- “Regulatory Crimes and the Mistake of Law Defense” [Paul Larkin, Heritage]
- Victims of sex offender registry laws, cont’d [Lenore Skenazy]
- James Forman, Jr.: case against mass incarceration can stand on its own without flawed Jim Crow analogy [Boston Review and N.Y.U. Law Review, 2011-12]
- “For-profit immigration jails, where the inmates — convicted of nothing — work for less than peanuts.” [@dangillmor on Los Angeles Times]
- “The New Science of Sentencing: Should prison sentences be based on crimes that haven’t been committed yet?” [Marshall Project on statistically derived risk assessments in sentencing]
- Group of 600 New England United Methodist churches issues resolution calling for an end to Drug War [Alex Tabarrok, who was also profiled the other day]
- Prison guard in Florida speaks up about witnessing abuse of inmate, and pays a price [disturbing content, Miami Herald]
Filed under: crime and punishment, Florida, illegal drugs, immigration law, prisoners, sex offender registries, whistleblowers
2 Comments
If you applied the logic of the sex-offender laws to the logical conclusion, the 14-year-old who lied about her age should receive an equal sentence. These one-sided laws are always harsher for male offenders than for women.
I’m sure when those Florida prison guards get to hell there will be high-fives all around. Just before the gates close.