- Today at Cato, Josh Blackman discusses his new book Unraveled: Obamacare, Religious Liberty, and Executive Power with comments from Washington Post Supreme Court reporter Robert Barnes and Philip Klein of the Washington Examiner, Ilya Shapiro moderating [watch live 12 noon Eastern]
- Breed-specific laws fuel mass euthanasia: “Montreal Gearing Up To Sentence Huge Numbers Of Innocent Dogs To Death” [Huffington Post]
- Feds prepare to mandate mechanical speed governors capping road speed of tractor-trailers; truckers warn of crashes and traffic jams [AP/San Luis Obispo Tribune]
- “You have to go back to the Red Scare to find something similar,” said Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas) of advocacy-group subpoenas by Hill committee in “Exxon Knew” probe. Or just five months to the CEI subpoena [Washington Post hearing coverage which oddly omits mention of CEI episode]
- “I’m not here to take away your guns.” Why Hillary Clinton’s assurances ring hollow [Jacob Sullum] Trump’s comments defending stop-and-frisk and no-fly no-buy further undercut his never-impressive claims as defender of gun liberty [AllahPundit, Leon Wolf, Ilya Somin]
- Why my Cato colleagues believe the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership (TPP) is worth supporting as a trade liberalization measure despite some suboptimal aspects [Daniel J. Ikenson, Simon Lester, Scott Lincicome, Daniel R. Pearson, K. William Watson, Cato Trade]
Filed under: animals, autos, Canada, Cato Institute, climate deniers to the wall, Donald Trump, free trade, guns, Hillary Clinton, ObamaCare, religious liberty
2 Comments
I object to the use of the term “euthanasia” in the item about the killing of dogs of allegedly dangerous breeds. The term is properly used in contexts where death is considered to be for the benefit of the one who dies, for example, when a dog is severely injured. That is not the case here. These dogs will be killed simply because they are considered undesirable.
Your CATO colleagues have apparently decided that reform of our corrupt and dysfunctional copyright and software-patent law is a lost cause, so they are willing to let TPP slide through. I see it as bad enough to justify stopping TPP. Then it would be time to negotiate an “open covenant, openly arrived at.”