National Public Radio’s widely aired news show ran a piece yesterday afternoon (Saturday) on lawsuit reform as a factor in the election; the reporter first interviewed me at a couple of minutes’ length, and then turned the floor over to two professors who took the opposite view. The second of the two profs carried on at length about supposed public misunderstanding of the McDonald’s coffee (Stella Liebeck) case in a way that made me wish Ted had gotten some air time. I’m likewise quoted in a Denver Post article analyzing Congress’s failure to pass any litigation reform this term (Anne C. Mulkern, “Lawsuit caps lose support at roll call”, Sept. 13). Karen Selick kindly referenced me this summer in a piece for Canada’s National Post (“Stacking the deck against big tobacco”, Jun. 2, not online). And New York’s esteemed Observer, the one on the orange paper, carried in its last issue a favorable-in-context reference to “the [unnamed] Overlawyered.com guy”, meaning in this case me rather than Ted. (Tom Scocca, “Blogging Off Daily Can Make You Blind”, New York Observer, Sept. 20).
Posts Tagged ‘tobacco’
Next: a Federal Tobacco Agency?
So what happens if the Bush Justice Department does manage to convince a federal judge (see Sept. 21, etc.) that the U.S. tobacco industry has constituted a “racketeering enterprise” for these many years and ought to pay the government $280 billion? Forbes traces some of the likely fiscal consequences: bankruptcy for even very large tobacco manufacturers; a de facto federal ownership stake in the industry through its role as chief creditor; and higher prices for smokers, who presumably count as an innocent party.
Oddly, the Forbes account has nothing to say about the consequences of a federal victory for the group that currently milks the most money out of the tobacco business, namely the state governments and plaintiff’s lawyers who yearly pocket vast sums from the 1998 multistate settlement (along with, in the former case, vast revenues from taxes distinct from the settlement). A good chunk of this expected future flow of settlement money has already been “securitized”, thus securing a short-term cash windfall for the states and lawyers, by selling it to bond investors; presumably the owners of these bonds are also at risk. Now, as asserted property interests go, the interest of these various parties in the future stream of ill-gotten income from the settlement heist has scant claim to be regarded as sacrosanct; still, it will hardly improve this nation’s reputation for security of property for this industry to be pillaged a second time through flimsy legal theories wielded by high authority. (Daniel Fisher, “Smoking dopes”, Forbes, Sept. 22).
Federal tobacco trial to begin
The Justice Department — this under the supposedly free-market, tort-reforming administration of George W. Bush — has delivered itself of the following remarkable pronouncement: “”the United States would be justified in seeking disgorgement of the proceeds from all [cigarette] sales to people of all ages from 1954 into the future.” As it is, it’s demanding a mere $280 billion in its baldly retroactive suit, this after Judge Gladys Kessler’s dismissal of the department’s Medicaid-recoupment claims. (Jacob Sullum, “Smoking in the Dark”, syndicated/Reason, Sept. 17; see Ron Scherer, “In the largest suit yet, US sues the tobacco industry”, Christian Science Monitor, Sept. 20). For more on the suit’s threat to First Amendment values, see Sept. 23, Oct. 13 and Oct. 25, 1999; for its status as an attempted end run around democracy, see Jan. 15-16, 2000; for other reactions at the time of its filing, see Sept. 29 and Oct. 26, 1999; plus our other posts, and most recently Jul. 16, 2004. More: Legal Times, Sept. 21.
“Deadbeat” dads: how many in jail?
The Department of Justice “states that 2,078,570 people were incarcerated ‘in Federal or State prisons or in local jails’ as of June 30, 2003.” How many of them were fathers behind on their child support payments? It seems impossible to get a firm answer to that question, or even a decent estimate. Some such fathers are genuinely able to pay but are expressing contumely toward the court; others, however, appear to have landed in a latter-day equivalent of debtor’s prison. “Their employment prospects sink with each imprisonment, even as their child support debt rises.” (Wendy McElroy, “In Defense of ‘Deadbeat’ Dads”, FoxNews, Aug. 4).
And, of course, parents wind up in jail for nonfinancial offenses too. A “Virginia mother was sentenced [Aug. 12] to 10 days in jail for defying a court order not to smoke in front of her children.” After spending four hours behind bars Tamara Silvius was released on bond for purposes of appealing the order. (Sue Anne Pressley, “Mother Who Smoked Near Family Gets Jail”, Washington Post, Aug. 13).
New at Point of Law
Over at our sister website Point of Law there are new posts galore, including Jim Copland on “light” tobacco suits and Ted Frank on second-guessing of the FDA by liability actions; links to MedPundit on asbestos, Robert Samuelson on the AGs’ global warming lawsuit, David Bernstein on the “Friends” harassment suit, and a not notably favorable review of the new documentary “The Corporation”; and employment law topics ranging from Wal-Mart litigation to Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing to the Griggs disparate-impact standard. And, of course, the centerpiece is the featured discussion now underway between Profs. Lester Brickman and Richard Painter on contingency fee reform.
With a little help from their friends
The Association of Trial Lawyers of America has decided to cultivate friends on both sides of the aisle. Long viewed as a friend of Democrats, the organization is beginning to see the wisdom of courting Republicans, too:
ATLA stepped up its courting of Republicans — particularly in the Senate — about three years ago. David Casey Jr., a Democrat who at the time was ATLA’s vice president, invited Mr. Parkinson, the Republican lawyer, to his San Diego law office….Mr. Parkinson went to see Sen. Hatch, who, he says, told him, “Not all Republican senators and House members favor the wholesale dismantling of the civil-justice system, but the view is that you’re completely Democratic.” If ATLA “would just try to be fair to both sides, they’re going to find the reception” among Republicans more welcoming, Sen. Hatch says in an interview.
How “fair” do they have to be to get a warm welcome? Let’s look at the numbers for the politicians mentioned in the article: Orrin G. Hatch, Saxby Chambliss, Lindsey Graham, and John T. Doolittle. Evidently, their work is paying off:
The trial bar’s Republican push again showed results last month, when Sen. Kyl tried once more to pass his attorney-fee cap for tobacco cases. This time, 15 Republicans opposed it, two more than last time.
Money talks. And trial lawyers have no shortage of money.
Second Hand Smoke
An Overlawyered reader makes a point worth debating about second hand smoke and the law:
In the case of smoking, I am one of those who thinks someone smoking around me (in public, of course – they can do as they like as long as the smoke stays on their own property) is a form of assault.
Analogy – chlorine gas. A little more obvious, a little quicker, and therefore easier to condemn, but whatever crime someone who releases chlorine gas in a public place (or directly onto my property) is committing, a person who blows their smoke on me in a similar manner is committing.
You want to dip? Chew? Snuff? Take tobacco intravenously? Knock yourself out – but leave me out of it! And if the legislature won’t protect my rights, then the lawyers are all I have left… Ouch, that’s a terrible choice.
It certainly is a terrible choice. But, is the case for second hand smoke really analogous to chlorine gas? Chlorine gas is highly caustic and causes immediate damage to the lungs. Lung damage can occur with doses as low as 9 parts per million.
Second hand tobacco smoke, on the other hand, is a little more complex. It’s composed of many different components, for one thing, kind of like smoke from a fire. One of its deadliest components is, perhaps, carbon monoxide, which can kill at concentrations of 2000 ppm and cause symptoms at doses of 200ppm. The amount of carbon monoxide in second hand smoke will vary depending on the concentration of the smoke, but even in a submerged submarine filled with smokers, the amount of carbon monoxide produced in three days is only 6.6 ppm, well within OSHA’s work-safety standards.
A better analogy of second hand smoke would be perfume. As crazy as this may sound, I have never had to admit someone for an exacerbation of their asthma or emphysema because their neighbor or a relative was smoking outside on their porch. But, I have had to admit patients whose asthma or emphysema was aggravated by perfume or incense. So where do we draw the line? If the smoker commits assault with his second hand smoke, then so, too, do the heavily perfumed with their Chanel No. 5.
They Mind Very Much If You Smoke
Retired history professor, and former smoker, Robert Zangrando is suing his next door neighbor for smoking. The neighbor, who isn’t allowed to smoke inside her rented condominium, smokes outside on her patio, where the fumes evidently waft into the professor’s condo. The lawsuit, filed in January, was slated to begin this month, but has been delayed until September. In those intervening months, his neighbor has agreed to smoke in her backyard during only the first fifteen minutes of every hour. She’s also decided to move her family to a new neighborhood. Conflict resolved, right? Wrong. Zangrando is still pursuing his case. He’s charging her with battery and trespass and wants $50,000 in damages. The former smoker blames his neighbor’s smoking, not his own, for his declining lung capacity.
The report in the The Cleveland Plain Dealer notes that there has been an increase in these second-hand smoke lawsuits:
Secondhand smoke often leads to conflicts, and more than 420 lawsuits involving secondhand smoke have been filed in the last 25 years, according to research by Edward Sweda Jr., senior attorney for the Tobacco Control Resource Center at the Northeastern University School of Law in Boston.
“There have been an increasing number of lawsuits in recent years that corresponds to people’s increased awareness of secondhand smoke and the physical harm it can cause,” he said, “and the gradually increasing societal disfavor of tolerating such exposure.”
Well, it’s not just due to an increased awareness, it’s also due to the work of legal activist groups like this one.
In the Kerry skyboxes
Unlike his running mate John Edwards, John Kerry has willingly disclosed the identities of his “bundlers”, the financiers responsible for raising large amounts of money in grouped donations. (He has 266 who’ve come in at the $100,000+ level, compared with more than 525 for George W. Bush.) Names familiar to readers of this site are well represented: “Trial lawyers who represent injured people in suits against business are prominent Kerry fans. Among his $100,000 Vice Chairmen are Florida plaintiff’s lawyer Kirk Wager, who hosted Mr. Kerry’s first presidential fund-raiser at his Coconut Grove home in December 2002, and attorneys Richard Scruggs of Mississippi and John Coale of Washington, both part of the tobacco companies’ $206 billion settlement with 46 states.” However, Mr. Kerry (like Mr. Bush, but unlike Mr. Edwards) also raises large amounts from other types of law firms, including firms known for lobbying and for general business work, including Mintz Levin and Piper Rudnick. (Wayne Slater, “Vested interests in Kerry”, Dallas Morning News, Jul. 25).
“Lawyers, especially trial lawyers, are the engine of the Kerry fundraising operation,” reports the Washington Post. “Lawyers and law firms have given more money to Kerry, $12 million, than any other sector. One out of four of Kerry’s big-dollar fundraisers is a lawyer, and one out of 10 is an attorney for plaintiffs in personal injury, medical malpractice or other lawsuits seeking damages. …
“Among the trial lawyers who raised money for Kerry early in the campaign were Michael V. Ciresi of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP, who represented Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota in its successful $6.5 billion suit against the tobacco industry, and Michael T. Thorsnes, who recently retired from his San Diego law firm after winning $250 million in settlements and verdicts.” After Kerry locked up the race, “One trend was a sharp increase in the number of trial lawyers joining the Kerry fundraising campaign. Among those soon joining as major fundraisers were John P. Coale, one of the nation’s most prominent trial lawyers, whose better-known cases include the Union Carbide disaster in Bhopal, India, and at least 16 plane crashes; Robert L. Lieff, founding partner of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, a San Francisco-based firm that lists four class-action settlements in 2004 alone totaling $176.5 million; and San Francisco lawyer Arnold Laub, whose firm Web site lists its participation in the $3.7 billion fen-phen settlement, a $185 million toxic chemical award and $4.5 million for a pedestrian accident case. … John Morgan, an Orlando lawyer whose firm specializes in medical malpractice, said he has helped raise more than $500,000 for Kerry.” (Thomas B. Edsall, James V. Grimaldi and Alice R. Crites, “Redefining Democratic Fundraising”, Washington Post, Jul. 24)(our politics archive).
Alien Tort Claims Act
…discussed by Jim Copland at Point Of Law, here and here. Also discussion of tobacco litigation (here and here), asbestos bankruptcies and Wal-Mart. And of course my discussion with Michael Krauss of whether gun-suit pre-emption by Congress is compatible with the Constitution continues on the featured discussion page, with one more day left to go before we wrap things up.