- “Syracuse woman sued for not letting adopted cat sleep in bed with her” [CNYCentral]
- St. Louis talc cases: “Thus, in order to vindicate their Due Process rights regarding personal jurisdiction…, the defendants had to litigate with over $5 billion in potential liability hanging over their heads. Not too many defendants [can] do that.” [Jim Beck on Johnson & Johnson win]
- Allegation: “instructed Thomas to get behind the wheel of Thomas’ Avalanche to make it appear that Thomas was driving the vehicle at the time of the staged accident.” [WDSU on indictment of five in New Orleans car-crash scheme] “Those cameras right there saved between $150,000 and $200,000 just by capturing the fraud and us not having to go and defend it.” [Mike Perlstein, WWL] “Don’t listen to the lawyers, take tough action to curb [Louisiana] car insurance costs” [R.J. Lehmann and Marc Hyden, The Advocate; earlier here, here, and here]
- Washington Legal Foundation monograph on judicial oversight of expert testimony [Evan Tager et al.; related webinar] “Stupid expert tricks,” pharmaceutical edition [Jim Beck]
- “Art Imitates Life: ‘Billions’ Describes Six-Figure, Part-Time Jobs On Asbestos Trusts” [Daniel Fisher, Legal Newsline, 2018]
- “DOJ eyes requirement that False Claims Act whistleblowers disclose litigation funding” [Alison Frankel, Reuters, remarks by Deputy Associate Attorney General Stephen Cox]
Filed under: animals, asbestos, claims fraud, expert witnesses, problem jurisdictions, qui tam, whistleblowers
4 Comments
The punishment for fraudulent litigation should be very severe. At the end of the day, when a fraudulent case is filed, the plaintiff is attempting to arm himself or herself with the power of the state to take money. It is a serious crime. And it should be punished seriously.
The same goes for government attorneys that violate ethics rules . .. .
Syracuse cat adoption–
I can envision a moot court farce about a boyfriend who self-identifies as a cat…
On a slightly more serious note, overcontrolling pet adoption agencies have been around for a while:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/01/09/brief-frolic-outside-may-cost-woman-her-cat/Txs0L8dLqOJ1FbvLC172YP/story.html
It may be part of a general decline of our ownership culture, especially with software products that stop working at the vendor’s whim.
Waiting for the first lawsuit to be filed over the corona virus in 3….2…..1…..
The first word that you teach a new cat in your house is the word “No”. It is used for all sorts of situations, from the mundane to the extremely dangerous (walking onto a stovetop). It gets the cat used to the concept of limits, so that it is able to deal with those limits when they should arise. Best done when the cat is still a kitten – we recently acquired two Maine Coon kittens and this was the first thing that they learned about us.
The cats will eventually decide to humor you and “accept” your limits, more-or-less. They will still whine when you do not obey “them”.
Note: also applicable to children. And maybe also some cat owners.