- Lawyer blames “fine print” for overstepping solicitation rule on Buffalo air-crash victims [NJLJ, New Jersey Lawsuit Reform Watch]
- “Music Industry Takes Aim at Publishers of Online Lyrics” [ABA Journal]
- Prosecuting energy producers when their operations accidentally kill birds? Well, sometimes [WSJ Law Blog, Stossel, Adler at Volokh]
- Ninth Circuit rejects “litigation factory” approach to CAN-SPAM enforcement [California Civil Justice, Spam Notes]
- The semantics of saying “illegal” vs. “undocumented” alien [Volokh]
- “The crime of passing through town without an adequate explanation” [Freeland, Mississippi, on MotorhomeDiaries.com case]
- Report vague suspicion of child abuse, or not? Trust your instincts, says a public service ad. Bad advice [Free Range Kids, Common Room]
- “Plaintiff on Troll Tracker: ‘Let’s Get This [Blog] Shut Down'” [Mullin, IP Law & Business, earlier] More: SE Texas Record.
Filed under: bloggers and the law, chasing clients, child abuse, child protection, environment, Mississippi, Patent Troll Tracker
3 Comments
I’m sick and tired of people calling me a bank robber. It was merely an “undocumented withdrawl”.
Gosh, I’m just a lawyer trying to do my job. How can anyone expect me to obey the rules when there are so many of them?
Bob
Now that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were able to get those evil oil and power companies fined for killing migratory birds, will their next target will be the companies that supply wind energy, since the blades of the wind turbines kill a lot more birds than were killed by Exxon-Mobile? I suspect that they will look the other way.