I agree with the commentator on Eric’s blog who said that the “celebrity” means that it is the lawyer who is the celebrity, not necessarily her clients.
I agree with the commentator on Eric’s blog who said that the “celebrity” means that it is the lawyer who is the celebrity, not necessarily her clients.
Wouldn’t matter. A lawyer who thinks her biggest selling point — the very first thing you see on her website — is her “fame” is one to be avoided at all costs.
Clients should hire lawyers that have the needs of the client first and foremost, not the celebrity of the lawyer.
I once saw a man step between Gloria Allred and a camera. Poor bastard. They had to power-wash what was left of him off the concrete with a big hose. The video’s on rotten.com now.
3 Comments
I agree with the commentator on Eric’s blog who said that the “celebrity” means that it is the lawyer who is the celebrity, not necessarily her clients.
I agree with the commentator on Eric’s blog who said that the “celebrity” means that it is the lawyer who is the celebrity, not necessarily her clients.
Wouldn’t matter. A lawyer who thinks her biggest selling point — the very first thing you see on her website — is her “fame” is one to be avoided at all costs.
Clients should hire lawyers that have the needs of the client first and foremost, not the celebrity of the lawyer.
I once saw a man step between Gloria Allred and a camera. Poor bastard. They had to power-wash what was left of him off the concrete with a big hose. The video’s on rotten.com now.