- “‘Game Of Thrones’ Fan Demands Trial By Combat” [Lowering the Bar]
- One way to lose your city job in NYC: “An administrative-law judge then agreed to his firing, noting [the deceased] didn’t show up at his hearing.” [New York Post]
- International Trade Commission asked to curb improper “imports,” i.e. transmissions, of data into the US, and yes, that could create quite a precedent [WSJ, R Street Institute, Niskanen Center, FreedomWorks letter] More: K. William Watson, Cato;
- Sixth Circuit panel explains in cement case why some towns (e.g. St. Marys) have no apostrophes, others do [St. Marys Cement v. EPA opinion via Institute for Justice “Short Circuit“]
- Proposed ban on export of some fine art from Germany stirs discontent [New York Times via Tyler Cowen]
- With its SEO budget already committed to “Oliver Wendell Holmes = doofus” keywords and the like, Volokh Conspiracy must rely on organic content to boost Brazilian apartment seeker clicks [David Kopel]
- But federal law forbids paying them, so the city won’t do that: “2 immigrants in U.S. illegally are named to Huntington Park commissions” [L.A. Times]
Filed under: art and artists, free trade, Germany, immigration law, Los Angeles, NYC
One Comment
RE proposed ban on exporting paintings from Germany that are more than 50 years old:
“‘There are plans to legally restrict the export of some paintings from Germany, and so far the proposed policy is not working out well. Collectors are rushing to take their loans off museum walls and get them out of the country, or hold them incognito.
The law would apply to works of historical importance more than fifty years old, worth more than 150,000 euros, and judged by regional boards to be of historic importance. It is interesting which works may fall under this designation:
In one interview, she [Germany’s culture minister] raised the prospect that foreign works could be classified as national treasures. For example, she said the Warhol silk-screens of Elvis Presley and Marlon Brando that were sold by the state-owned casino were ’emblematic’ of the collecting history of the Rhineland.”
Godwin’s law notwithstanding, it makes you wonder if the new film about the recovery of Klimt’s “Woman in Gold” painting had anything to do with this — Warhol isn’t a noted German artist, and The King and The Godfather aren’t known for contributions to Teutonic culture. Perhaps older paintings acquired in the early 1940s, are “emblematic of the collecting history of former WWI German aces.” So, is this a case of “We stole it fair and square back then, and you can’t have it back”?