• Yikes: Granby, Quebec, “moves to fine people insulting police on social media” [CBC]
• “Plaintiffs in foreign ‘hate speech’ lawsuit seeking to subpoena records from U.S. service providers” [Eugene Volokh] Visa for Dutch politician Geert Wilders aside, Reps. Keith Ellison and André Carson imply they’d like to limit speech for Americans too [same]
• “Why The D.C. Circuit’s Anti-SLAPP Ruling Is Important” [Popehat]
• Federal court strikes down Pennsylvania law allowing “re-victimization” suits for “renewed anguish” against convicts who speak about their crimes [Volokh, earlier]
• How different are judges? Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar marks an exception in Court’s preference for speech over regulation in campaign cases [SCOTUSBlog symposium, Elizabeth Price Foley/Instapundit, Daniel Fisher, Ilya Shapiro, our coverage of judicial elections]
• “New Jersey’s Sensitive Victim Bias Crime Unconstitutional” [Scott Greenfield]
• Amazing: Wisconsin John Doe prosecutor suggests criminally charging Gov. Scott Walker over remarks critical of probe [Journal-Sentinel, Volokh; more at Cato, Roger Pilon and Tim Lynch; earlier from me here, etc.]

Filed under: campaign regulation, hate speech, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, social media, subpoenas, Wisconsin