Overlawyered: Chronicling The High Cost Of Our Legal System

November 7 roundup

  • My informal debate with Professor Silver over the effect of reform on physician supply continues. [Point of Law; Silver]
  • If you’ve been intrigued by Professor E. Volokh’s idea of medical self-defense (and thus payment for organs) as a constitutional right, he’ll be discussing it with Richard Epstein and Jeffrey Rosen at AEI. [Volokh; Harvard Law Review @ SSRN; AEI]
  • Peter Wallison on how over-regulation and over-litigation is killing American competitiveness in the capital markets. [Wall Street Journal @ AEI]
  • Press coverage is finally starting to break through in the Milberg Weiss scandal with a lengthy Fortune profile. [Point of Law]
  • Economists and scholars file Supreme Court amicus brief calling for federal preemption of state “anti-predatory lending laws” in important Watters v. Wachovia case. [Zywicki @ Volokh; CEI]
  • One-sided coverage by the New York Times on the issue of web accessibility for the blind. Earlier: Oct. 27; Feb. 8. [New York Times]
  • Deep Pocket Files update: MADD tries to intervene in stadium vendor case where appellate court tossed $105 million verdict because of unfair trial. See Aug. 4 and links therein. [New Jersey Law Journal]
  • Lawsuit: my dead father’s baseball card mischaracterizes his nickname. [Lattman]
  • Lawsuit: I have legal right to the letter W. [Times Record News via Bashman]
  • Samuel Abady and Harvey Silverglate on libel tourism. [Boston Globe via Bashman]
  • Another roundup of Justice Robert Thomas libel lawsuit stories. [Bashman]
  • $15M Minnesota verdict blaming a delayed delivery for cerebral palsy, despite evidence it was caused by an unrelated infection. [Pioneer Press]

Filed under: , , , , , , , , ,

No on state marriage amendments

“The irony in Virginia is that conservatives fearful of an out-of-control judiciary are in fact inviting the judiciary to get involved in micro-managing family law.” (David Boaz, “Marriage measure is an amendment too far”, Examiner.com, Oct. 30). For more of the many, many reasons to vote no, see Sept. 20, 2006, May 31 and Nov. 2, 2004, etc., etc.

Update: David Frum gloats — and quite prematurely, it would seem.

Filed under: ,

Nifong faces Durham voters

Can prosecutors be made to pay a price at the ballot box for malfeasance? Durham, North Carolina, county district attorney Mike Nifong is up for re-election, and has run well in polls despite his hounding of three Duke lacrosse players — perhaps the year’s banner case of abusive prosecution (see Oct. 11, Oct. 12, Oct. 30, etc.). One challenger, County Commissioner Lewis Cheek, “has said he won’t serve if elected, instead allowing Gov. Mike Easley to appoint a new prosecutor”; a third candidate, Steve Monks, has been waging a write-in campaign. (Ray Gronberg, “Durham DA race is hot”, Durham Herald-Sun, Nov. 6; Ruth Sheehan, “Turning the tide in Durham”, Raleigh News & Observer, Oct. 30). For some recent developments in the case, incidentally, see here, here and here (witnesses say accuser soon after incident performed dances inconsistent with alleged injuries), here (Nifong never interviewed accuser), and here (“Go ahead, put marks on me”). Update: and yet more doubt cast here (Nov. 11).

Filed under: , ,

Not your usual AG candidate

Former California Gov. Jerry Brown is overwhelmingly favored to become the state’s next attorney general, but don’t assume he’ll necessarily follow in the footsteps of Bill Lockyer:

“I’m going to take a very practical, common-sense approach as attorney general,” Brown said in a recent interview. “I’m someone who’s acutely aware of the fact that we as a state have added 25,000 laws since I was governor. I think we ought to give people some space to live their lives.” …

And don’t assume that he will agree completely with Lockyer’s decisions. Asked about the global-warming lawsuit, Brown said he’d have to “take a good look at it.”

“I think there’s an issue of causation there,” he said, adding that California needs to consider automakers’ “imploding” financial situation. …

“He was the first politician to turn litigation into a press release [as California Secretary of State, elected in 1970],” said Hiestand, the former Brown aide [Fred Hiestand, now prominent in California litigation-reform circles].

In post-Watergate 1974, the reform-minded Brown was swept into the governor’s office. One year later, Brown and the Legislature were besieged with pleas from doctors facing skyrocketing malpractice insurance costs. Brown called a special session that would eventually lead to the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, or MICRA, California’s law capping pain and suffering awards at $250,000.

Hiestand remembers philosophical discussions with Brown on the best ways to compensate malpractice victims. After graduating from Yale Law School in 1964, Brown clerked for state Supreme Court Justice Mathew Tobriner, a contemporary of tort expert and future chief justice Roger Traynor. Brown, Hiestand said, recalled Traynor’s critical dissent in a 1962 case where a woman injured on a bus was awarded $134,000 for non-economic damages. Traynor said such awards were troubling because they are tied to subjective amounts of pain and suffering.

“At one point Jerry looks at me and says, ‘Money is a false god. If you’re in pain, you should turn to religion, sex or drugs,'” Hiestand said.

(Cheryl Miller, “Former Calif. Gov. Jerry Brown Runs for State Attorney General”, The Recorder/Law.com, Oct. 16)(cross-posted from Point of Law’s Featured Discussion on the election, which is still going great guns).

Filed under: , , , ,

UK: Publishing grifter’s photo = violating her human rights?

Jewelers in Kensington, West London, have been repeatedly victimized by a conwoman who poses as a wealthy shopper from Dubai and scoops up thousands in merchandise when novice clerks are distracted. The latest victim of the scam, jewelry designer Isabel Kurtenbach, says she asked police about posting a store-cam photo of the thief to warn other shops, and was told not to because it would be a violation of the perpetrator’s human rights. (Evening Standard, Oct. 26; Daily Telegraph, Oct. 27)(via Zincavage). Subsequently, the Lord Chancellor said the police’s advice had been “plainly wrong” and that storekeepers had every right to post such photos. (Guardian, Oct. 30).

Filed under: ,

Lowbrow liquor labels

Paternalism watch: Seattle has banned, in certain areas of the city, the sale of “29 brands of cheap booze favored by the homeless,” including Thunderbird, Richard’s Wild Irish Rose and Night Train Express. “But on the streets of downtown and Capitol Hill, people who acknowledged they were homeless and drunk seemed to find ways to make do.” (Kery Murakami, “Alcoholics finding way around ban”, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Nov. 2)(via Balko, Reason “Hit and Run”).

Filed under: ,

November 6 roundup

  • Election day is tomorrow; the roundtable is still going on our sister website. [Point of Law]
  • One reason the election is important: judicial nominations. Bill Clinton appointed 378 judges; Bush, in six years, 266, with 45 vacancies. [National Law Journal]
  • Update: Illinois appellate court rejects Judge Maag’s $110M libel suit. (Earlier: Dec. 23, 2004 and links therein.) [Bashman]
  • Does Professor Charles Silver’s single-variable time series on Texas doctor supply tell us anything about reform, as he claims? Did doctors push reform down the throats of an “anonymous and dispersed” group? I argue no. [Point of Law; Silver @ Bizarro-Overlawyered]
  • Professor Paul Horwitz questions the convenience of the death-bed statements of the decedent in Williams v. Philip Morris. [PrawfsBlawg]
  • More threatened Borat-related litigation (Nov. 29) from Mahir “I kiss you” Cagri and from Gypsies. The latter is resulting in film censorship in Germany. [Wired; Sydney Morning Herald]
  • “We live in a very litigious society; it makes it more difficult for a physician to be a good Samaritan.” [MetroWest Daily News via Kevin MD]
  • Add Art Bell to the list of people threatening to sue bloggers. [Workbench]
  • Twenty years of Scalia. [Weekly Standard]

Filed under: , , , ,

Better not cross this developer

We would never call him litigious or anything, but Morton A. Bender seems to have quite a reputation around Washington, D.C. and environs:

Bender, a 73-year-old native Washingtonian who made a fortune in the family construction business, is one of the most determined men in town, both admirers and detractors say. This is not a man who likes to negotiate. He enjoys a good fight.

The local and federal courts hold stacks of cases in which he is sometimes the defendant but more often the plaintiff. He says he can’t keep track of all the people and institutions he’s currently suing and doesn’t know how many lawyers he’s hired. “I saw the mayor at an event, and he said, ‘How many cases do you have against the District?’ and I said ‘a few,’ ” Bender said….

“I stand up to be counted,” Bender is fond of saying. “No one stands up for rights anymore.”…

Early discussions between Bender and the neighbors about his plans went nowhere. He ended up suing one neighbor over a retaining wall that encroached 15 inches onto his new property. He won in D.C. Superior Court but not before the judge questioned why Bender brought the case.

“It seems to be the height of folly, laced with a bit of vindictiveness the source of which is unknown to the court, for plaintiff to insist that this attractive and necessary wall be removed simply so that it can be reconstructed about two feet further down the hill,” Judge Geoffrey M. Alprin wrote.

(Lyndsey Layton, “In D.C., It’s Big Names Vs. a Litigious Developer”, Washington Post, Oct. 30).