Ninth Circuit Follies: Jones v. Los Angeles

by Ted Frank on April 24, 2006

Also commenting on the Ninth Circuit’s latest foray into questionable social policy-making: Howard Bashman and Jack Dunphy.

{ 4 comments }

1 David Wilson 04.24.06 at 5:41 pm

If a state cannot legitimately and Constitutionally keep vagrants out from underfoot, it’s hard to imagine what power they do have. A simpler, more necessary exercise of the police power, I can’t imagine.

2 Heywood 04.25.06 at 2:01 pm

The dissent there’s been deleted, according to the webserver. Can it be found elsewhere?

3 Ted 04.25.06 at 4:28 pm

Try this link at page 36.

4 TC 04.27.06 at 5:53 am

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1145621819299

This one helps a bit.

I can’t even imagine the gene pool the 9th circut came from. Really I can’t. Well two of them, hoping on something like a quake to shake some sense into the other two. They seem to have a cronic inability to UNDERSTAND the difference between creating law, and interpreting law!

This too shall be overturned, just another waste of money and time will be expended in the process, but when one must deal with the 9th, oh well, one must also budget for additional steps I suppose.

Comments on this entry are closed.