• Did U.K. high official use pending Leveson press inquiry to browbeat newspaper? [Telegraph via Volokh]
• Canadian blogger sued over speech by Richard Warman has a legal defense fund [Blazing Cat Fur via Instapundit, 2010 Mark Steyn]
• “Introduction To Irony: Or, How To Take A Joke 10” [Wendy Kaminer, WBUR]
• Meat industry ex-employee sues blogger who led “pink slime” campaign [Popehat, Lunch Tray/Bettina Siegel]
• 1958 ordinance still on books in Ormond Beach, Fla. prohibits distribution of publications “belittling the traditional American institutions or folkways” [Volokh]
• “We have to concede” a rhesus monkey could not beat Mme. Taitz in court battle [Lowering the Bar]
• Common Cause vs. First-Amendment-protected political speech, part umpteen [Hans Bader, CEI]

Filed under: bloggers and the law, campaign regulation, free speech, free speech in Canada