- More boxes get banned: Connecticut measure will ban asking age on job applications [Daniel Schwartz]
- In closely divided en banc ruling, Ninth Circuit rules it cruel and unusual punishment for prison authorities to deny inmate sex-reassignment surgery [en banc opinion and panel decision; Josh Blackman on a dissent authored by Judge Patrick Bumatay; I was quoted last year in public radio coverage of the Adree Edmo case]
- “Fear And Loathing At The Department Of Labor: Has The OFCCP Become A Law Unto Itself?” [Cory Andrews, WLF, more]
- “Look for the Union Label, not the Gender Role” [Sarah Skwire]
- Freedom means freedom for everyone: joined by Prof. Eugene Volokh, Cato files First Amendment amicus brief on behalf of Colorado graphic/web designer who objects to working on same-sex weddings [Ilya Shapiro and James Knight on 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, Tenth Circuit]
- CBS News misrepresents the state of pregnancy-accommodation law in the workplace [Jon Hyman]
Filed under: age discrimination, government contract compliance, labor unions, pregnancy discrimination, prisoners, sex discrimination, transgender
2 Comments
The Eighth Amendment and “recommended by a doctor” are not co-extensive.
This is one of those decisions that should simply get defied. The government should just say no. And that’s that. Ultimately, defiance is the answer for these ridiculous rulings.
Re banning the age box:
“Please list all educational institutions attended, primary, secondary, and post-secondary, and the years in which you attended them.”