A series of tweets I did about Thursday’s major announcement on Title IX policy from Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos:
With @BetsyDeVosED today unveiling plans to revamp Obama rules on sexual assault and college discipline, here's a long tweetstorm… /1
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
…which I'll base on highlights from @EmilyYoffe's terrific article in @TheAtlantic, just out, on this subject https://t.co/kfIgIFFlzx /2
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
I went on to explain that it all starts with the Department of Education’s OCR (Office for Civil Rights) 2011 Dear Colleague letter, and the further guidance that followed, which I wrote up here.
Most famously it ordered colleges to adopt "preponderance of evidence" not "clear and convincing" in guilt-finding. But much more too… /5
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
Obama admin came to push “single investigator” model, whereby school names one person "to act as detective, prosecutor, judge, and jury." /7
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
Setting a tone, "many subsequent federal documents described complainants as victims or survivors, and the accused as perpetrators." /9
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
OCR put 100s of colleges on investigation list, and its field agents were seen as bent on scoring penalties, not neutral fact-finders /10
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
"Increasingly the momentum of their own bureaucracies" as well as feds, activists, fear of criticism push schools into extreme positions /12
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
Tipsy? Lacking in voiced consent? Conduct banned in some college codes “plausibly covers almost all sex students are having today.” /13
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
That’s a quote by Yoffe from a California Law Review article by Jacob Gersen and Jeannie Suk Gersen previously noted in this space here and here.
Interim measures may include steps to ensure that accuser never has to encounter accused, thus banishing from ordinary dorm life, clubs /15
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
Perhaps the most amazing single paragraph in Yoffe's piece, worth reading and mulling before you join any movement to #StopBetsy /17 pic.twitter.com/UeSNkFahcK
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
No wonder groups of lawprofs at Harvard and Penn have written open letters to say OCR "has undermined due process and justice." /18
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
The courageous Harvard Law professors who called for a rethink of the Obama-era policy — Janet Halley, Elizabeth Bartholet, Jeannie Suk Gersen and Nancy Gertner — were profiled in a recent issue of The Crimson and in earlier coverage in this space here and here.
Paradoxically, among activists and increasingly admins, view is "women who deny they were assaulted should not necessarily be believed." /20
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
At Yale, "more than 30 percent of all undergrad-assault allegations" were third-party reports where putative victim refused to cooperate /22
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
Though colleges have begun losing lawsuits to male students, their own Title IX bureaucracies press them to dig in to defend new methods /24
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
"They should also model for their students how an open society functions, & how nec'y it is to protect the civil liberties of everyone" /26
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
Whole @EmilyYoffe piece here, which (in case it wasn't obvious!) I recommend highly: https://t.co/kfIgIFFlzx /27, end #INeedTitleIX #INeedIX
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) September 8, 2017
More coverage of DeVos’s speech and initiative, in which she pledged to use appropriate notice-and-comment methods rather than Dear Colleague guidance to introduce changes (“The era of ‘rule by letter’ is over”): Christina Hoff Sommers/Chronicle of Higher Education, Benjamin Wermund/Politico, Jeannie Suk Gersen/New Yorker, KC Johnson and Stuart Taylor, Jr./WSJ and cases going against universities, Johnson/City Journal, Bret Stephens/NYT (“no campus administrator was going to risk his federal funds for the sake of holding dear the innocence of students accused of rape”), Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Hans Bader/CEI, Scott Greenfield and more (no basis in law to begin with), Robby Soave/Reason and more.