoption of new terms for everyday events does not only have linguistic significance. The banning of the A-word is a consequence of a broader cultural outlook which insists that nothing happens accidentally these days and that there is always someone to blame. …
In June 2001, the prestigious British Medical Journal signed up to the crusade, explaining in an editorial why it had decided to ban the word accident from its pages. ‘[S]ince most injuries and precipitating events are predictable and preventable’, the word accident should not be used to refer to ‘injuries or the events that produce them’.
(Frank Furedi, “The crusade against the A-word”, Spiked-Online (U.K.), May 15)
At age 15 she began a year-long sexual relationship with her 22-year-old manager, which ended in breakup. Now she wants money from the restaurant for letting it happen. The criminal defense lawyer representing Hector Figueroa, the boyfriend/manager, says the complainant’s family knew about the consensual affair while it was going on. “She saw a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow and decided to pursue [a civil suit].” (Jordana Mishory, “Teen Sues McDonald’s Franchisee Over Sex With Boss”, Florida Daily Business Review, Jun. 21).
Thanks to Christian Schneider of the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute for tending the fires over the past week. Check in to the WPRI blog and Atomic Trousers to read more of his work. We’ll be welcoming more guestbloggers as the summer continues.
In the mail, but not played yet: So Sue Me, described as “the new board game where you enjoy the wackiness of today’s lawsuits”. The subtitle on the game box sounds straightforward enough: “Sue Your Friends. Take Their Stuff”.
A “slam dunk” story for the day after the NBA Draft:
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban isn’t shy about using multiple avenues to promote himself and his team. In what is likely an attempt to keep his name in the news, Cuban is suing Golden State Warriors head coach Don Nelson, who used to coach the Mavericks, for knowing the Mavericks personnel a little too well. This “inside” knowledge, claims Cuban, helped the eighth-seeded Warriors beat the #1 seed Mavericks in the first round of the NBA playoffs this year.
From the story:
Mavericks owner Mark Cuban believes Golden State’s sizzling shooting alone didn’t sink his basketball team in the most stunning playoff defeat in NBA history.
That’s according to Don Nelson’s attorney, John O’Connor, who said Cuban is suing Nelson, claiming the Warriors beat the Mavs in the first round because the Warriors’ coach — and former coach of the Mavs — had “confidential information and he [Cuban] wants to enjoin Don from coaching against the Mavericks.”…
According to the story, when Nelson left the Mavericks, he signed a “non-compete” agreement with Cuban, which Nelson claims ended when he took the job with Golden State. Cuban contends that this agreement is still in effect, which should prohibit Nelson from being able to coach another team.
I’ve often wondered how this actually affects sports teams – for instance, when a baseball player is traded mid-season to a competitor. Does it do his new team any good to have his inside knowledge of how the other team works? Isn’t it an advantage to know all the signals and shifts the other team can make, not to mention the personnel tendencies?
It’s still up in the air, however, which is a more embarrassing move for a franchise: Cuban’s lawsuit, or drafting a Chinese guy who may be lying about his age, refuses to work out against a human being, and has the Chinese government saying he will never play for your team. But I’m not bitter.
I smell class action:
Frequent N.H. Speeder Wants Limit Raised
DOVER, N.H. – A man with a penchant for speedy driving has come up with an unusual tactic for beating speeding tickets — raise the limit. So far this year, Larry Lemay has been ticketed four times for speeding.
Rather than slow down, Lemay is suing the state Department of Transportation to study traffic and speed limits across New Hampshire, to see whether limits could be raised. … Lemay said he believes many speed limits are set intentionally low so the state can cash in on drivers.
I’m not sure exactly what this lawsuit is meant to accomplish. So he wins, and a judge orders the state to do a “study” that it doesn’t want to do? Want three guesses as to what the study is going to say?
On the other hand, I might have to give him a call to see if I can file an amicus brief. I have a lot of parking tickets that I think violate my right to park on the sidewalk.
This site was mentioned on FoxNews.com when I was interviewed about the Starburst fruit-chew case earlier discussed by Christian Schneider.