…curb ADA bounty-hunting [Steven Greenhut, San Diego Union-Tribune, and thanks for mention]
Archive for 2015
Paris mayor: we’ll sue Fox News over “no-go” claims
State of the Union 2015
As I did last year I’m tweeting reactions to President Obama’s State of the Union address so you wouldn’t have to watch. Here are Twitter highlights, mostly in regular rather than reverse chronological order:
Joining the #CatoSOTU Twitter convo with @CatoInstitute scholars tonight? Here's a list of scholars live-tweeting: http://t.co/W3F0yoCS4E
— CatoEvents (@CatoEvents) January 20, 2015
I'm thinking I don't need to learn the details of Obama's new tax plan, since it's never going to pass. #RationalIgnorance #CatoSOTU
— Jason Kuznicki (@JasonKuznicki) January 20, 2015
Per rumor, Obama to unveil details of manager overtime mandate. Terrible idea (1/2) http://t.co/tRF2eovU5q http://t.co/jxcF7DjG8k #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 20, 2015
More on why manager overtime edict could be among Obama's worst legacies (2/2) http://t.co/PfwyWmWAzQ http://t.co/eEeBo0v1ux #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 20, 2015
MT @PGEddington Obama to push more regulation of cyber security, yet feds can’t even protect own bldgs http://t.co/Z4Z8tbM7uZ #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 21, 2015
To me, #SOTU's modern low point came in 2010 when Obama hectored #SCOTUS justices. You bet they remember http://t.co/syxtcCTmVh #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 21, 2015
What POTUS will say tonight: I plan to pay for free community college with tax hikes on college savings accounts #CatoSOTU
— Nicole Kaeding (@NKaeding) January 21, 2015
"Free from the grip of foreign oil" — yet so much of his own base has fought the drilling and pipelines that made that possible #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 21, 2015
"Will we allow ourselves to be sorted into factions and turned against one another…?" And then on to the let's-get-the-1% pitch #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 21, 2015
The SOTU is always a good time to remember that it’s a *very* limited set of *enumerated* powers the Constitution actually allows. #CatoSOTU
— Aaron Ross Powell (@ARossP) January 21, 2015
Politics creates factions. #CatoSOTU
— Trevor Burrus (@TCBurrus) January 21, 2015
At @overlawyered I just RT'd tweet re: Prez's lame "pay gap" talk. Didn't mention it was from last year's #SOTU — if that matters #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 21, 2015
So depressing to hear big applause for the oft-refuted demagogy on gender pay gap. Here's Cathy Young: http://t.co/QXESJKuAuU #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 29, 2014
“@MTannerCato: Yes, let's make it more expensive to hire workers. That will do wonders for low skill employment. #CatoSOTU” ????
— C.Conrad ?? (@CConrad78710) January 21, 2015
“When we react to the headlines instead of using our heads…” But I have 10 dubious proposals in response to the Sony hack. #CatoSOTU
— Julian Sanchez (@normative) January 21, 2015
Glad that President mentioned falling crime rate and is happy about falling incarceration rate. #CatoSOTU
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) January 21, 2015
More: Cato scholars respond in a video:
Holder’s order on forfeiture reform: less than meets the eye
By one estimate, “something like 86 percent of the loot that state and local law enforcement agencies receive through federal forfeitures will be unaffected by Holder’s new policy.” [Jacob Sullum, Reason; earlier] “Eric Holder’s Asset Forfeiture Decision Won’t Stop the Widespread Abuse of Police Power” [Jonathan Blanks, New Republic] “New Holder Policy Means Fewer Bal Harbours, More Motel Caswells” [Eapen Thampy, Americans for Forfeiture Reform] More: Balko, continued.
Texas caterer nailed for “citizenship discrimination”
Missed this one from the fall: a Texas catering business will pay a fine to the U.S. government for having engaged in “citizenship discrimination.” “Culinaire International unlawfully discriminated against employees based on their citizenship status, the Justice Department claimed, because it required non-citizen employees to provide extra proof of their right to work in the United States. Culinaire has agreed to pay the United States $20,460 in civil penalties, receive training in anti-discrimination rules of the Immigration and Nationality Act, revise its work eligibility verification process, and create a $40,000 back pay fund for ‘potential economic victims.'” Employers face stringent penalties if they ask for too few documents, but that doesn’t mean they’re free to ask for any more than the right number. [Rachel Stoltzfoos, Daily Caller; Bill Watson (“Trying too hard to follow bad laws? That’s illegal”)] Several related cases, from fifteen years ago, here.
Law professor who taught tax law convicted of tax evasion
But that’s not the end of the story. Law school fires her. She sues! But loses, at least so far. [Caron/TaxProf, ABA Journal; Hamline Law School, Minnesota]
January 20 roundup
- Grand jury said to recommend charges against Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane [Philadelphia Inquirer, more, earlier here and here]
- Orin Kerr analyzes Obama admininstration proposals to expand law on computer crime [Volokh Conspiracy and more]
- “Religious Liberty Isn’t a ‘Dog Whistle’ – It’s a Necessary Practice of a Free Society” [Scott Shackford, Reason vs. Frank Bruni, New York Times]
- Scalia, Epstein, many others: videos now online from the Federalist Society’s recently concluded 2014 National Lawyers Convention;
- List of firms with non-disparagement clauses (of highly dubious enforceability) purporting to forbid negative comments from customers [Tim Cushing, TechDirt]
- “Red Tape Is Strangling Good Samaritans” [Philip K. Howard, The Daily Beast]
- I’ve written on this irony: antitrust lawyers collude among themselves to boost their fee take [Daniel Fisher]
“On another occasion, [plaintiff] threatened to shoot his supervisor’s children in the kneecaps”
Great moments in unsuccessful ADA litigation: a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a summary judgment entered against a plaintiff who said his firing by the city of North Las Vegas constituted discrimination against him based on his hearing impairment as well as retaliation [Curley v. City of North Las Vegas]:
As part of the investigation, the Human Resources Department interviewed City employees and asked about their interactions with Curley. The interviews revealed that Curley had repeatedly threatened his coworkers and their families. For example, he threatened to put a bomb under a car, insinuated that he had mafia connections, and talked about giving a “blanket party” — which would involve throwing a blanket over a person’s head and beating him. One coworker reported that Curley threatened to kick his teeth out if the coworker did not join a union. On another occasion, Curley threatened to shoot his supervisor’s children in the kneecaps.
The interviews also revealed details about Curley’s work habits. Multiple coworkers said that Curley regularly conducted personal business while at work, sometimes spending up to three hours on his cell phone. It also appears that Curley was operating an ADA consulting business. Many of the calls he made during work were about the business, and coworkers saw him approach disabled individuals to discuss potential lawsuits.
Update thanks to reader Eric in comments:
I was thinking “He was only fired? Why isn’t he in jail?” so I googled him up. He has quite a history.
Astoundingly after he was fired from the city for his shenanigans, a school district (!) hired him as janitor. Six months later he was arrested for stalking (he kept threatening city employees). Finally (and after appearing in the papers) the school is attempting to fire him.
State of the Union
Tuesday evening, tune in to #CatoSOTU on Twitter for a libertarian take on the president’s State of the Union address with me and many others from Cato including David Boaz, Mark Calabria, Ilya Shapiro, Aaron Ross Powell, Nicole Kaeding, Jason Kuznicki, Julian Sanchez, Alex Nowrasteh, and more. Additional details here
Law enforcement for profit roundup
The “equitable sharing” civil forfeiture program (see weekend post) being just one of the more visible corners of a whole scaffolding of bad incentives in law enforcement:
- “Our view: Civil asset forfeiture is government at its absolute worst.” [USA Today editorial] Washington, D.C. votes forfeiture reform [Nick Sibilla, Institute for Justice] “Philadelphians Save Homes From Civil Forfeiture Machine” [IJ]
- “Police Chief Magazine: Generating Revenue Streams” [Instapundit]
- Public drunkenness outside the French Quarter said to serve New Orleans as key tourist tax [Paul Gowder, PrawfsBlawg]
- “The Debt Penalty: Exposing the Financial Barriers to Offender Reintegration” [Sentencing Law and Policy, Justice Fellowship back in August]
- To catch a non-predator (so as to grab his car through forfeiture) [Conor Friedersdorf on Florida police]
- “Prosecutors Burn Down the Law: How fire investigators distorted evidence to loot a company.” [WSJ editorial on Moonlight Fire case, earlier here and here]