“English Heritage claims it owns every single image of Stonehenge, ever” [Cory Doctorow, BoingBoing, TechDirt]
Archive for 2010
New York chief judge rallies “Civil Gideon” campaign
But Ted Frank explains why creating a new entitlement to taxpayer-paid civil lawyers is a bad idea [New York Daily News, PoL]:
As any economist would tell you, if you lower the price of something, you get more demand for it. If it becomes completely costless to bring suit, we will see many more meritless suits.
That’s no small problem in New York, where courts are already overloaded.
If a dispute over shelter entitles a cantankerous tenant to a free attorney on the government’s dime, it will be much easier for people to fight evictions when they violate a lease in ways that threaten other tenants or intentionally refuse to pay rent. Landlords, in turn, will have to hire their own attorneys and raise rents and costs for their honest tenants.
Not unrelated: U.S. is granting asylum requests far more often than formerly. Why might that be? [Ted’s answer]
A story that can’t be true
We know it can’t, because Mayor Bloomberg has assured us that smoking bans don’t cut into restaurants’ business. [Saginaw News via Fountain; Vassar, Mich.]
Poppy seed bagels and false positive drug tests
If you thought such happenings were just an urban legend, the “Kafkaesque” experience of this Florida woman might make you think again. [John Pacenti, Daily Business Review via Radley Balko]
The Namby Pamby is exasperated
Best law firm sign?
Atlas carrying the law firm’s weight on his shoulders: a mobile photo from Steve Dillard of Georgia.
Title IX squashes high school soccer
The College Sports Council has recent reports from New York City, where both boys’ and girls’ squads have been sidelined following a New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) suit over fall vs. spring scheduling (related earlier here, here, and here), and Kentucky, where quotas have prevented formation of a boys’ team.
“Deposition Tricks: The Dirty Dozen”
Twelve ways lawyers try to gain (often unfair) advantage when interrogating captive opponents. [Maryland Bar Journal/SSRN via Legal Ethics Forum]
October 19 roundup
- Supreme Court case: “Family’s vaccine claim is not sustainable” [Washington Post editorial, earlier] More: John Calfee, The American.
- GAO: HHS acted in “unusual” way when it muzzled health plans on ObamaCare costs [Cannon/Cato-at-Liberty, earlier]
- “Trial Opens for Adoption Attorney Accused of Stealing From Clients” [NYLJ]
- U.K.: A “human right” to have someone prosecuted? [Greenfield]
- “Dodd-Frank, Bubble Laws, and Quack Corporate Governance” [Bainbridge]
- Child overprotection: “Pack away the cotton wool” [Sydney Morning Herald editorial, scroll]
- Here comes another SCOTUS case in the Twombly-Iqbal series? [WLF] Update: Apparently not [Ted at PoL] Why Iqbal and Twombly were rightly decided [Beck]
- Don’t link, criticize, use our name, refer to us, view our source code… [three years ago on Overlawyered]
Gerald Colbert v. Sonic Restaurants
As a connoisseur of hot-coffee cases, I’m always excited to see a court get one right. The Abnormal Use blog points us to Colbert v. Sonic Restaurants, No. 09-1423, 2010 WL 3769131 (W.D. La. Sept. 21, 2010). The plaintiff made the usual gamut of “design defect” and “failure to warn” claims, but the court wasn’t buying it. Note that the plaintiff claimed to be injured by the coffee at Sonic Restaurants, yet another refutation of the trial-lawyer claim that Stella Liebeck’s McDonald’s coffee was unusually hot.