In the wacky warning genre, that one’s been around a while, but it can still get a discussion going (Wegman’s, What If via Megan McArdle).
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on August 27, 2008
In the wacky warning genre, that one’s been around a while, but it can still get a discussion going (Wegman’s, What If via Megan McArdle).
Tagged as: wacky warnings

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 2 comments }
Wacky perhaps, but not surprising. Arguably, this labeling is required by the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004, Title II of Public Law 108-282. See:
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/alrgact.html
Certainly it is easier to add a stupid warning than to contest the law, and risk having FDA force you to recall your peanut butter.
Fans of wacky warning labels might get a smile out of these just in time warnings for laptops:
http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1143b.html
Comments on this entry are closed.