- Insurance mandate or no, New Jersey specialists tending to duck out of high-legal-risk procedures like mammography [Amy Handlin, Gloucester County Times via NJLRA]
- Audi redux, or something different this time? L.A. Times endorses charges of sudden acceleration against Toyota [Holman Jenkins/WSJ, FindLaw “Injured“]
- Ghastly idea of the year: Rep. Waxman wants federal government to be “responsible” for fixing journalism [Coyote, Bainbridge]
- “Arkansas Judge Tosses Defamation Lawsuit Against Dixie Chicks Over ‘West Memphis Three’ Letter” [Citizen Media Law, Longstreth/American Lawyer]
- Judge Weinstein: falsification by arresting officers seems “widespread” in NYPD [Balko, Greenfield]
- U.K.: Carbon ration cards? [Krauthammer]
- Nova Scotia, Canada: “A Couple in their 70s Wave at A Kid…And In Swoop the Cops” [Free-Range Kids]
- Barbra Streisand loses suit over aerial photo of her Malibu home taken by environmental group; by suing, she ensures that many thousands more people will see the photograph, in what is dubbed “Streisand effect” [six years ago on Overlawyered]
Filed under: Arkansas, Canada, child protection, climate change, defensive medicine, libel slander and defamation, New Jersey, newspapers, police, Streisand effect, sudden acceleration
3 Comments
on the sudden acceleration issue. Haven’t people been taught to throw the transmission into neutral? Or use the horizontal pedal on the floor?
A+ roundup Walter & Ted. This is like an intellectual feast. I’m especially disturbed by the Canadian fascist exploits. Did those coppers have enough courtesy to say “papers, please?”
I can’t take any credit for this roundup, other than giving Walter the idea for daily bullet-pointed roundup posts a few years ago.