Posts Tagged ‘Denver’

“$16.3 million in lawyer fees OK”

Waving big fees through the gate:

A Denver District Court judge overseeing a $50 million class-action settlement from Qwest Communications shot down a shareholder group’s request to limit plaintiff attorney fees to $10 million.

Judge John Coughlin gave short shrift to arguments presented by the Association of U S West Retirees, which asked the court — at the very least — to delay settlement approval until attorneys submitted detailed documentation of their hours and expenses.

At a fairness hearing [Aug. 30], the judge ruled the class counsel, led by Los Angeles law firm Lerach Coughlin, was entitled to $15 million, or 30 percent of the settlement, plus an additional $1.3 million in out-of-pocket expenses….

[The retiree association] wanted proof of each firm’s time records and questioned several six-figure expenses, including $176,000 for meals, hotel and travel and $105,000 for photocopying.

“That’s 25 cents a page using your own office copy machine,” Denver attorney Curtis Kennedy, representing the retirees, said Tuesday after the hearing. “Don’t we at least get a discount for volume? Why not 5 cents a page?”

…[L]ast month, the association filed its objections over attorney fees, complaining that the more than $16.3 million Lerach had requested would leave just $33 million to be distributed among the thousands of plaintiff shareholders they represented….

[Kennedy] said the blanket $15 million contingency award represented 2.3 times what the plaintiff lawyers actually put into the case. Paralegal time alone would be compensated at the rate of more than $400 an hour.

“Times are changing,” he told the judge. “Shareholders are beginning to feel they need to step up and object…that these attorney fees are getting out of hand.”

How often will they feel it worth objecting if, as here, they get the back of the judge’s hand for their troubles? (John Accola, Rocky Mountain News, Aug. 31).

They mixed those children up/And not a creature knew it

At North Suburban Medical Center outside Denver, nurses mistakenly gave the wrong newborn to a mother to breast feed. The mistake was discovered after a few minutes, the infant having declined the proffered refreshment, but the woman’s family is now suing and the other family is considering suing too. (“Mom Sues Hospital Claiming She Nursed Wrong Baby”, KMGH-TV, Mar. 16)(title allusion).

Sued for leaving cookies on porch

Colorado: “Two Durango teens thought they’d surprise neighbors with nighttime deliveries of home-baked treats. But one woman was so terrified, she sued and has won.” But Wanita Renea Young, 49, was so unnerved by the knocks at her door at 10:30 p.m. that she called sheriffs and then sought emergency room care for an anxiety attack. The teenage cookie-leavers, Taylor Ostergaard and Lindsey Jo Zellitti, wrote her letters of apology, but she sued anyway and won $900. (Electa Draper, “Cookie klatch lands girls in court”, Denver Post, Feb. 4). More: National Review Online notes the case and radio host Steve Gill tells how to send the girls money. A day or two later: public support and media appearances roll in for the cookie girls (Denver Post, Feb. 6; more). And David Giacalone enters a dissent.

A university athlete’s heirs

But the lion took the biggest share:

Relatives of an Oklahoma State basketball player killed in a university plane crash in 2001 were awarded a $1.6 million settlement, a newspaper [The Oklahoman] reported Monday….

Lawson, a 21-year-old junior guard, was one of 10 men who died Jan. 27, 2001, when an airplane carrying members of the basketball program crashed in a Colorado field on the way back from a basketball game at the University of Colorado….

Lawson’s son, Ramses B. Hereford, received $440,139, his parents, Daniel Lawson Sr. and Phyllis Lawson, each received $223,238 and the remaining money — nearly $730,000 — was awarded to attorneys for legal fees and costs, according to court records.

Contributing to the settlement are North Bay Charter, the owner of the downed airplane; the estate of the late pilot, Denver Mills; Marathon Power Technologies, a maker of airplane parts; and Oklahoma State University. Wichita-based Raytheon Aircraft did not settle, and a lawsuit continues seeking to saddle it with the blame for the crash. (“Legal wrangling not finished”, AP/ESPN, Dec. 19).

Accuser: I’ll forum-shop till Kobe drops

Kobe Bryant’s accuser filed rape charges against him in Colorado, where the incident took place, and has also sued him in federal court in that state. But her lawyer says she may go to California, where Bryant resides, to file a civil suit against the basketball star. “The 20-year-old woman would not be bound in California by the limitations on financial damages that might apply to court in Colorado, attorney Lin Wood said. ‘In the final analysis, we’ll make the decision whether to go to California or not based on whether it’s in the best interests of this young lady,’ Wood said. ‘We’re going to focus our efforts on maximizing the potential recovery from Kobe Bryant.'” The criminal case against Bryant was dismissed Sept. 1 and cannot be filed again. (Steve Lipsher, “Lawyer: Calif. suit eyed to escape damage caps, Denver Post, Nov. 7).

Touchy Colorado bar

Last month the Colorado Bar Association sent a letter to both major political parties in the state instructing them to have their candidates “focus on the issues, avoid name-calling, and not resort to stereotyping any groups of people as the scapegoats for society?s complex problems. This includes generalized attacks aimed at judges or lawyers.” According to a Denver Post editorial (“How many lawyers does it take…”, Sept. 20):

“It totally cracked us up,” said Chris Gates, chairman of the Colorado Democratic Party. “I’ve received a lot of letters advocating for this issue or that, but this was the first letter that said ‘could you please refrain from saying mean things.”‘

Ted Halaby, a prominent lawyer and chairman of the state Republican Party, said the letter “showed a certain ultra-sensitivity.”

Coors shareholder? Operators are standing by

“A New York-based class-action law firm is trolling the Internet for Coors shareholders concerned that they will be financially hurt by the company’s proposed marriage to Molson.” Manhattan attorneys Ronen Sarraf and Joseph Gentile posted a message on a Yahoo financial urging “upset Coors shareholders to send their grievance to an e-mail address. The message goes on to say: ‘An attorney will get in touch with you.'” The message boards “can be a good place to win business, [Sarraf] said. … ‘As for intensifying any dislike the public has against lawyers, there is very little one can do about that'”. (Tom McGhee, “Lawyers on Net seek investors worried by deal”, Denver Post, Jul. 27)(via Colorado Civil Justice League).

Welcome “All Things Considered” listeners

National Public Radio’s widely aired news show ran a piece yesterday afternoon (Saturday) on lawsuit reform as a factor in the election; the reporter first interviewed me at a couple of minutes’ length, and then turned the floor over to two professors who took the opposite view. The second of the two profs carried on at length about supposed public misunderstanding of the McDonald’s coffee (Stella Liebeck) case in a way that made me wish Ted had gotten some air time. I’m likewise quoted in a Denver Post article analyzing Congress’s failure to pass any litigation reform this term (Anne C. Mulkern, “Lawsuit caps lose support at roll call”, Sept. 13). Karen Selick kindly referenced me this summer in a piece for Canada’s National Post (“Stacking the deck against big tobacco”, Jun. 2, not online). And New York’s esteemed Observer, the one on the orange paper, carried in its last issue a favorable-in-context reference to “the [unnamed] Overlawyered.com guy”, meaning in this case me rather than Ted. (Tom Scocca, “Blogging Off Daily Can Make You Blind”, New York Observer, Sept. 20).

“Pay the lawyers in coupons, too”

The editorialists of Denver’s Rocky Mountain News (Jul. 25) are critical of the settlement of a class action suit against AT&T Wireless said to be worth a maximum of $20 million in coupons, airtime and other benefits. Under the deal, most former subscribers will be offered noncash benefits with a value not to exceed $3, while current subscribers will be offered noncash benefits with an estimated average value of $10.50. Denver law firm Hill & Robbins (see also Jun. 9) is asking for $3 million cash in fees, plus $750,000 in expenses. The suit challenged the cell-phone company’s practice of delayed roaming charge billing, under which some roaming fees were not charged to customers’ bills until the next month, resulting in a detriment to those customers who had used up all their allotted minutes in the later month. See also John Accola, “Lawyers’ bonanza in AT&T lawsuit”, Scripps Howard/Sun, Jul. 20 (via Colorado Civil Justice League).