In 1999, Maria Storm had a mole on her right shoulder that was rubbing against her bra strap; Dr. Patrick Zimmerman removed it at her request. The mole did not have an irregular shape or color. Four years later, she was diagnosed with a fatal melanoma on a different part of her body (“Louis Dehner, M.D., a pathologist at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, testified that the mole Zimmermann removed was not the primary spot of the melanoma”), and her family sought to blame her death on Zimmerman, seeking $10.9 million. (Zimmerman biopsies 30% of the moles he sees, and less than 1% of the ones he orders for testing are malignant, suggesting he’s already practicing heavily defensively.) A Madison County jury rejected attorney Rex Carr’s pleas; Carr (Feb. 6; Dec. 6, 2005; Nov. 6, 2005; Dec. 23, 2004; May 4, 2004; POL Dec. 28, 2004) says he’ll appeal. (Steve Horrell, “No award in med-mal case”, Edwardsville Intelligencer, Jan. 31; Leah Thorsen, “Doctor sued over cancer death defends his prognosis of mole”, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Jan. 30; Steve Gonzalez, “Collinsville physician cleared in Madison County med mal trial”, Madison County Record, Jan. 31).
Client intake dressed up as consumer info, cont’d
While on the subject of consumer information websites that funnel readers to lawyers, reader R.F. nominated 4mychild.com, a website about cerebral palsy whose site is bannered “Organizations for Special Needs Children”. Scroll down to the bottom of the opening page to find the attorney-advertising disclaimer.
Common Cause, Colorado, and unintended consequences
“Voters last November approved Amendment 41, which limited gifts to most government employees and their families to $50. The constitutional amendment was put on the ballot by wealthy entrepreneur Jared Polis and the public-interest group Common Cause.” It soon emerged that the measure might prohibit the award of university scholarships to children of government employees or the award of the Nobel Prize to a government-employed scientist. Highly placed Coloradans have been scurrying about for weeks now trying to figure out what to do. (Lynn Bartels and Alan Gathright, “Pressure to fix ethics law”, Rocky Mountain News, Feb. 6; Lynn Bartels, “GOP’s May says Polis ‘threatening’ in Amendment 41 talk”, Rocky Mountain News, Feb. 9; Chris Frates and Jeri Clausing, “Fix it yourself, backers of 41 told”, Denver Post, Jan. 31; Mark Hillman (former Colo. state treasurer), “Ethics amendment creates an ethical dilemma”, Independence Institute, Jan. 25; text of Amendment 41 (PDF); Peter Blake (columnist), Rocky Mountain News, Nov. 15, Dec. 20, Jan. 3, and Jan. 20).
A “fixture” in Gotham courthouses
Michael Melnitzky, whose wife filed for divorce in 1994, “has sued virtually everyone involved: one of his former lawyers, his wife’s lawyer, three banks, five judges and a psychiatrist appointed by the court to evaluate his mental health. In unrelated cases, he has sued a neighbor, a thrift shop, the city and his former employer. And he has almost always lost.” “I used to be an art restorer,“ says Melnitzky, a pro se litigant. “Now I’m a litigator. If you’re going to attack me or assault me on a legal front, and I don’t hit back, I would feel dishonorable with myself.” (Ray Rivera, “The Marriage Lasted 10 Years. The Lawsuits? 13 Years, and Counting”, New York Times, Feb. 19; Above the Law, Feb. 20).
Lerach Coughlin partner faces D.C. ethics charges
G. Paul Howes, who’s handled Lerach’s high-profile litigation over losses arising from the Enron collapse, faces serious ethics charges over actions he took during his earlier career as a federal prosecutor. “On Feb. 1, the D.C. Bar Counsel filed eight charges against Howes after a four-year investigation, accusing him of violating bar ethics rules by committing criminal acts, making false statements in court, offering prohibited payments to witnesses, and interfering with the administration of justice.” Ethics proceedings against federal prosecutors are rare; disbarment is among the possible sanctions that could be asked. It doesn’t appear Howes is going to win any popularity contests among his former law enforcement colleagues:
Amy Jeffress, deputy chief of the office’s Organized Crime and Narcotics Trafficking Section[,] referred to Howes — though not by name — during a Jan. 31 debate on the power of prosecutors at American University, Washington College of Law.
“He actually left the office and moved all the way across the country to San Diego to escape his shame and his bad reputation,” Jeffress said, according to a recording of the debate. “He basically became a pariah in our office. His name is a synonym around our office for no-no. You don’t want to do what he did.”
(Brendan Smith, “Former Prosecutor Charged With Misconduct in Gang Cases”, Legal Times, Feb. 15).
Disposition of Anna Nicole Smith remains
ConsumerAffairs.com
Billing itself as a “non-partisan, independent information provider”, it invites you to submit your complaint about an unsatisfactory consumer transaction on its automated complaint form. The complaint form notes that reports “become the property of ConsumerAffairs.Com Inc.” and you must include your contact information. If you keep reading down, you may notice that “We work with attorneys with specific expertise in many areas of consumer law. It is sometimes necessary for them to contact you in order to determine whether there is a legal remedy for your complaint. There is no charge for any such consultation.” (Fred Lucas, “‘Consumer Watchdog’ Website Faces Complaints, Lawsuits”, CNSNews.com, Feb. 12; Childs, Feb. 16).
Charlie Weis mistrial
Charlie Weis, Notre Dame football head and former New England Patriots assistant coach, has been the plaintiff in a Massachusetts medical malpractice case where he seeks a windfall because his gastric bypass surgery, like many gastric surgery bypasses, had complications that he has recovered from. Unfortunately, a juror collapsed during proceedings, and the defendant doctors rushed over to help her before the other jurors could be removed from the courtroom, and this concern for the health of another human being means that the doctors, whose schedules have already been disrupted by the lengthy trial, will have to go through it all over again, as Weis successfully moved for a mistrial. [AP/SI-CNN via Quizlaw]
February 22 roundup
- Update to Jan. 5 post: “Gifties” lose t-shirt battle. Amber Taylor is not impressed by Posner’s opinion, though. [Above the Law; Taylor]
- Update to our earlier odometer class action; turns out SAE gives odometers a 4% leeway, so Honda is paying millions for following industry standard. Nissan is still fighting the suit, and other manufacturers will likely be hit. [Gannett/Asbury Park Press]
- $12M for suicide despite hospital workers putting themselves in danger in unsuccessful attempt to prevent death [Birmingham News]
- Electric slide inventor sues YouTubers who perform dance wrong. [CNet (h/t LN)]
- Now the NFL wants to trademark “The Big Game.” [Schwimmer; earlier on Overlawyered]
- NAM blog on punitive damages, likes what I have to say. [NAM blog]
- “Kiss life sciences goodbye if lawsuit bills are passed.” [Detroit News via NAM blog; Manhattan Institute]
- “When Flirting at Work Is Flirting With Trouble” [New York Times]
- AG Lockyer’s office hid millions of dollars of giveaways to trial lawyer donors. [Point of Law roundup of links]
- Maybe it’s time to stop calling myself a fifth-string talking head and recognize that I’m a fourth-string talking head. [Financial Times; Forbes.com; Madison County Record]
Wilkes & McHugh sued over alleged Tenn. fee grab
Tampa-based Wilkes & McHugh, which has enjoyed much success filing suits against nursing homes in many states, “is now on the defense end of a suit that contends the firm knowingly violated Tennessee law regarding contingency fees.” Former client Debbie Howard, who hired the firm to sue a Memphis nursing home, says it “engaged in an unlawful scheme to collect 40 percent or 45 percent in contingency fees of settlement amounts, although Tennessee law caps fees to 33 and 1/3 percent in medical malpractice cases. The complaint says the law firm charged the higher and unlawful contingency fee to hundreds of clients in Tennessee.” In its response, the law firm says the complaint is “scurrilous” and based on falsehoods, and says Howard never appealed a Tennessee court order approving the fees. (Liz Freeman, “Tampa law firm faces contingency fees lawsuit”, Naples (Fla.) News, Jan. 14; Scott Barancik, “Firm gets a taste of dish it serves”, St. Petersburg Times, Feb. 17). For more on the law firm, see Mar. 13-14, 2001, Jul. 6, 2005, and Jun. 22, 2006, as well as Scott Barancik, “Law firm’s success against nursing homes has a price”, St. Petersburg Times, Jul. 24, 2004.